Topic Sponsor
General F150 Discussion General Ford F150 truck discussions and questions
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Finally! The answer to 5.0 vs EB debate

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-16-2017, 11:59 PM
  #101  
Boosting Traveler
 
Eco_BooSted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: SoCal
Posts: 71
Received 20 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by acdii
While those other crappy excuses for a truck "might" get slightly better(better than the 20 I get now?) MPG, my 3.5EB will still out tow them all. I'll challenge any of those brands with a liked geared truck/payload and like sized/weight trailer up any grade because I know it will out pull them.

Thats what puts the Ecoboost ahead of the pack, not that it's a turbo V6, but has the torque of a diesel in a gas engine.
2017 Lariat 3.5EB 10 spd Max tow pkg here. YUUUUUUP...went to CA Redwoods this last month (14 hrs north then 14 hrs south) and bombed ALL the NorCal hills over my buddy's 2500 diesel. It left my buddy speechless (in a good way) ..I had my 32' TT (8k wet) and left him in the dust several times over, without all the running starts. Funny thing is that we weren't even racing I just drove ... period. Id chose EBTT over v8 any day. Not sorry.
Eco_BooSted is offline  
Old 07-17-2017, 01:24 AM
  #102  
Senior Member

 
robertsunrus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 430
Received 124 Likes on 88 Posts

Default These are what most of you said.

Hi, final analysis:


Ecoboost wins for towing especially at altitude.


5.0 Coyote sounds better.


Both get similar gas mileage.


Both engines were beat to death by Ford and survived.
robertsunrus is offline  
Old 07-17-2017, 08:44 AM
  #103  
SSDD
 
SCORGE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 17,605
Received 1,612 Likes on 1,125 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by robertsunrus
Hi, final analysis:


Ecoboost wins for towing especially at altitude.


5.0 Coyote sounds better.


Both get similar gas mileage.


Both engines were beat to death by Ford and survived.
overall selling point for me
SCORGE is online now  
Old 07-17-2017, 09:47 AM
  #104  
Senior Member
 
acdii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 13,828
Received 2,719 Likes on 2,056 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by robertsunrus
Hi, final analysis:


Ecoboost wins for towing especially at altitude.


5.0 Coyote sounds better.


Both get similar gas mileage.


Both engines were beat to death by Ford and survived.

We have a WINNER!!
acdii is offline  
Old 07-17-2017, 09:50 AM
  #105  
Senior Member
 
lutter5-0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: SoDak/Iowa
Posts: 1,265
Received 216 Likes on 170 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by robertsunrus
Hi, final analysis:


Ecoboost wins for towing especially at altitude.


5.0 Coyote sounds better.


Both get similar gas mileage.


Both engines were beat to death by Ford and survived.
Long term reliability?
lutter5-0 is offline  
Old 07-17-2017, 10:13 AM
  #106  
Senior Member
 
MagneticScrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Received 97 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

The funny part to me about this stupid discussion is all the claims the EB can outpull this or that and %99 EB equiped F150s dont have the payload to support its max trailer rating.
MagneticScrew is offline  
Old 07-17-2017, 10:40 AM
  #107  
Senior Member
 
RACarvalho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 341
Received 52 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

I'm coming from the BMW world and I can guarantee you that more complexity brings more reliability problems.
To me that's a fact.
Maybe, If Ford have done a really good job, the reliability between the 5.0 and 3.5EB will be the same within the warranty period but after that it's really hard to believe the EB will not have more problems.
The additional lines for lubrication, cooling, vaccum, etc and the additional wastegate valves, actuators and vaccum pump on the EB don't have the same life span than the additional pistons, valves, etc of the 5.0. Rubber and plastic will not last the same as aluminum and steel....
RACarvalho is offline  
Old 07-17-2017, 10:44 AM
  #108  
Senior Member
 
jschmidt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 127
Received 29 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Back in the day, people just like us argued about whether or not to abandon the flat head and the straight six, and whether or not to avoid automatic transmissions and power windows.
jschmidt is offline  
Old 07-17-2017, 11:02 AM
  #109  
Senior Member
 
MagneticScrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Received 97 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

RACaval gets it. 👍🏽
MagneticScrew is offline  
Old 07-17-2017, 11:25 AM
  #110  
Senior Member

 
jwanck11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,204
Received 325 Likes on 223 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MagneticScrew
The funny part to me about this stupid discussion is all the claims the EB can outpull this or that and %99 EB equiped F150s dont have the payload to support its max trailer rating.
This is NOT about max trailer weight. This is about towing in general.

I have pulled 7K lbs with BOTH engines. Clearly this is not max towing rating. The EB and the 5.0 are significantly different in capabilities. All you have to do is look at the torque curves or have actual experience in towing the same load with each engine (which 99% of you do not have.)

Sound is a preference. Capability is not.
jwanck11 is offline  
The following users liked this post:
chimmike (07-17-2017)



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:32 PM.