1978 351m or 360?
I have 2 trucks, one with a 360 and one with a 351m. Just wondering which engine should I go with? I am leaning towards the 351m. Seems to be able to find more aftermarket parts for it. The 360 doesn't seem to be as popular in the aftermarket. Also I have a four speed with the 351m and am wondering if a c4 or a c6 would bolt up? The four speed has bull low for first gear and I will be doing mostly highway driving. I think if I go auto I will be putting in lower rear end gears aswell. Anyones imput/advice would be great.
A 351M-C6-ford 9" rear end would be a pretty good drivetrain from two standpoints, power and durability.
You can build good power in those engines reliably, and the C6 and 9" will handle it easily.
You can build good power in those engines reliably, and the C6 and 9" will handle it easily.
The 351m/400 engine is by far less demanding on a persons experience to work on. I have a 360/390 with a C-6 and it is horrible on gas, but I'm not saying the 351M/400 is any better. The 360/390 did come with 4 barrel carbs, so that is an option. As I commented on earlier, if you are new to twisting wrenches, the 351M/400 engine is sweet and very forgiving to work on. According to others they make great boat anchors.
Thanks guys. I was kinda leaning the way "postal" said. I was thinking of ordering an easy kit from jegs for the motor: http://www.jegs.com/i/Edelbrock/350/2171PK/10001/-1
Along with headers and true dual exhaust this engine should breathe a little easier. With the c-6 instead of my 4 speed I should be able to go with 3.73 in the rear end and have a good reliable daily driver... right? As far as my wrenching experience... I don't have alot of in depth on engines or transmissions. But being a machinist helps to understand technical manuals and drawings. Like a friend of mine says all the time. "If it's man made, man can fix it." Hopefully I can lean on you guys for some advice from time to time.
Along with headers and true dual exhaust this engine should breathe a little easier. With the c-6 instead of my 4 speed I should be able to go with 3.73 in the rear end and have a good reliable daily driver... right? As far as my wrenching experience... I don't have alot of in depth on engines or transmissions. But being a machinist helps to understand technical manuals and drawings. Like a friend of mine says all the time. "If it's man made, man can fix it." Hopefully I can lean on you guys for some advice from time to time.
"If it's man made, man can fix it." Thats what my father-in-law always said. He was a strong influence on me. My father, a machinist also, could recite the decimals in 64ths of an inch, and he only had a third grade education, can anyone do that today with out a computor?
I'm sure you could handle either engine, what ever your choice, remember one thing, A big block Ford is an awseome machine with stats to back it up.
I'm sure you could handle either engine, what ever your choice, remember one thing, A big block Ford is an awseome machine with stats to back it up.
The 351m/400 engine is by far less demanding on a persons experience to work on. I have a 360/390 with a C-6 and it is horrible on gas, but I'm not saying the 351M/400 is any better. The 360/390 did come with 4 barrel carbs, so that is an option. As I commented on earlier, if you are new to twisting wrenches, the 351M/400 engine is sweet and very forgiving to work on. According to others they make great boat anchors.
Bill how'd you get a 4bbl. on your 360? or is a 390?
no intention of stealing this thread...just curious.






