Topic Sponsor
2015 - 2020 Ford F150 General discussion on the 13th generation Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Worksport

Regular cab

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 6, 2015 | 03:32 PM
  #11  
mechanicboy's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,333
Likes: 273
From: Northern CA
Default

You will mainly see better city fuel economy as there's less weight to accelerate but hwy will be better too. If losing weight didn't increase fuel economy for wouldn't be using aluminum to save weight!

And for you looking for a modern lightning, definitely get a RCSB. I would get a 4x4 so I could get traction under almost any conditions that would leave rwd spinning for days.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2015 | 03:39 PM
  #12  
Nick@JDM's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 42
Likes: 6
Default

Originally Posted by mechanicboy
You will mainly see better city fuel economy as there's less weight to accelerate but hwy will be better too. If losing weight didn't increase fuel economy for wouldn't be using aluminum to save weight!

And for you looking for a modern lightning, definitely get a RCSB. I would get a 4x4 so I could get traction under almost any conditions that would leave rwd spinning for days.
Coming from a 600whp Mustang I will make the 2wd work lol. I just want someone to tell me when these darn things will be built. I have heard mid April all the way to June 6th...pretty big gap!
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2015 | 03:53 PM
  #13  
StevieP65's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 549
Likes: 141
From: Coastal NC
Default

Regular Cab isn't available in Lariat or higher. Gotta stay with XLT or below.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2015 | 05:40 PM
  #14  
Tbrown87's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 115
Likes: 3
Default

I agree though, I like the blacked out grill on them. I wish I didnt have to upgrade to a sport package to get that same look
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2015 | 06:44 PM
  #15  
mjf6175's Avatar
Member
10 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 43
Likes: 23
From: NJ
Default

Everyone has a preference and mine is a RC. I have absolutely no need for a rear seat. But even more important is that I do have a need for an 8ft bed AND the maximum payload I can get. A regular cab with the heavy duty payload pkg, 4x4, and 3.5Eco has a payload capacity of 3030lbs. That is F250 territory. Which is why I am seriously considering a new F150 instead of SD.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2015 | 09:34 PM
  #16  
LSchicago's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 1,300
Likes: 198
Default

MPG ratings are the same, but weighing 500 pounds less will get some extra MPG. My 13 RCSB gets better than rated if driven easy. The 15's don't have as much space behind the seat as the 09-14's. My 13 has a lot of space behind the seats. Enough for our suitcases and cooler when traveling. The regular cabs have a much sportier feel, and are quicker. They handle & maneuver better too. If you don't NEED the extra seats don't waste the money.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2015 | 10:29 PM
  #17  
Velosprout's Avatar
10 Year Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 213
From: East Central Illinois
Default

The intended use of the vehicle is what I would consider the primary consideration; mileage and resale value would be secondary.


As one who formerly used pickup trucks for work only (farming), I would prefer the longbed regular cab for a work truck. There is full space and payload for seed corn, hog feed, livestock racks, parts, portable fuel tanks, welders, and tool boxes. It was rare there was need for any more than three passengers; if so they rode in the bed. The trucks were covered with dust, manure, sweat, grease, and mud, so they weren't used for regular family transportation.


Today my truck is primarily a daily use vehicle in a sales profession, family hauler, recreational vehicle (towing a camper or boat or loaded with bicycles), and is occasionally used for transporting materials and tools in maintaining rental properties. The SuperCrew is now a necessity for me.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2015 | 10:36 PM
  #18  
EcoBoostedF100's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 262
Likes: 41
From: Sunny Arizona
Default

Originally Posted by Nick@JDM
I ordered a regular cab mostly for the cost and the weight since I want to build a modern day "Lightning" truck.

The only problem with a regular cab right now is that no one can tell me when production will start on them or when I can expect my order to be filled : /
Production started nearly a month ago!

I know of 2 trucks in particular that are built sitting at plant waiting to be shipped. Patiently waiting . .

Another no VIN yet that was ordered early november.

Same here modern day Lightning . .

I know the 5.0 RCSB are on hold but the 2.7 eco's are being built

A lot of TSB's already on the 2015 F150's

I suspect the RCSB are being held for some reason . .
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2015 | 10:39 PM
  #19  
tantrum007's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 65
Likes: 7
Default

Going in tomorrow to order (or try to order) the 2015 2.7 RC 6.5 XLT. Will keep you updated.

Until then...

Anyone else have any nice looking Regular Cab pics?

(not mine)
Attached Images  
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2015 | 10:40 PM
  #20  
EcoBoostedF100's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 262
Likes: 41
From: Sunny Arizona
Default

Originally Posted by tantrum007
Just wish this was still the style with the cab.
Twin to one I ordered that is BUILT but sitting awaiting shipment.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:19 PM.