Topic Sponsor
Performance, Tuning, and (LEGAL) Racing Post discussions about increasing performance, capabilities, and racing. ****WARNING**** Street racing or illegal activities will be removed and potential bans will be handed out.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Virtual Dyno

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 27, 2020 | 09:18 PM
  #31  
Ecks's Avatar
Thread Starter
5 Year Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 2,092
Likes: 812
From: S.TX.
Default

Originally Posted by JustOutaReach
LOL, I just used a paint program to put a text box over the top... I tried to find where to change it but I couldn’t.
haha nice.. thought you found some hidden options lol
Still a good work around
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2020 | 09:51 PM
  #32  
Dapepper9's Avatar
5 Year Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 1,149
Likes: 713
From: Sioux City, IA
Default

I was finally able to get some more logs today with the smaller tires and it’s doing the thing again where I’m getting resists of 6000+hp
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2020 | 09:56 PM
  #33  
Ecks's Avatar
Thread Starter
5 Year Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 2,092
Likes: 812
From: S.TX.
Default

Originally Posted by Dapepper9
I was finally able to get some more logs today with the smaller tires and it’s doing the thing again where I’m getting resists of 6000+hp
post your csv file and truck info so we can see what's going on
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2020 | 10:05 PM
  #34  
Dapepper9's Avatar
5 Year Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 1,149
Likes: 713
From: Sioux City, IA
Default

Originally Posted by Ecks
post your csv file and truck info so we can see what's going on
This log is 3rd gear WOT and I don't know why it's reading different than the other. ported tb, Edelbrock manifold, longtubes, 265/70/17 tires, Omega tune

Edit: I think I mixed up the config files so that might be it lol
Attached Files
File Type: csv
VictorV1 E85 WOT 2000-6500.csv (1.19 MB, 103 views)

Last edited by Dapepper9; Jul 27, 2020 at 10:13 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2020 | 10:52 PM
  #35  
Ecks's Avatar
Thread Starter
5 Year Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 2,092
Likes: 812
From: S.TX.
Default

Originally Posted by Dapepper9
This log is 3rd gear WOT and I don't know why it's reading different than the other. ported tb, Edelbrock manifold, longtubes, 265/70/17 tires, Omega tune

Edit: I think I mixed up the config files so that might be it lol
Try this file..
There was a formatting issue on two of the rpm cells.
Attached Files
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2020 | 10:56 PM
  #36  
JustOutaReach's Avatar
...or just Dave
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 285
Likes: 300
From: East-Central Illinois
Default

Originally Posted by Dapepper9
This log is 3rd gear WOT and I don't know why it's reading different than the other. ported tb, Edelbrock manifold, longtubes, 265/70/17 tires, Omega tune

Edit: I think I mixed up the config files so that might be it lol
looks like there’s a flake in your RPM data... that would certainly mess with the graph. You could try deleting those two rows from the csv, then posting it again.



EDIT: I was 4 minutes late...

Last edited by JustOutaReach; Jul 27, 2020 at 11:01 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2020 | 11:03 PM
  #37  
Ecks's Avatar
Thread Starter
5 Year Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 2,092
Likes: 812
From: S.TX.
Default

Originally Posted by JustOutaReach
looks like there’s a flake in your RPM data... that would certainly mess with the graph. You could try deleting those two rows from the csv, then posting it again.



EDIT: I was 4 minutes late...
Great minds think alike lol
I just changed the format of those two cells in excel from scientific to general and over wrote the number to 6051. Should be good to go.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2020 | 11:05 AM
  #38  
Dapepper9's Avatar
5 Year Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 1,149
Likes: 713
From: Sioux City, IA
Default

Originally Posted by Ecks
Great minds think alike lol
I just changed the format of those two cells in excel from scientific to general and over wrote the number to 6051. Should be good to go.
Thanks guys! I never would have thought of that. That fixed the issue 100%. Here's that run laid over with the other 2.
These are all set to a rough 6100lb estimate + 150lb driver (yeah I know, I'm little lol). Drag set to a 0.46 guess and 36 sqft frontal area
Green- JLT, ported stock tb, Boss, longtubes, 3" catless exhaust, e85, 275/60r20
Blue- JLT, 90mm BBK tb, Edelbrock Victor II manifold, longtubes, 3" catless exhaust, 91 octane, 275/60r20
Red- JLT, ported stock tb, Edelbrock Victor II manifold, longtubes, 3" catless exhaust, e85, 265/70r17

Considering the virtual dyno has some tire size adjustment calculated into the readout, I would think thats accurate-ish. Oz didn't want to tune with the BBK installed and that's understandable with the the reliability record of the things. At least for these Gen 1 trucks though, this Edelbrock manifold seems to be a really good option in terms of performance. Price is another discussion though lol

Reply
Old Jul 29, 2020 | 10:11 AM
  #39  
JustOutaReach's Avatar
...or just Dave
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 285
Likes: 300
From: East-Central Illinois
Default

Originally Posted by Ecks
Oh yeah, and this might have happened once..
Not sure how I glossed over this... LOL what did you do?
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2020 | 12:05 PM
  #40  
Ecks's Avatar
Thread Starter
5 Year Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 2,092
Likes: 812
From: S.TX.
Default

Originally Posted by JustOutaReach
Not sure how I glossed over this... LOL what did you do?
Ha that was on my last track pass at the peak of first gear. I have 2nd gear launch now and way past due for upgraded trans clutches.
HP Tuners showed 900 in 4th and 860 in 5th which sounds about right.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:23 AM.