Topic Sponsor
2015 - 2020 Ford F150 General discussion on the 13th generation Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

No Eco-boost offered for F-250 SD

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-04-2016, 09:43 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Rupert's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 93
Received 25 Likes on 17 Posts
Default No Eco-boost offered for F-250 SD

The new 2017 F-250 offers a 6.2L V-8 that only makes 430 lb.-ft. of torque. The new 3.5L Eco-boost is making much more torque 470 lb.-ft. of torque. Torque is what is needed for heavy lifting type work that super duty does so why no 3.5L offered?
Old 09-04-2016, 10:00 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
baxzilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 1,160
Received 198 Likes on 139 Posts

Default

If the 150 and Super duty share a motor the Super duty offering always has less power since they detune the motor for longevity. Personally as great as I think the ecoboost platform is for the F150 I don't think they've proven themselves enough yet for the Super duties longevity wise. Maybe I'm wrong.

Also you have to realize that an ecoboost in the super duties would hurt F150 sales and Powerstroke sales. A lot of people would really be rethinking if they need the diesel and more people would be tempted to go into the Super Duties.

Also I don't think the Super Duties are regulated as strictly with MPGs, so not as bit of a rush to increase fuel economy.
The following users liked this post:
Rupert (09-05-2016)
Old 09-04-2016, 10:00 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
5.0GN tow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,162
Received 211 Likes on 167 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Rupert
The new 2017 F-250 offers a 6.2L V-8 that only makes 430 lb.-ft. of torque. The new 3.5L Eco-boost is making much more torque 470 lb.-ft. of torque. Torque is what is needed for heavy lifting type work that super duty does so why no 3.5L offered?
The duty cycle of the SD trucks is much heavier. The eco is a great F150 powerplant, but with the much heavier super duty truck and the work they are used for, the eco would be in boost all the time. This would not be condusive to long life or reasonable fuel economy.
The following users liked this post:
Rupert (09-05-2016)
Old 09-04-2016, 10:26 PM
  #4  
Member
 
5.0nly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 745
Received 108 Likes on 83 Posts
Default

It is not a heavy duty motor. Can it stay running all day long, haul tens of thousands of pounds of payload, etc? That is best suited for N/A V8 motors.
The following users liked this post:
Rupert (09-05-2016)
Old 09-04-2016, 10:40 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
KYBuckeye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 1,344
Received 312 Likes on 227 Posts
Default

GM does the same thing. They have a great 6.2 in the 1500 but use an old 6.0 iron block in the HDs for the same reason stated above.
The following users liked this post:
Rupert (09-05-2016)
Old 09-04-2016, 11:43 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
WTF150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Winfield, IN
Posts: 2,733
Received 627 Likes on 445 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 5.0nly
It is not a heavy duty motor. Can it stay running all day long, haul tens of thousands of pounds of payload, etc? That is best suited for N/A V8 motors.
^this
Old 09-05-2016, 12:21 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
CiDhed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 176
Received 28 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 5.0nly
It is not a heavy duty motor. Can it stay running all day long, haul tens of thousands of pounds of payload, etc? That is best suited for turbo diesel engines.
ftfy.

You described the advantage of diesel over gasoline. There is no evidence to support your claim that the 3.5tt is any less reliable in those situations as the mod v8 engine but judging by your handle you won't agree.
Old 09-05-2016, 12:37 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Smokewagun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 34 Likes on 27 Posts

Default

After going to a 2016 F150 after driving Super Duties since 1999, over 10 of them, I was done with diesels for a while. If I could have bought a Super Duty with a gas mill like a large EcoBoost, I would not have hesitated. The EcoBoost 3.5L is tried and true. Ford beat the snot out of it before it's release. We've all seen the videos. 75% of the HD trucks on the road are pavement queens that are lucky to see a 6,000 load ever. I think Ford could double Super Duty sales if they'd give it an economy mill like an EcoBoost... But market it that way. Guys who haul and need the diesel will buy the diesel, or the 6.2L. The guys who need the weight capacity for a heavy travel trailer, but use it as a daily driver, will buy the EcoBoost.
The following users liked this post:
Jus Cruisin (09-05-2016)
Old 09-05-2016, 12:46 AM
  #9  
J15
Certified Cow Porker
 
J15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 1,323
Received 360 Likes on 246 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CiDhed
ftfy.

You described the advantage of diesel over gasoline. There is no evidence to support your claim that the 3.5tt is any less reliable in those situations as the mod v8 engine but judging by your handle you won't agree.
There is no evidence to support the claim that the most reliable platform on the market is more reliable than a small twin turbo engine that needs to get into boost to make the power needed for HD work?
Old 09-05-2016, 01:03 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
DrillRig52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 2,310
Received 200 Likes on 170 Posts

Default

Here we go.....
The following users liked this post:
tampastx (09-05-2016)


Quick Reply: No Eco-boost offered for F-250 SD



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:12 PM.