Topic Sponsor
2015 - 2020 Ford F150 General discussion on the 13th generation Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Worksport

V8 Ecoboost ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 19, 2020 | 11:22 AM
  #1  
Pete Roszell's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 61
Likes: 23
Default V8 Ecoboost ?

Do you guys think Ford will come out with a V8 EcoBoost ? I love my 3.5.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2020 | 11:56 AM
  #2  
robbgt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 1,033
Likes: 697
Default

No
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2020 | 12:01 PM
  #3  
jedinachos.old's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 23
Likes: 13
From: Yukon,Canada
Default

Originally Posted by Pete Roszell
Do you guys think Ford will come out with a V8 EcoBoost ? I love my 3.5.
I don't think that would make sense. I would rather them come out with a second diesel option instead. But we all now the answer is the next one will be electric right?
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2020 | 12:04 PM
  #4  
Gene K's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,880
Likes: 707
Default

They came really close. The final decision was to go Supercharged on the GT500 again.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2020 | 12:06 PM
  #5  
Flamingtaco's Avatar
5 Year Member
Veteran: Marine Corp
5 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 9,099
Likes: 3,211
From: Kentucky
Default

No. The whole point of the ecoboost program is to provide bigger engine power at smaller engine efficiencies.

The current cyclone block was designed for as much as 4.0L of displacement. Using the 2020 Raptor's numbers, this means the engine can scale to 515hp, 583lb-ft (a bit less due to losses), without any stroking or other neat tricks. As it stands, the Ford GT gets 660hp and 550lb-ft from 3.5L. Scale THAT bad boy up to 4.0L, you get 755hp, 629lb-ft.

They have gone beyond the original intent (V8 power at V6 efficiency) and are producing big block power in engines that can still be operated efficiently. Building a V8 ecoboost would be opposite of the purpose of the program, and you definitely don't need a V8 to make the power any more. Ford is actually moving in the opposite direction... I would expect to see a 4-cyl F150 that makes decent enough power within two generations. Mercedes has a 2.0 making 416hp, 369lb-ft. The Focus RS made 350hp/350lb-ft. Develop a stronger block and higher thermal capacity cooling system, you can move an engine like that into the F150.

Why not V8? More moving parts, more friction. Ford has built small V8's with high tech (ex. 3.4L SHO), and likely surmised there is no good reason other than exhaust note to go with the V8 format in boosted engines. A V4 or V6 has fewer parts, a smaller horizontal footprint, weighs less, and bumps the CAFE numbers, with or without boost.

Last edited by Flamingtaco; Jun 19, 2020 at 12:08 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2020 | 02:14 PM
  #6  
acsart3's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 131
Likes: 43
From: Norcal
Default

BMW have a V8 twin turbo that doesn pretty good MPG.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2020 | 03:10 PM
  #7  
TheNewsMan's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 38
Likes: 6
From: SW MI
Default

Originally Posted by Flamingtaco
No. The whole point of the ecoboost program is to provide bigger engine power at smaller engine efficiencies.

The current cyclone block was designed for as much as 4.0L of displacement. Using the 2020 Raptor's numbers, this means the engine can scale to 515hp, 583lb-ft (a bit less due to losses), without any stroking or other neat tricks. As it stands, the Ford GT gets 660hp and 550lb-ft from 3.5L. Scale THAT bad boy up to 4.0L, you get 755hp, 629lb-ft.

They have gone beyond the original intent (V8 power at V6 efficiency) and are producing big block power in engines that can still be operated efficiently. Building a V8 ecoboost would be opposite of the purpose of the program, and you definitely don't need a V8 to make the power any more. Ford is actually moving in the opposite direction... I would expect to see a 4-cyl F150 that makes decent enough power within two generations. Mercedes has a 2.0 making 416hp, 369lb-ft. The Focus RS made 350hp/350lb-ft. Develop a stronger block and higher thermal capacity cooling system, you can move an engine like that into the F150.

Why not V8? More moving parts, more friction. Ford has built small V8's with high tech (ex. 3.4L SHO), and likely surmised there is no good reason other than exhaust note to go with the V8 format in boosted engines. A V4 or V6 has fewer parts, a smaller horizontal footprint, weighs less, and bumps the CAFE numbers, with or without boost.
Would a V4 have the torque needed for a truck?
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2020 | 06:40 PM
  #8  
isthatahemi's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 4,041
Likes: 1,117
Default

A small ecoboost V8 would be sweet. Sound and power, but it is likely not to be.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2020 | 06:57 PM
  #9  
Pokes's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 473
Likes: 333
Default

Originally Posted by TheNewsMan
Would a V4 have the torque needed for a truck?
The way most people use their trucks, yes.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2020 | 11:08 PM
  #10  
mopar1970's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 564
Likes: 158
Default

First thing that popped in my head was a single turbo On3 system.

Yeah, it doesn't have that symmetrical goodness of a dual turbo setup but GIANT SNAIL.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:02 AM.