Finally! The answer to 5.0 vs EB debate - Ford F150 Forum - Community of Ford Truck Fans

Topic Sponsor
General F150 Discussion General Ford F150 truck discussions and questions
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Finally! The answer to 5.0 vs EB debate

Closed Thread

 
 
 
Old 06-29-2017, 07:21 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 879
Thanked 162 Times in 125 Posts
Default Finally! The answer to 5.0 vs EB debate

redranger04g is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to redranger04g For This Useful Post:
wizwor (07-02-2017)
Old 06-29-2017, 07:41 PM
  #2  
Fleet Technician
 
Rnlcomp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Big Easy
Posts: 18,704
Thanked 3,534 Times in 2,789 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by redranger04g View Post
(9) Take a close look at my signature.
.
Rnlcomp is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Rnlcomp For This Useful Post:
Wanted33 (06-30-2017), wizwor (07-02-2017)
Old 06-29-2017, 08:00 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
gone postal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Central NY
Posts: 5,696
Thanked 255 Times in 189 Posts
Default

Repost
gone postal is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to gone postal For This Useful Post:
chimmike (07-14-2017)
Old 06-29-2017, 08:48 PM
  #4  
Fleet Technician
 
Rnlcomp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Big Easy
Posts: 18,704
Thanked 3,534 Times in 2,789 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gone postal View Post
Repost
1st time I've seen it.
.
Rnlcomp is offline  
Old 06-29-2017, 08:53 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Levittown, Pa
Posts: 540
Thanked 82 Times in 69 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gone postal View Post
Repost
Yup!

https://www.f150forum.com/f118/engin...-techs-386568/
kenv47 is offline  
Old 06-30-2017, 10:59 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
WXman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 1,505
Thanked 277 Times in 215 Posts
Default

This is old news, as it's been going around the forums all week.

However, it's so good that it's worth repeating.

ALL of Ford's competition is getting the same or better highway MPGs with V8 engines, so what Ford clearly should have done is they should have focused their R&D money on the 5.0/6.2 engines.

Focusing on their V8 engine program would have saved face, as well as cutting down on recalls and warranty repairs that are costly for the company, and it would have made them more competitive overall.

Instead, they try to think outside the box and do something other competitors haven't done and the end result is a group of problematic and expensive V6TT engines that do NOT have any real world fuel benefit whatsoever.

As a result, the sales gap is closing. Ram is outselling Chevy, and Chevy+GMC as a whole is gapping Ford.

There's an old saying... how's that go... oh yeah, "If it's ain't broke, don't fix it."
Attached Thumbnails Finally! The answer to 5.0 vs EB debate-truckmpgcomparison.jpg  
WXman is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to WXman For This Useful Post:
Steelhead 6.2 (07-01-2017)
Old 06-30-2017, 11:19 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 1,001
Thanked 206 Times in 166 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by WXman View Post

As a result, the sales gap is closing. Ram is outselling Chevy, and Chevy+GMC as a whole is gapping Ford.
I read an article last month that said the reason Ram is selling so many trucks is because of their deep discounting. They are the only ones who have not recently updated their vehicle, so they are competing on price.
Kingofwylietx is offline  
Old 06-30-2017, 12:34 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Florida
Posts: 419
Thanked 51 Times in 38 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by WXman View Post
This is old news, as it's been going around the forums all week.

However, it's so good that it's worth repeating.

ALL of Ford's competition is getting the same or better highway MPGs with V8 engines, so what Ford clearly should have done is they should have focused their R&D money on the 5.0/6.2 engines.

Focusing on their V8 engine program would have saved face, as well as cutting down on recalls and warranty repairs that are costly for the company, and it would have made them more competitive overall.

Instead, they try to think outside the box and do something other competitors haven't done and the end result is a group of problematic and expensive V6TT engines that do NOT have any real world fuel benefit whatsoever.

As a result, the sales gap is closing. Ram is outselling Chevy, and Chevy+GMC as a whole is gapping Ford.

There's an old saying... how's that go... oh yeah, "If it's ain't broke, don't fix it."


While I am happy with my 3.5TT if there was a choice I would have gotten the 6.2.
Speedfreak400 is offline  
Old 06-30-2017, 08:15 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 5,736
Thanked 828 Times in 689 Posts
Default

While those other crappy excuses for a truck "might" get slightly better(better than the 20 I get now?) MPG, my 3.5EB will still out tow them all. I'll challenge any of those brands with a liked geared truck/payload and like sized/weight trailer up any grade because I know it will out pull them.

Thats what puts the Ecoboost ahead of the pack, not that it's a turbo V6, but has the torque of a diesel in a gas engine.
acdii is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to acdii For This Useful Post:
Eco_BooSted (07-16-2017)
Old 07-02-2017, 12:11 AM
  #10  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Carolinas
Posts: 22
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Amen brother
Mutau95 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
 
  • Ask a Question
    Get answers from community experts
Question Title:
Description:
Your question will be posted in: