Topic Sponsor
Super Duty Forum Talk about Super Duty and Heavy Duty Ford trucks here.

HP, Torque question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 6, 2016 | 09:40 PM
  #21  
Willard5.0's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 536
Likes: 92
From: Middle Tennessee
Default

It would be much cheaper to re-gear your current truck than jumping into a new one. A 3.73 or 4.10 ratio would help immensely with towing at a fraction of the cost.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2016 | 10:54 PM
  #22  
BAM298's Avatar
Somethin' Bout a Truck...
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 393
Likes: 52
From: Columbus, Ohio
Default

What gears are in your truck now?

What are you towing that is 7k lbs?

How are you towing it?

There's a lot of factors in towing something, more than just brute power.

I tow my ~6500lb boat just fine with my truck that has the 5.0l and 3.55's but I don't use cruise control when in the mountains.
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2016 | 06:03 AM
  #23  
w0lvez's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,267
Likes: 85
From: Behind You
Default

Using Smaller Tires & Wheels is the Best Option. It will also make your vehicle more fuel efficient especially in city driving.

When using larger or smaller than OE tires, the PCM needs to be
re-program to correct the speedometer to shift correctly.

The Heavier E150(Wheel 15") can tow much better than F150(wheel 17")
(same engine, transmission & axle) You will not see a huge difference when the AC is ON because E150 4.6 V8 don't have a Wide Open Throttle (WOT) relay to disengage the AC Compressor. E150 is more fuel efficient than F150.

Look at the chart below
Attached Thumbnails HP, Torque question-image.jpg  

Last edited by w0lvez; Jun 7, 2016 at 06:31 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2016 | 01:20 PM
  #24  
tooadvanced's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 164
Likes: 20
Default

Deleted post
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2016 | 07:02 PM
  #25  
Floridaguy80's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 901
Likes: 44
From: Florida
Default

Looks like I may have come across a deal!
2014 F250 crew cab Lariat. Fully loaded, leather, sunroof 6.2 gas, 4x4 and 3.73 rear axle. $41k
....... It has 1700 (seventeen hundred) miles on her!
It's not a diesel, but damn, this has to be a steal!
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2016 | 08:36 AM
  #26  
tooadvanced's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 164
Likes: 20
Default

Originally Posted by Floridaguy80
Looks like I may have come across a deal!
2014 F250 crew cab Lariat. Fully loaded, leather, sunroof 6.2 gas, 4x4 and 3.73 rear axle. $41k
....... It has 1700 (seventeen hundred) miles on her!
It's not a diesel, but damn, this has to be a steal!
Doesn't sound too bad. If you want a diesel keep looking. I just got a 11 fx4 crew cab for 29k. It has 102k on it but was driven by a 70+ year old couple with all maintenance done at dealer. I saw them trading it in. Not a single oil spot or anything under her.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2016 | 07:47 AM
  #27  
Loki 5.0's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 605
Likes: 32
Default

Originally Posted by w0lvez
Ford is using rear wheel torque not engine torque. Overhead Cam engine don't make low end torque. A muscle car with Overhead Valve engine Like Dodge Challenger SRT Hellcat can tow much better. An Overhead Cam engine needs a very huge gear to have a low end torque. The reason why all truck today are automatic is because it needs a Torque Converter to multiply Engine's Torque
BS, Low end torque is easier to achieve with a dual overhead cam with variable cam timing, never seen that on a overhead valve. The 5.0 has more low end torque in a truck than car, it's how they design the cam profile not that overhead cams produce less torque. The Dodge Challenger SRT Hellcat makes more torque because it's supercharged, not because it is overhead valve. Put a supercharger on a ford 6.2 and it's by-by ecoboost.

Last edited by Loki 5.0; Jun 11, 2016 at 07:49 AM.
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:08 PM.