Topic Sponsor
2015 - 2020 Ford F150 General discussion on the 13th generation Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Worksport

Fun comparison

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 13, 2019 | 08:53 PM
  #11  
Apples's Avatar
5.0 DOHC V8 | 7.3 Gdzilla
Supporting Member

5 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 3,987
Likes: 2,077
From: California and Utah
Default

Is the chart in Post #2 torque measurements at the drive wheels? and who edits?! this stuff... no way the 2.7 EbBstock output betters the 3.5EB...
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2019 | 11:03 PM
  #12  
scott150's Avatar
5 Year Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 105
Likes: 33
From: Ontario Canada
Default

So 2.7 is fastest 0-60 stock f150, has the most torque stock and most torque tuned.

They need to double check the numbers. Did they get silver trucks mixed up for this test? There’s no way the 3.5 HP is that low.

Dont get me wrong, 2.7 is a great motor and can deliver power, but 3.5 EB is going to deliver more.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2019 | 11:09 PM
  #13  
ghunt81's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 1,098
Likes: 304
From: Clarksburg, WV
Default

Why is there an asterisk after the 3.5 EB numbers that is not explained in the article? Very confusing...

Also I'm thinking they got the stock numbers flipped for the 2.7 and 3.5, that would make more sense and sounds more like correct RWHP numbers.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2019 | 11:22 PM
  #14  
MR G's Avatar
Geek for hire
 
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 448
Likes: 108
From: 00110111 00110001 00110100
Default

Those numbers may be from their dyno test, but are way different from factory ratings. I still think the 2.7 would have been closer or possibly beat the 3.5 by a hair if they ran a a few more passes, at least as far as their tests went.


Reply
Old Apr 14, 2019 | 12:34 AM
  #15  
fordxlt's Avatar
Senior Lurker
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 615
Likes: 158
From: Northern Mn
Default

Originally Posted by Apples
Is the chart in Post #2 torque measurements at the drive wheels? and who edits?! this stuff... no way the 2.7 EbBstock output betters the 3.5EB...
Need to read the graph - the 3.5Eb is around 330 hp stock. Stock torque shows around 405-410. The numbers they used were what the stock engine made @ the Tuned engines peak - RPM wise.
Makes for a more impressive comparison. Interesting that the 2.7 was the 0-60 champ stock. And stock or tuned the 2.7 beats the 5.0 0-60 & 1/4 mile.

Last edited by fordxlt; Apr 14, 2019 at 12:38 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2019 | 12:43 AM
  #16  
fordxlt's Avatar
Senior Lurker
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 615
Likes: 158
From: Northern Mn
Default

They under reported the 2.7 also, it was 316 hp stock. And around 395 ft/lb torque stock @ peak.
The 5.0 hp figures are correct as shown above, but Torque peak is closer to 360 ft/lb stock.

Last edited by fordxlt; Apr 14, 2019 at 12:47 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2019 | 12:45 AM
  #17  
Mark Miller's Avatar
5 Year Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 4,030
Likes: 1,087
Default

Thanks for the Video that 3.5 Eco Boost was a beast with a tune and pretty good stock!!I just think the 2.7 Eco Boost Truck should have also been a Crew Cab like the other 2 trucks not a Super Cab!!

Last edited by Mark Miller; Apr 14, 2019 at 12:47 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2019 | 08:48 AM
  #18  
KrS14's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 619
Likes: 107
From: St Marys, ON
Default

The numbers are funky though. There's no way the stock 3.5L is 6.32 seconds, it's way faster than that.

I wonder if they "detuned" the stock tune lol
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2019 | 09:14 AM
  #19  
2015rubyFX4's Avatar
Senior Member
Supporting Member

5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 1,819
Likes: 366
From: South Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by KrS14
The numbers are funky though. There's no way the stock 3.5L is 6.32 seconds, it's way faster than that.

I wonder if they "detuned" the stock tune lol
exactly as is the 5.0 faster then 6.9 stock. How about axle ratios? They never mentioned it ironically
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2019 | 09:40 AM
  #20  
ModularFord's Avatar
5 Year Member
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 954
Likes: 316
Default

They never mention axle ratios/ different cab configs and I’m sure they tested at high elevation as usual which kills any chance for the 5.0.

5Star is a tuning company therefore they don’t like the V8 because they can’t ram tons of extra air in with turbos. Trucks aren’t about speed though, poorly done test.

Last edited by ModularFord; Apr 14, 2019 at 09:45 AM.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:14 PM.