Topic Sponsor
2015 - 2020 Ford F150 General discussion on the 13th generation Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Worksport

Plugs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 25, 2021 | 12:08 PM
  #1  
Ace27's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 6
Likes: 4
Default Plugs

I have 2018 3.5 Eco with the SP-550 plugs from factory. I also have a set of SP-534 plugs left from my old 2011 3.5. Would there be any reason I shouldn't use the 534's in the 2018 3.5? I had a look at the owners manual and it recommends the SP-534's and not the 550's?
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2021 | 09:03 PM
  #2  
HD Pilot's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 87
Likes: 15
From: N. Texas
Default

I just did a change on my 2015 3.5 Ecoboost, I put in the SP-580s as they are supposed to be the replacements for the SP-534s. I imagine the SP-534s would still be OK, but the job is a bit of a pain so why not put in the SP-580s?
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2021 | 12:25 AM
  #3  
McObra's Avatar
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 131
Likes: 53
Default

Although both trucks have 3.5L engines, I believe the '18 truck has a second generation engine as opposed to the '11 trucks first gen engine. I'd verify that the plugs are compatible before using the '11 plugs in the '18 engine.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2021 | 06:30 AM
  #4  
SSellers's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,763
Likes: 1,082
From: SC
Default

Looking around, they changed from the 534 to the 550 mid-production at some point. Same plug, just the 550 is gapped 0.028" vs 0.030" for the 534. Maybe they found the plugs were wearing a little faster in the newer engine than they wanted so went with a smaller starting gap so they'd stay in range longer. To throw more confusion in, the current manual printing calls for SP-578 and gap 0.028"-0.031".
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2021 | 08:39 AM
  #5  
C17chief's Avatar
5 Year Member
5 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 352
Likes: 62
Default

Originally Posted by SSellers
Looking around, they changed from the 534 to the 550 mid-production at some point. Same plug, just the 550 is gapped 0.028" vs 0.030" for the 534. Maybe they found the plugs were wearing a little faster in the newer engine than they wanted so went with a smaller starting gap so they'd stay in range longer. To throw more confusion in, the current manual printing calls for SP-578 and gap 0.028"-0.031".
gap is only part of the equation. There are the thermal characteristics is well...what you see when people or descriptions mention hotter or colder plugs. You could have issues using a too hot or too cold plug just like incorrect gapping. There could be some differences there between those part numbers, not just gap. Even if so, those differences may not mean much to that engine’s normal operation which might be where the several different part numbers being acceptable comes from. Doesn’t have to be this part is superseded and renamed to that while still being the same old part kinda thing.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2021 | 09:24 AM
  #6  
SSellers's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,763
Likes: 1,082
From: SC
Default

Originally Posted by C17chief
gap is only part of the equation. There are the thermal characteristics is well...what you see when people or descriptions mention hotter or colder plugs. You could have issues using a too hot or too cold plug just like incorrect gapping. There could be some differences there between those part numbers, not just gap. Even if so, those differences may not mean much to that engine’s normal operation which might be where the several different part numbers being acceptable comes from. Doesn’t have to be this part is superseded and renamed to that while still being the same old part kinda thing.
Didn't bother mentioning anything about heat range because as said, they are the same except for gap.
The SP-580 supersedes the SP-534. Those and the 550 are all heat range 1 as indicated by their full part number.
The SP-542 is the colder plug for a 3.5L

Last edited by SSellers; Apr 26, 2021 at 09:26 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2021 | 09:36 AM
  #7  
maco's Avatar
5 Year Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 397
From: Brantford Ontario
Default

FYI : after 2011 Motorcraft plugs are now made by NGK (not autolite)
Something I've noted you will see Japan also printed on the newer plugs.....
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2021 | 10:26 AM
  #8  
thx10's Avatar
5 Year Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 430
Likes: 239
From: MO
Default

Putting SP-580 @ .030 in my non-tuned stock 2016 3.5 Eco today. Based on all my research, these seem to be the appropriate plug.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2021 | 10:27 AM
  #9  
3.3XL4x4's Avatar
Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 55
Likes: 34
From: Chicagoland
Default

Originally Posted by maco
FYI : after 2011 Motorcraft plugs are now made by NGK (not autolite)
Something I've noted you will see Japan also printed on the newer plugs.....
Interesting, but not surprising. Autolite went to China like most of the others. No idea who actually makes them. Bosch plugs (even those marked with other country names) are actually made by Nanjing Huade in China. For at least the last 10 years, Nanjing Huade makes all the pieces and then ship them on containers to the "country of origin" where they are assembled.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2021 | 02:26 PM
  #10  
rightway's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 469
Likes: 117
Default

Save a few dollars, lose thousands, be cautious. Have a warranty, be cautious? Manufactures usually don't change numbers for no reasons. Contact the plug manufacture, if they are the same brand for their advice.

Good Luck
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:06 AM.