Topic Sponsor
2015 - 2020 Ford F150 General discussion on the 13th generation Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Worksport

Time to replace?!?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 1, 2023 | 07:44 AM
  #21  
BadAV's Avatar
No fart cans allowed
10 Year Member
Photoriffic
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 4,336
Likes: 2,361
From: MO
Default

Originally Posted by Wvolland
Because my wife is worried that one of our coil on plugs will crap out between Florida and Denver (5 new Standards and 1 Sorenson), she wonders if it’s time to trade in the 2016 XLT (110K) for a newer F-150 or a Ram……..
Same comment as others. Replace a truck because your wife is afraid a coil will fail on a trip! Either replace the coils with OEM or buy a couple of OEM coils and take the tools required to change them. Or buy that new truck because you really want it and are using the wife as an excuse. 🤷
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2023 | 10:03 AM
  #22  
N4HHE's Avatar
5 Year Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 1,660
Likes: 697
From: Madison, AL
Default

Originally Posted by BadAV
Same comment as others. Replace a truck because your wife is afraid a coil will fail on a trip! Either replace the coils with OEM or buy a couple of OEM coils and take the tools required to change them. Or buy that new truck because you really want it and are using the wife as an excuse. 🤷
Might as well buy a new truck because the tire pressure is low.
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2023 | 10:55 AM
  #23  
kendive's Avatar
Community Team
Veteran: Air Force
10 Year Member
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 2,606
Likes: 554
From: Florida
Default


I love reading the comments.

LOL.
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2023 | 02:23 PM
  #24  
N4HHE's Avatar
5 Year Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 1,660
Likes: 697
From: Madison, AL
Default

Originally Posted by kendive
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Ab1GdywTW8

I love reading the comments.

LOL.
Ford is doing fine. The Trump tax cuts allow immediate costing of production investments, which these investments appear as losses when they exceed profits. In the past companies had to write things off amortized over as long as 20 years.

The CEO's EV trip was with a CCS Lightning. The government subsidized CCS "charging infrastructure" sucks while Tesla's non-subsidized Superchargers are superlative and more plentiful. Hence, Ford and GM have announced they are abandoning CCS in favor of Tesla's NACS. Should have done that back in 2010 or before when Tesla tried to give NACS to the SAE/ANSI committee but they wouldn't have it. Back then the bureaucratic geniuses did not believe DC charging would be necessary for EVs. They thought "80 miles is enough". And didn't want AC and DC on the same pins because a DC switch costs much more than an AC switch. Today we know an EV must have DC charging, and how running two sets of connectors and two sets of wiring (and separate AC and DC switches) to the inverter costs much more than the added cost of a DC switch, which you have to have anyway on the DC side. Tesla's NACS puts AC and DC on the same pins, and is physically smaller than the AC-only J1772 plug.
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2023 | 04:31 PM
  #25  
picaFord's Avatar
Senior Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 276
Likes: 154
Default

I just saw the head of a nail in my tire... should I replace my truck now?



jk
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2023 | 04:32 PM
  #26  
artsr2002's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 14,589
Likes: 8,786
From: My House
Default

Did we run off the OP?
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2023 | 04:38 PM
  #27  
Taggart's Avatar
Captain of Industry
Veteran: Navy
Community Builder
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,610
Likes: 2,260
From: Arklahoma
Default

Originally Posted by artsr2002
Did we run off the OP?
I'd guess he was just trolling for interesting answers, but I've known more than one woman who thought a vehicle needed to be replaced with a new one when the first repair was needed.
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2023 | 06:21 PM
  #28  
artsr2002's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 14,589
Likes: 8,786
From: My House
Default

Checked his posts. He's posted a couple of other times in other threads but no more here. Lol
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2023 | 01:40 PM
  #29  
kendive's Avatar
Community Team
Veteran: Air Force
10 Year Member
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 2,606
Likes: 554
From: Florida
Default

Originally Posted by N4HHE
Ford is doing fine. The Trump tax cuts allow immediate costing of production investments, which these investments appear as losses when they exceed profits. In the past companies had to write things off amortized over as long as 20 years.

The CEO's EV trip was with a CCS Lightning. The government subsidized CCS "charging infrastructure" sucks while Tesla's non-subsidized Superchargers are superlative and more plentiful. Hence, Ford and GM have announced they are abandoning CCS in favor of Tesla's NACS. Should have done that back in 2010 or before when Tesla tried to give NACS to the SAE/ANSI committee but they wouldn't have it. Back then the bureaucratic geniuses did not believe DC charging would be necessary for EVs. They thought "80 miles is enough". And didn't want AC and DC on the same pins because a DC switch costs much more than an AC switch. Today we know an EV must have DC charging, and how running two sets of connectors and two sets of wiring (and separate AC and DC switches) to the inverter costs much more than the added cost of a DC switch, which you have to have anyway on the DC side. Tesla's NACS puts AC and DC on the same pins, and is physically smaller than the AC-only J1772 plug.
Great post thanks. I would not own an EV car or truck. I like the hybrids better. I don't care for Fords Hybrids at all.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2023 | 02:27 PM
  #30  
JetFixxxer's Avatar
Senior Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 360
Likes: 94
From: Plymouth, M*******chusetts
Default

I would be all over a Lightning if they weren't so damn high in price, plus the 25% increase in insurance. That negates the savings. My ICE F150 serves me well and at one point once they get the range worked out and insurance drops in price I will switch over or keep the iCE and get an EV.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:35 PM.