Topic Sponsor
General F150 Discussion General Ford F150 truck discussions and questions
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2013 Ecoboost mpg

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-19-2018, 02:13 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Joe F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 370
Received 93 Likes on 74 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bassJAM
Yes, and yes.

I spent a lot of time searching all the threads out there specifically on the fuel mileage hit when I was contemplating a leveling kit and oversize tires. Seems a 1-2 mpg hit from a lift is common, and a 1-2 mpg hit from larger tires is common. I drive 20k miles a year, so a 2-4 mpg loss was enough to stop me from changing my trucks stance.

The lift hurts your aerodynamics and forces your truck to work harder to push air out of the way. You're letting more air under the truck which creates more drag on all the nooks and crannies down there. There's a reason modern trucks have those huge air damns that lower your ground clearance.

The larger tires hurt in three ways ways; 1) they are heavier and make your engine work harder to turn them. 2) they have a larger diameter and make your engine work harder to turn them. 3) they often have all terrain or mud terrain tread patterns with higher rolling resistance, which yep, makes your engine work harder to turn them.
Interesting. It may vary by the amount of change. With a 2" leveling kit up front, I'm saw maybe 0.5mpg less when I do the 40mi commute to my main office via interstate (70-75mph) and no real difference at all putzing around town. I am good with that 0.5mpg since the level just looks soooooooooo good. Ha ha!
Old 06-19-2018, 02:58 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
schmenke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 570
Received 111 Likes on 81 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bassJAM
...
The larger tires hurt in three ways ways; 1) they are heavier and make your engine work harder to turn them. 2) they have a larger diameter and make your engine work harder to turn them. 3) they often have all terrain or mud terrain tread patterns with higher rolling resistance, which yep, makes your engine work harder to turn them.
Not to mention, as posted in a recent thread, that tires and wheels are all unsprung mass, i.e. undampened, thereby hindering traction and handling which can have an effect on fuel consumption.
Old 06-19-2018, 07:40 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
jag1886's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Boise ID
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 41 Posts
Default

My 2011 EcoBoost with a 3.73 gets a little over 17 unloaded and 12 pulling a 5000LBS camper. It doesn't have a lift or over size tires.
Old 06-19-2018, 07:56 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
marshallr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Georgia
Posts: 3,223
Likes: 0
Received 1,287 Likes on 903 Posts
Default

Above 70 mph is like hitting a brick wall. My 14 Supercrew 4X4 with the 5.0 will give me 21 mpg with the cruise control set on 70 on interstate drives. At 75 and faster 18 mpg is the best I can do. I'm using a slightly taller, but narrower than stock tire with an All Terrain tread and stock suspension. Your tires have much more rolling resistance, the lift hurts aerodynamics and driving that fast all add up to poor fuel mileage. Just dropping down to about 70 mph as your top speed will probably give you 2-3 mpg.
Old 06-20-2018, 09:23 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
CoachJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 243
Received 46 Likes on 33 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by marshallr
Above 70 mph is like hitting a brick wall. My 14 Supercrew 4X4 with the 5.0 will give me 21 mpg with the cruise control set on 70 on interstate drives. At 75 and faster 18 mpg is the best I can do. I'm using a slightly taller, but narrower than stock tire with an All Terrain tread and stock suspension. Your tires have much more rolling resistance, the lift hurts aerodynamics and driving that fast all add up to poor fuel mileage. Just dropping down to about 70 mph as your top speed will probably give you 2-3 mpg.
This is exactly my experience in my Ecoboost. I've seen 23 mpg heading East on my 1-1/2 hour trip to Dallas/Fort Worth - it's a slow, steady downgrade. And 21 mpg returning going the same speed. That's going 70.

Going 75, however...I might hit 18-19 on the same trip. I just take off a few minutes earlier if on a schedule and cruise. Doesn't bother me and honestly, I find myself passing others just as much as I get passed, which surprised me when I first started this method.
Old 06-20-2018, 09:58 AM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Eduskator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,305
Received 216 Likes on 183 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jag1886
My 2011 EcoBoost with a 3.73 gets a little over 17 unloaded and 12 pulling a 5000LBS camper. It doesn't have a lift or over size tires.
Add in a lift and 60-70lbs tires, you'll decrease somewhere to 15 as I said, it's perfectly normal.
Old 06-20-2018, 05:39 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
kinerin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Dousman, WI
Posts: 117
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by marshallr
Above 70 mph is like hitting a brick wall. My 14 Supercrew 4X4 with the 5.0 will give me 21 mpg with the cruise control set on 70 on interstate drives. At 75 and faster 18 mpg is the best I can do. I'm using a slightly taller, but narrower than stock tire with an All Terrain tread and stock suspension. Your tires have much more rolling resistance, the lift hurts aerodynamics and driving that fast all add up to poor fuel mileage. Just dropping down to about 70 mph as your top speed will probably give you 2-3 mpg.
My experience also. 2013 XLT Scab, 6.5 bed, Eco, 3:31 gears. Max trailer tow package.

2 recent tow experiences:

27' Layton TT, app 6800lbs, Two tows app 300mi each. Averaged 11.9 mpg overall. Truck towed trailer just fine.

12' U-haul open trailer w/ HD Dyna Wide Glide and BMW K1200S. 3800lbs total tow weight. 600mi tow. Averaged 13.2mpg.

Anything over 70mph (1600rpm) and mileage goes south in a big hurry. I think a lot of it has to do with aerodynamics. These rigs aren't streamlined to begin with. As speed increases, wind resistance increases exponentionally.
Old 06-20-2018, 06:04 PM
  #18  
F150 Forum
 
Livernois Motorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Dearborn Heights, MI
Posts: 2,049
Received 546 Likes on 334 Posts
Default

Having larger tires on the truck usually hurts MPG and performance a bit form the larger rotating mass. Have you ever considered custom tuning? We offer some phenomenal tunes for these EcoBoost trucks that help to improve performance and most customers also report an average of 1 to 2 MPG better than stock, some even more. We offer towing tunes, performance tunes, MPG tunes, and even more aggressive tunes for things like race fuel and E-85 with the correct supporting modifications. Our Mycal tuning device also allows you to adjust the tire size and gear ratio calculations in case your truck was not calibrated for the correct tire size which could throw off the average MPG calculator and odometer as well.

Another thing many EcoBoost owners are not taking into account is that these 3.5L Engines were really designed for use with 91 plus octane premium fuel as mentioned in the owners manual. This is especially so on when using the truck for sever duty use including towing and hauling. So running low octane has been proven to lose anywhere from 12%-15% of Ford's advertised HP ratings and the mileage suffers on low octane as well. This is because the engine has to pull back power based off of knock counts and many other reports when it's ran on low octane fuels. So often times stepping up to premium fuel alone can help the MPG, and then a custom tune for premium fuel could take it up even higher as well.

Here's a link to the tuner on our website for more information as well. https://www.livernoismotorsports.com/product/LPP631102
Old 06-23-2018, 12:12 PM
  #19  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
daleboot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

THX everyone, sorry was out of town for the a bit.

Sounding like I am where I should be with the setup. Didn't think 70 to 75 mph made that much of difference but will give it a try as well.

Will consider taking the lift of and switching the tire size, it sounds crazy to me now, but I could almost careless about a lift and bigger tires these days. Would much rather have the better mpg. I do still tow a heavy load occasionally so would probably stay with a LT tire. Now need to decide if the 20" wheel, 17", or 18" wheel is the way to go. Does one with the stock tire size weigh significantly less and help with the mpg?

At first wasn't considering a tune, but may consider that.... still pretty hesitant on that. Thought my days of performance mods were behind me. Really doesn't interested my unless it helps my mpg or keeps it the same and gives me some more torque/power that will put less of a load on things when towing(which I assume would help mpg or at least put less strain/wear on stuff)
Old 06-25-2018, 10:04 AM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
bassJAM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 1,601
Received 289 Likes on 236 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by daleboot
THX everyone, sorry was out of town for the a bit.

Sounding like I am where I should be with the setup. Didn't think 70 to 75 mph made that much of difference but will give it a try as well.

Will consider taking the lift of and switching the tire size, it sounds crazy to me now, but I could almost careless about a lift and bigger tires these days. Would much rather have the better mpg. I do still tow a heavy load occasionally so would probably stay with a LT tire. Now need to decide if the 20" wheel, 17", or 18" wheel is the way to go. Does one with the stock tire size weigh significantly less and help with the mpg?

At first wasn't considering a tune, but may consider that.... still pretty hesitant on that. Thought my days of performance mods were behind me. Really doesn't interested my unless it helps my mpg or keeps it the same and gives me some more torque/power that will put less of a load on things when towing(which I assume would help mpg or at least put less strain/wear on stuff)
I used to be all about a lift and larger tires in my younger days. Now with a house and a family to spend money on, dropping money just on the aesthetics of my truck doesn't make much sense. I've also come to realize that lifts and larger tires do very little to affect off-road performance of a daily driver. Either you know what you're doing when you leave the pavement, or you don't.

As to the tune, I didn't see any mileage gains when I installed mine, I spent 4 weeks driving each tune I purchased (87 tow/perf, 89 tow/perf, 93 tow/perf, 93 performance) and my mileage stayed pretty flat through them all. There are certainly power gains though, and they are very noticeable with the high octane tunes. Of course, the cost of high octane fuel is going to hurt your wallet.


Quick Reply: 2013 Ecoboost mpg



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:31 PM.