Topic Sponsor
Stereo/Audio Come discuss all Ford F150 Stereo and Audio questions here!
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: The Magic Brand

Anyone used FORScan for flat signal to DSP?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-26-2017, 12:13 PM
  #31  
Member
 
GABAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Georgia
Posts: 616
Received 55 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

Where`s the Parametric?
Old 02-26-2017, 12:38 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
Grumble's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Carrollton, TX
Posts: 139
Received 16 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GABAR
Where`s the Parametric?
there are 30 bands of parametric for each output. There are 8 inputs and 10 outputs. You can adjust each output individually- or group them (for front stage, rear fill) and adjust accordingly. Same with the 24db/octave crossovers - so it makes it easy to run all components active.

They're supposed to be shipping a "smaller" version soon (DM-608) which has 6 inputs and 8 outputs with all of the same features.

It's a very cool unit.

After further reading my manual - there are:

The DM-608/DM-810 features a graphic EQ with a few twists: 1. Modes a. 30 band mode: 30 bands of 1/3rd octave EQ b. 10 band mode: 10 bands of 1 octave EQ c. 14 band mode: a mix of 1/3rd octave EQ in the bass region and 1 octave EQ in the midrange and treble regions.

Last edited by Grumble; 02-26-2017 at 12:42 PM.
Old 02-26-2017, 12:52 PM
  #33  
Member
 
GABAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Georgia
Posts: 616
Received 55 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Grumble
there are 30 bands of parametric for each output. There are 8 inputs and 10 outputs. You can adjust each output individually- or group them (for front stage, rear fill) and adjust accordingly. Same with the 24db/octave crossovers - so it makes it easy to run all components active.

They're supposed to be shipping a "smaller" version soon (DM-608) which has 6 inputs and 8 outputs with all of the same features.

It's a very cool unit.

After further reading my manual - there are:

The DM-608/DM-810 features a graphic EQ with a few twists: 1. Modes a. 30 band mode: 30 bands of 1/3rd octave EQ b. 10 band mode: 10 bands of 1 octave EQ c. 14 band mode: a mix of 1/3rd octave EQ in the bass region and 1 octave EQ in the midrange and treble regions.
Oh ok and thanks for the info.

Audio Control really needs to improve the owners manual for this unit on their website because they do a really poor job of explaining all of the features of this DSP.

I`m going with the JL TwK and the new PAC piece.
Old 03-03-2017, 11:09 AM
  #34  
Senior Member
 
James Cole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 304
Received 34 Likes on 25 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by _MacLeod_
There was a discussion on the DIY Mobile Audio forum where this came up but I'm not sure how much success there was with it. One guy had his ACM reprogrammed but it still had a pretty wicked volume dependent EQ going on. Everything from 100 Hz and up is cut significantly at low volumes to make the bass louder and they flatten out together as the volume is raised but then everything from 15K and up is dropped significantly at higher volumes. It shouldn't be a huge deal and some may even like it but if you're audio snob like me, it will matter.

So we're not exactly sure what is actually accomplished by messing around in FORSCAN but most of the thread was discussing different interface units like the new one from PAC and processors like the JL Audio Fix.
The EQ curve the ACM puts out its not noticeable... I think it helps when you listen at low levels you need a bit more output from the sub and at very high levels you want to tame the highs a bit...
Old 03-03-2017, 11:19 AM
  #35  
Senior Member
 
James Cole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 304
Received 34 Likes on 25 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by UNBROKEN
My last build was a Clarion DRZ9255 into a 6to8v8 with RCD, a pair of Mosconi AS 200.4's, Focal Utopia Be 3 ways and an Illusion Carbon C12XL.
This time will be OEM head into a 6to8v8 with RCD, 3 Mosconi One amps for the size, Illusion Carbon C6, C6CX and C12.
I want to 100% hide everything this time.
I wanted to to do something similar to yours but had some old equipment from my old install that I prefer to save some money and use it...

My first choice was Carbon C8 + C3X front stage, Lucent L6C for rear and C10XL.

Went with Hertz Mille Legend front, Lucent L6C rear and C10XL.

For amps I purchased the Mosconi AS100.4 for active front stage and center, rear and subs is being ran by JL Audio HD900/5

I also have an old audison Bit One but it makes some strange noises some times, next week a Mosconi 8to12 should be installed to take care of that.

Originally we started with the OEM Sony sound system, we reprogrammed for low level output and de-equalization (thanks to LIVNITUP & DanMC85). We did a quick little test with a speaker and were getting all sync 3 voice commands from the low level outputs without any other mods to the wiring, we chose to get the low level outputs from behind of the truck where they went to the OEM Sony amp.

As you can see OEM Amp and sub are completely off the vehicle and not needed anymore, if this could not be done there´s no way in hell I would venture to add a system feeding of the Sony amp it would be terrible.

Name:  IMG_2226_2.jpg
Views: 7117
Size:  104.1 KB

Name:  IMG_2249_2.jpg
Views: 7188
Size:  82.4 KB

Name:  IMG_2250_2.jpg
Views: 7221
Size:  92.3 KB

Name:  IMG_2266_2.jpg
Views: 7322
Size:  109.0 KB

Name:  IMG_2267_2.jpg
Views: 7276
Size:  128.5 KB

Name:  IMG_2305_2.jpg
Views: 7208
Size:  74.3 KB

Name:  IMG_2317_2.jpg
Views: 7162
Size:  52.7 KB

Name:  IMG_2335_2.jpg
Views: 7343
Size:  146.5 KB

Name:  IMG_2336_2.jpg
Views: 7489
Size:  143.3 KB

The SQ is excellent, all chimes work well (maybe a little lower in volume especially PDC) Noise floor is not audible with vehicle running and it will be lower with the 8to12...

I think the ACM reprogram is the best solution by far because you keep it simple and with less devices on the chain which is always good.

Very happy with the result, normally when taking the OEM signal to a new system is very complicated and the SQ is well... not up there like an aftermarket deck. With this mod I can surely say this is like adding an aftermarket deck without any of the downsides.

There are more OEM EQ options under forscan... maybe we just haven't found the option that is truly flat at all volumes but with the current option selected thanks to Livntup & DanMC85 to me is perfect and not noticeable at all!

Last edited by James Cole; 03-03-2017 at 11:22 AM.
Old 03-03-2017, 09:48 PM
  #36  
Mass Effect
 
_MacLeod_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 313
Received 84 Likes on 66 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by James Cole
The EQ curve the ACM puts out its not noticeable... I think it helps when you listen at low levels you need a bit more output from the sub and at very high levels you want to tame the highs a bit...
That's what I'm thinking as well. A guy on DIYMA was able to post up some measurements from his Ford Escape ACM and I came to mostly the same conclusion. The high end roll off starts at 15K which most people won't be able to hear anyway. The low end though runs up to 100 Hz which could be kinda problematic. It actually doesn't roll off the bass. It attenuates everything from 100 Hz and up by like 30 db at the lowest volume and then as you raise the volume, everything else comes up while 20-100 Hz stays the same so when you're at near max volume, the mids and highs have caught up with the 20-100 Hz range.

80-100 Hz is getting into the boomy part of the sub bass and can be an area that you don't want accented. Every car I've ever tuned, 80 Hz is where I start cutting. I plan on getting back into MECA SQ competitions with this system so that would be a problem for me. All those stand up bass tracks on the judging disc, that 80-100 Hz range would boom like crazy. But that's what the JL Audio Fix should hopefully cure. I figure mounting the remote volume control just behind the gear shifter would be the best place. My arm is resting on the center console 90% of the time and my fingers are dangling right there anyway so it would be just as convenient, actually a little more so than using the steering wheel controls. The only thing I really use them for anyways is the Mute function which would still work.
Old 03-03-2017, 09:56 PM
  #37  
Senior Member
 
James Cole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 304
Received 34 Likes on 25 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by _MacLeod_
That's what I'm thinking as well. A guy on DIYMA was able to post up some measurements from his Ford Escape ACM and I came to mostly the same conclusion. The high end roll off starts at 15K which most people won't be able to hear anyway. The low end though runs up to 100 Hz which could be kinda problematic. It actually doesn't roll off the bass. It attenuates everything from 100 Hz and up by like 30 db at the lowest volume and then as you raise the volume, everything else comes up while 20-100 Hz stays the same so when you're at near max volume, the mids and highs have caught up with the 20-100 Hz range.

80-100 Hz is getting into the boomy part of the sub bass and can be an area that you don't want accented. Every car I've ever tuned, 80 Hz is where I start cutting. I plan on getting back into MECA SQ competitions with this system so that would be a problem for me. All those stand up bass tracks on the judging disc, that 80-100 Hz range would boom like crazy. But that's what the JL Audio Fix should hopefully cure. I figure mounting the remote volume control just behind the gear shifter would be the best place. My arm is resting on the center console 90% of the time and my fingers are dangling right there anyway so it would be just as convenient, actually a little more so than using the steering wheel controls. The only thing I really use them for anyways is the Mute function which would still work.
You should definitely try and see, I remember reading a post from someone who did this mod and competed as well for SQ, he used the DRC volume just to be safe when being judged but he said he couldn't really tell a difference from cranking the OEM volume or the DRC volume.

As for the "boomines" its simply not there, maybe the ACM has changed (DIYMA guy did not have Sony) and there is also other Forscan EQs setting I have not experimented with because I see no need. I get clean and tight bass at all volumes and I do tune my systems to around 80hz as well.
Old 03-03-2017, 10:02 PM
  #38  
Mass Effect
 
_MacLeod_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 313
Received 84 Likes on 66 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by James Cole
You should definitely try and see, I remember reading a post from someone who did this mod and competed as well for SQ, he used the DRC volume just to be safe when being judged but he said he couldn't really tell a difference from cranking the OEM volume or the DRC volume.

As for the "boomines" its simply not there, maybe the ACM has changed (DIYMA guy did not have Sony) and there is also other Forscan EQs setting I have not experimented with because I see no need. I get clean and tight bass at all volumes and I do tune my systems to around 80hz as well.
That's good to know. Maybe once I get everything installed, I'll hold off on permanently installing the DRC and just use the factory remote instead and see how that works. If the Fix isn't having to de-EQ anything, it'll still be valuable for boosting the input signal and sending it out optically to the processor. I don't have first hand knowledge yet but word is, the noise floor is exceptionally low with the Fix. That's the main thing I'm trying to get around, the hiss associated with running speaker level inputs. Way too many quiet tracks on the judging disc for a steady hissssssssssss to be acceptable.
Old 03-03-2017, 10:23 PM
  #39  
Senior Member
 
James Cole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 304
Received 34 Likes on 25 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by _MacLeod_
That's good to know. Maybe once I get everything installed, I'll hold off on permanently installing the DRC and just use the factory remote instead and see how that works. If the Fix isn't having to de-EQ anything, it'll still be valuable for boosting the input signal and sending it out optically to the processor. I don't have first hand knowledge yet but word is, the noise floor is exceptionally low with the Fix. That's the main thing I'm trying to get around, the hiss associated with running speaker level inputs. Way too many quiet tracks on the judging disc for a steady hissssssssssss to be acceptable.
My hiss right now is barely and I mean BARELY audible with the truck off inside my garage, truck on is not possible to hear it.

With the 8to12 8v I think I will make it at least 50% less which is truly low, the main reason for using the 8to12 is not the hiss is some other stuff, but right now the hiss to me is not noticeable even when cranking the volume and passing "quiet" parts in a track.
Old 03-03-2017, 10:47 PM
  #40  
Mass Effect
 
_MacLeod_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 313
Received 84 Likes on 66 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by James Cole
My hiss right now is barely and I mean BARELY audible with the truck off inside my garage, truck on is not possible to hear it.

With the 8to12 8v I think I will make it at least 50% less which is truly low, the main reason for using the 8to12 is not the hiss is some other stuff, but right now the hiss to me is not noticeable even when cranking the volume and passing "quiet" parts in a track.
OK, I know this Forscan thing has been out there a while but for some reason you've just now piqued my interest in it. I'm trying to find stuff to read about it just now so let me see if I've got this figured out. Buying one of
these ScanTool OBDLink MX these ScanTool OBDLink MX
tools, I can use Forscan to turn off the EQ from the ACM? I get the part about turning the stock speaker outputs to low level outputs but we're still back to the hiss issue. What I'm wondering is, according to that thread, you can keep the stock speaker wires as high level and just turn off the EQ, then I could run that to the Fix to boost the signal and send it optically to my Twk processor....right?

If so, I think that might be the best option for me since I already spent the $300 on the Fix. That should theoretically give me a noise free signal to my processor and let me use all the stock volume controls without any variable EQ. If I didn't have the Fix, I think you're right that this is the best option for somebody to go as it only costs the $80 investment on the OBDLink tool which can be used for SO much more down the road. Seems like a no-brainer if it's that easy.

One question, this line from the Fusion forum:
... this wasn't/isn't a free mod, which is why it isn't in FORScan. That being said, it can be enabled with FORScan versus having to send out your ACM or finding a Ford dealership with IDS. It will not be shared/made public. This code change for your ACM would need to be purchased like any other vehicle mod.
WTF?? OK, I thought all you need was an OBDLink tool and Forscan. Now this post is saying you have to buy some code to enable this option? That makes no sense.

Last edited by _MacLeod_; 03-03-2017 at 11:12 PM.


Quick Reply: Anyone used FORScan for flat signal to DSP?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:45 PM.