Topic Sponsor
2015 - 2020 Ford F150 General discussion on the 13th generation Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Is The End In Sight? Ford Plans To Scale Back 5.0L V8 Production At Essex Engine Plan

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-03-2019, 11:25 AM
  #41  
Senior Member
 
ModularFord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 925
Received 295 Likes on 207 Posts
Default

The other thing nobody has thought about is the Mustang sales slump. I’ve read since the 2018 redesign sales have been falling, which means less 5.0s and 2.3 ecoboosts in demand. I think it’s predecessor looked like a sharper car.

I can’t see the 7.3 replacing the 6.2......the 6.2 is a great entry engine for super duty buyers with a lot of punch and is a proven mill. The 7.3 is available all the way down to F-250 though, so it’s not just a V-10 replacement as the V10 wasn’t in a 3/4 ton.

Last edited by ModularFord; 05-03-2019 at 11:28 AM.
Old 05-03-2019, 12:04 PM
  #42  
Senior Member
 
svenny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Florida
Posts: 445
Received 151 Likes on 91 Posts

Default

Shouldn’t the title of this thread be “the end is near?” Instead of “is the end in sight?” This ain’t something to look forward to
Old 05-03-2019, 12:17 PM
  #43  
Senior Member
 
cthusker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Northwest Connecticut
Posts: 1,675
Received 430 Likes on 294 Posts

Default

Don't believe Ford will deep 6 the V8 for F150's for at least 5 years or more. Even only selling it in 25% of their 150's is a HUGE number of trucks and therefore a lot of $$$$$. They obviously have a serious problem with the new 5.0's right now but it will get fixed because it's to expensive replacing engines. That doesn't make buyers that are having their 5.0's replaced feel any better but there's not much Ford can do about it. I debated buying a 5.0 but had good results with my 2012 (3.5) and tow quite often so stayed with another 3.5. I do miss the V8 sound but also drive a vette so that suffices when I need a V8 sound fix.

I still believe the 5.0 is an excellent engine that simply needs Ford to fix the oil consumption problem and take care of people that own one!
Old 05-03-2019, 12:35 PM
  #44  
Senior Member
 
SHO4CY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: IOWA
Posts: 749
Received 195 Likes on 158 Posts

Default

I love me some V8 sound, no doubt even though I have a 3.5 EB. In fact when I was looking at new trucks before I bought mine I wanted either a 3.5 EB or 5.0, whichever I could find at the best price. That being said, there are many automakers (including Ford) that use the speakers to "enhance engine sound". How is it that no one has just straight up offered a fully customizable engine sounds option. For instance, why can't I choose to have my motor electronically sound (through speakers), like a V8, or a honda with a big chrome cannon, or a Ferrari, or a superbike, or a semi? I mean it would be easy enough to make it with many options you would think.
Old 05-03-2019, 12:48 PM
  #45  
Senior Member

 
blkZ28spt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 8,731
Received 4,778 Likes on 2,820 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SHO4CY
I love me some V8 sound, no doubt even though I have a 3.5 EB. In fact when I was looking at new trucks before I bought mine I wanted either a 3.5 EB or 5.0, whichever I could find at the best price. That being said, there are many automakers (including Ford) that use the speakers to "enhance engine sound". How is it that no one has just straight up offered a fully customizable engine sounds option. For instance, why can't I choose to have my motor electronically sound (through speakers), like a V8, or a honda with a big chrome cannon, or a Ferrari, or a superbike, or a semi? I mean it would be easy enough to make it with many options you would think.
It would never sound as good, especially with the speakers Ford tends to use, and especially with aftermarket mufflers/exhausts. Plus the whole knowing it's fake aspect, or opening a window and hearing the actual sound...pass. Little nuanced additives are one thing, this though
The following users liked this post:
SHO4CY (05-03-2019)
Old 05-03-2019, 01:04 PM
  #46  
Senior Member
 
RACarvalho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 341
Received 52 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sholxgt
Unless someone has heard differently, my understanding is that there is ZERO chance of the new pushrod motor finding it's way into an F150....
That is what we are being told but we need to think on the path of less $ and time for a solution.
The 5.0 with the 10 speed have several problems and it may well be that some problems on the engine are caused by the transmission and that may not be an easy fix.... Also, if the timing chain thing is related to harmonics (like the 3.5 was), that will take time to solve.... Time here means money for you are putting out products that will lead to expensive warranty claims not to mention the damage to the brand....
If, at the same time, the 7.3L is a successful product, it would not be difficult to imagine the temptation to detune the engine for regular F150 and have the 5.0 only for Mustangs.... If the 7.3L is being planned to get into the Raptor, that would be an even more easy transition....
I have and I like the 5.0, but I have the tick, I have the knock and I have the chain slapping noise when cold, not to mention the "pop" when decelerating and the transmission hardshift(even after the TSB) and I'm monitoring the engine oil for comsumptiom..., if you add to it all the problems I don't have, but others have, you are talking about 1000s of hours of engineering to solve all of that..... make it double if the engine is going in two different applications like Mustangs and F150s....
In my view, if the 7.3 is successful, it makes sense to focus on getting the engine (and transmission) right for the Mustang (its a great engine for that application) and drop it for the F150s.....

Last edited by RACarvalho; 05-03-2019 at 01:11 PM.
Old 05-03-2019, 01:20 PM
  #47  
Senior Member
 
RACarvalho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 341
Received 52 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ModularFord
I can’t see the 7.3 replacing the 6.2......the 6.2 is a great entry engine for super duty buyers with a lot of punch and is a proven mill. The 7.3 is available all the way down to F-250 though, so it’s not just a V-10 replacement as the V10 wasn’t in a 3/4 ton.
If you follow people that tow, quickly you will learn that Ford has a gap in their portfolio...
The 6.2 can only tow up to 16300lbs .
Today, If you have to tow 18000lbs and you want Ford, you need to go diesel - a very expensive upgrade - that will give you 35000lbs towing capacity....
The 7.3 would not only be a good replacement for the V10 but will also bring a middle ground option around 22000lbs towing capacity w/o the need for the expensive diesel.....
I tow heavy (9000lbs) with my 5.0 today and we are thinking on a 5er around 20000lbs GVWR for the future. With the options that Ford have today, I would have to upgrade to Diesel and that is too expensive for what I plan to do....
Now, If Ford have a gas truck that can tow 22000lbs, we will talk for they will have an option that GM and Ram don't have which is way less expensive...

Last edited by RACarvalho; 05-03-2019 at 01:37 PM.
Old 05-03-2019, 01:29 PM
  #48  
Senior Member
 
All Hat No Cattle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Lost Wages
Posts: 3,337
Received 1,000 Likes on 667 Posts

Default

For instance, why can't I choose to have my motor electronically sound (through speakers), like a V8, or a honda with a big chrome cannon, or a Ferrari, or a superbike, or a semi?
That has been available for years, just Google it.

For instance, check out this scooter, LOL.

The following 2 users liked this post by All Hat No Cattle:
MR G (05-04-2019), SHO4CY (05-03-2019)
Old 05-03-2019, 01:30 PM
  #49  
Senior Member

 
Flamingtaco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 9,078
Received 3,165 Likes on 2,194 Posts
Default

I think the previous 'stang looks like it has a silly smile going on, and appreciate the new design that eliminated that. Stang owners are indeed a fickle bunch, though, (and a bit too cocky), and gave me plenty of reason to switch from racing stangs to SHOs.
Old 05-03-2019, 01:35 PM
  #50  
Super Duper Senior Member

 
tuflehundon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,804
Received 346 Likes on 281 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sholxgt
Sadly the Coyotes are now the ones getting replaced at an alarming rate (similar to the early EB's) and they aren't much cheaper.

Just for the heck of it, I pulled up the turbos on a '13 F150 3.5. They are $550 each from Tasca parts. Not exactly a HUGE sum of money these days. Not sure about the price difference between the two long blocks. In theory, the v6 long block should be cheaper.
Turbos may cost $550, but not everyone has the time or mechanical ability to replace them. No way in hell I could have replaced my engine. I can do a lot to my truck, but know when to call a real mechanic. I wouldn't touch the turbos either.


Quick Reply: Is The End In Sight? Ford Plans To Scale Back 5.0L V8 Production At Essex Engine Plan



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:12 PM.