Topic Sponsor
General F150 Discussion General Ford F150 truck discussions and questions
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Finally! The answer to 5.0 vs EB debate

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-29-2017, 07:21 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
redranger04g's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,357
Received 325 Likes on 240 Posts

Default Finally! The answer to 5.0 vs EB debate

Well there you have it...
redranger04g is offline  
The following users liked this post:
wizwor (07-02-2017)
Old 06-29-2017, 07:41 PM
  #2  
Member

 
RLXXI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Big Easy
Posts: 26,680
Received 6,199 Likes on 4,672 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by redranger04g
(9) Take a close look at my signature.
.
RLXXI is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by RLXXI:
Wanted33 (06-30-2017), wizwor (07-02-2017)
Old 06-29-2017, 08:00 PM
  #3  
Senior Member

 
gone postal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Central NY
Posts: 25,669
Received 434 Likes on 289 Posts

Default

Repost
gone postal is offline  
The following users liked this post:
chimmike (07-14-2017)
Old 06-29-2017, 08:48 PM
  #4  
Member

 
RLXXI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Big Easy
Posts: 26,680
Received 6,199 Likes on 4,672 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by gone postal
Repost
1st time I've seen it.
.
RLXXI is offline  
Old 06-29-2017, 08:53 PM
  #5  
Senior Member

 
kenv47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Levittown, Pa
Posts: 2,690
Received 988 Likes on 667 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by gone postal
Repost
Yup!

https://www.f150forum.com/f118/engin...-techs-386568/
kenv47 is offline  
Old 06-30-2017, 10:59 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
WXman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 1,504
Received 310 Likes on 238 Posts
Default

This is old news, as it's been going around the forums all week.

However, it's so good that it's worth repeating.

ALL of Ford's competition is getting the same or better highway MPGs with V8 engines, so what Ford clearly should have done is they should have focused their R&D money on the 5.0/6.2 engines.

Focusing on their V8 engine program would have saved face, as well as cutting down on recalls and warranty repairs that are costly for the company, and it would have made them more competitive overall.

Instead, they try to think outside the box and do something other competitors haven't done and the end result is a group of problematic and expensive V6TT engines that do NOT have any real world fuel benefit whatsoever.

As a result, the sales gap is closing. Ram is outselling Chevy, and Chevy+GMC as a whole is gapping Ford.

There's an old saying... how's that go... oh yeah, "If it's ain't broke, don't fix it."
Attached Thumbnails Finally! The answer to 5.0 vs EB debate-truckmpgcomparison.jpg  
WXman is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Steelhead 6.2 (07-01-2017)
Old 06-30-2017, 11:19 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Kingofwylietx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 2,159
Received 716 Likes on 425 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by WXman

As a result, the sales gap is closing. Ram is outselling Chevy, and Chevy+GMC as a whole is gapping Ford.
I read an article last month that said the reason Ram is selling so many trucks is because of their deep discounting. They are the only ones who have not recently updated their vehicle, so they are competing on price.
Kingofwylietx is offline  
Old 06-30-2017, 12:34 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Speedfreak400's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Florida
Posts: 985
Received 220 Likes on 150 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by WXman
This is old news, as it's been going around the forums all week.

However, it's so good that it's worth repeating.

ALL of Ford's competition is getting the same or better highway MPGs with V8 engines, so what Ford clearly should have done is they should have focused their R&D money on the 5.0/6.2 engines.

Focusing on their V8 engine program would have saved face, as well as cutting down on recalls and warranty repairs that are costly for the company, and it would have made them more competitive overall.

Instead, they try to think outside the box and do something other competitors haven't done and the end result is a group of problematic and expensive V6TT engines that do NOT have any real world fuel benefit whatsoever.

As a result, the sales gap is closing. Ram is outselling Chevy, and Chevy+GMC as a whole is gapping Ford.

There's an old saying... how's that go... oh yeah, "If it's ain't broke, don't fix it."


While I am happy with my 3.5TT if there was a choice I would have gotten the 6.2.
Speedfreak400 is offline  
Old 06-30-2017, 08:15 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
acdii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 13,828
Received 2,719 Likes on 2,056 Posts

Default

While those other crappy excuses for a truck "might" get slightly better(better than the 20 I get now?) MPG, my 3.5EB will still out tow them all. I'll challenge any of those brands with a liked geared truck/payload and like sized/weight trailer up any grade because I know it will out pull them.

Thats what puts the Ecoboost ahead of the pack, not that it's a turbo V6, but has the torque of a diesel in a gas engine.
acdii is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Eco_BooSted (07-16-2017)
Old 07-02-2017, 12:11 AM
  #10  
Member
 
Mutau95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Carolinas
Posts: 45
Received 19 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Amen brother
Mutau95 is offline  



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:09 AM.