Topic Sponsor
General F150 Discussion General Ford F150 truck discussions and questions
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2013 Ecoboost mpg

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-18-2018, 09:43 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
daleboot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 2013 Ecoboost mpg

Been browsing the forums a bit and found the massive threads and stickies on mpg, they all seem all over the place regarding model, year, engine, etc. So I am hoping I can get a bit of direct feedback on my situation.

Just bought a 2013 Supercrew platinum 4wd 3.5 ecoboost with the shortbed and 3.73 gears with 65,000 miles on it Awesome truck, just quite disappointed in my mpg.

We went on a road trip with the wife and 2 younger kids and a bunch of camping gear in the bed. which was covered with a canvas bed cover. I was doing 70-80 most of the time and was never really heavy with my right foot. We got any where from 14.5-15.5 mpg doing almost totally highway driving. I figured well it was windy and we had a lot of gear, been back for a week now and my wife is driving it to work and back. She is getting around 15mpg and she takes it pretty easy and is about part city and part hwy on her drive.

Before buying the truck and checking posts,talking to friends etc I expected at least a few mpg better than. I already adjusted my mileage for the tire size that is a bit bigger.

The tires are BFG AT2's in an LT so I know that hurts things a bit with the weight, but wouldn't think it would be a ton. Id does also have a small lift(maybe 2")

Is this really what I should expect with the setup I have or is there something way far off that I should start looking into.

THX
Old 06-18-2018, 10:02 PM
  #2  
Senior Citizen Member

 
McLovin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Outside city limits TN
Posts: 4,347
Received 2,707 Likes on 1,548 Posts
Default

I've got a '13 SCrew, 3.5EB, 3.73's with just under 80k miles. Bought it used with 44k miles. I was averaging 16.8 mpg. I changed the plugs and boots at 75k miles and jumped to 18mpg. I run stock sized tires on 20' wheels and I have a tonneau cover. When I changed the plugs( 534's @ .030 ) my gaps were all over the place. Some in the mid to upper .040's.
Change out your plugs and boots and you should see an improvement if they haven't been done already. Ford recommends 100k on the plugs but I think that's absurd.
Also, read up on inter cooler weep hole and do the mod. It's free and will save you some headaches down the road. You can find the info on it right here on this forum!
Hope this helps, Mike
Old 06-19-2018, 09:23 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Joe F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 370
Received 93 Likes on 74 Posts
Default

You also might want to check mpg the old fashioned way. Fill up, drive it, and then see how much it takes to fill it up again compared to how many miles you drove. mi/gal = average mpg. I have a 2013 EB 4WD, leveled, stock wheels/tires, 3.73 rear end, and a 36 gal tank. My dash display short changes me by about 1mpg or so. Over a tank of gas I average around 17.2 with mixed highway/city driving. Recently I moved my daughter across the state for a summer internship and doing those 150 miles loaded up in the back with all of her stuff including a bed and dresser, I averaged 18.3 on the highway (averaging 70-75mph). 18.5 while empty on the way home.

Edit: I am at 59K now and did the plugs/boots plus cleaned all three MAP sensors at about 55K. mpg improvement since has been negligible.

Last edited by Joe F; 06-19-2018 at 11:29 AM.
Old 06-19-2018, 09:40 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
schmenke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 570
Received 111 Likes on 81 Posts

Default

With everything you've described (3.73 gear ratio, full load, heavier wheels/tires, lift kit, wind, 80mph...) that doesn't sound unrealistic at all.
Old 06-19-2018, 10:00 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
bassJAM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 1,601
Received 289 Likes on 236 Posts
Default

With a lift and oversized tires yes, that's about what you should expect. The lower rear gear probably doesn't help much, but the lift and tires are doing the most damage.

That being said, after I drove my ecoboost for a 3-4 months I saw my mileage improve a couple mpg's. You can't drive it like a naturally aspirated vehicle, I can't really explain it but once I learned how the engine behaved and adjusted my driving style I started doing a little better. Also, stay below 75 mph on the highway. If I cruise at 72 I can do around 19-20 mpg (strictly straight level highway on 2 hour road trips) but I drop to 16 once I get close to 80. My hand calculated average for the past 18 months has been 17 mpg with about a 30/70 city/highway mix. I do a little better in the summer, and a little worse in the winter since I let my truck warm up for 5-10 minutes every morning once the lows drop below 40°F.
Old 06-19-2018, 10:42 AM
  #6  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
daleboot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ok... 60K seems early to be looking at plugs, but Ill pull a few to make sure. I guess being a turbo engine it could be a bit different,but seems like most all newer cars/trucks are easliy going 100k plus on plugs.

Checked mileage by hand and would have more exact numbers, but hadn't at the time figured how much my speedo was off with the bigger tires. So I wasn't going just off the computer.

Does the lift affect areodynamics that much, I guess if it levels it a bit rather than having the front lower that affects things. Do the actually diameter of the tire cost your mileage much as well or is it mostly that it changes your speedo/odometer and the math needs to be adjusted?

We were probably doing closer to 70-75 most of the time and since we got back my wife is babying the truck and still getting about the same. Seeing more and more posts claiming much better mileage even with 3.73's and a a full load.

schmenke- The truck did come from your neck of the woods and we are outside of salt lake city, so I am guessing climate/elevation are not much different.

Anything usually done different on Canadain trucks with the computer programming or fuel used up there. Maybe just need a few more tanks for things to adjust better. , THX
Old 06-19-2018, 11:07 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
frosty19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 221
Received 26 Likes on 22 Posts

Default

My '13 FX4 with the ecoboost, stock size tires and ride height with regular weekly driving gets around 13.5L/100km (17mpg) at roughly 60% highway/40% city driving right now. Its probably time for plugs and an air filter soon (145k km, 90k miles) and then I will see what i can get on a highway trip.
This is my second turbo vehicle and wind is a big MPG killer with them I find as they are in and out of boost sporadically to hold a constant speed

Last edited by frosty19; 06-19-2018 at 11:09 AM. Reason: Relevant info added
Old 06-19-2018, 11:17 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Eduskator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,305
Received 216 Likes on 183 Posts
Default

1) Did you hand calculate or rely on the lye-o-meter?

2) 3.73 gears + lift + LT tires = MPG killer. 14-15MPG is in fact normal for your setup.

3) As other said, you might want to change the plugs.

4) Also, proper tire inflation is a must when it comes to saving fuel. Make sure they're inflated as per your specs.

5) 70-80 mph is fast. The faster the speed, the less aerodynamic it is. Try going 60 instead, I'm pretty sure you'll see a nice increase in your MPG.
Old 06-19-2018, 12:16 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
schmenke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 570
Received 111 Likes on 81 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Eduskator
...

5) 70-80 mph is fast. The faster the speed, the less aerodynamic it is. Try going 60 instead, I'm pretty sure you'll see a nice increase in your MPG.
Yep. Let's remember that drag force is proportional to the square of velocity, so your fuel economy will increase exponentially as you increase speed.
Old 06-19-2018, 01:32 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
bassJAM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 1,601
Received 289 Likes on 236 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by daleboot
Does the lift affect areodynamics that much, I guess if it levels it a bit rather than having the front lower that affects things. Do the actually diameter of the tire cost your mileage much as well or is it mostly that it changes your speedo/odometer and the math needs to be adjusted?
Yes, and yes.

I spent a lot of time searching all the threads out there specifically on the fuel mileage hit when I was contemplating a leveling kit and oversize tires. Seems a 1-2 mpg hit from a lift is common, and a 1-2 mpg hit from larger tires is common. I drive 20k miles a year, so a 2-4 mpg loss was enough to stop me from changing my trucks stance.

The lift hurts your aerodynamics and forces your truck to work harder to push air out of the way. You're letting more air under the truck which creates more drag on all the nooks and crannies down there. There's a reason modern trucks have those huge air damns that lower your ground clearance.

The larger tires hurt in three ways ways; 1) they are heavier and make your engine work harder to turn them. 2) they have a larger diameter and make your engine work harder to turn them. 3) they often have all terrain or mud terrain tread patterns with higher rolling resistance, which yep, makes your engine work harder to turn them.


Quick Reply: 2013 Ecoboost mpg



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:46 PM.