Topic Sponsor
2015 - 2020 Ford F150 General discussion on the 13th generation Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Worksport

EcoDrive mode

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 7, 2018 | 12:39 PM
  #11  
Havyek's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 356
Likes: 71
From: Central Ontario, Canada
Default

No experience on the F150 as my 2016 doesn't have it, but I played with it a lot on my 11 Sonata, and as has been said if you want it to work, you need to change your driving style.

I also got worse mileage due to pressing the throttle down more to get the car up and moving at anything that felt like an acceptable speed. Didn't seem to affect anything during cruising speeds more stop/go driving.

Last edited by Havyek; Feb 7, 2018 at 12:44 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2018 | 08:56 PM
  #12  
Air-cooled's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 65
Likes: 3
Default

I don't expect the same performance as Normal mode, in fact I kinda like that it slows me down a bit on accelerations. But I still get worse mileage in EcoDrive.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2019 | 11:24 PM
  #13  
ranken's Avatar
5 Year Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 701
Likes: 75
From: Kansas
Default

When I used the Eco mode my pickup kept throwing a CEL.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2019 | 12:03 AM
  #14  
5Lgreenback's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 53
Likes: 5
Default

One thing I recently noticed with my truck is that accelerating TOO slowly hurts my mpg. But I also noticed that my mpg improved with a 550lb snowmobile in the bed.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2019 | 06:45 PM
  #15  
Jrthompson's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 86
Likes: 47
From: Houston
Default

that’s funny you mention that about the weight in the bed. I sold my 2013 ecoboost 4x4 and it did so much better towing than it did in every day driving for some reason. Was the oddest thing to tow a boat and get better gas mileage and driving around normally LOL. But I’m definitely not missing the 12 mpg of my old truck compared to my new 2018.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2019 | 09:46 AM
  #16  
Thugzy's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 1,047
Likes: 495
Default

In my 2018 I get better mileage when using Eco mode and even more better using wet/snow.... a 2mpg decline when using Normal mode.

To be frugal, it's all about driving habits, especially with a turbo engine, learning to drive with minimal boost possible is key, the 10speed algorithm helps too.... if you drive in Eco and are into boost more than half the time, you will not see any fuel consumption difference between Eco and Normal

I have an external Boost gauge that helps me monitor the levels. At anytime when I see slight boost, I adjust my foot accordingly and sometimes manually change gears to avoid lugging

Last edited by Thugzy; Feb 9, 2019 at 09:49 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2019 | 10:05 PM
  #17  
artsr2002's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 14,630
Likes: 8,821
From: My House
Default

I put it Sport from time to time for ****s and giggles. Its fun. I leave it in normal most of the time though. I have noticed I get better MPGs per the lie-o-meter when I put premium in it.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2019 | 10:23 PM
  #18  
cgarison's Avatar
Utility Guy
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 232
Likes: 42
From: Pennsylvania
Default

I definitely get better MPGs with a light foot in Normal mode than trying to drive in Eco mode around town.

And yes, 93 Octane gets me at least 2 MPG more per gallon (never more than 3 MPG), but that extra MPG does not make up for the 60 to 90 cent premium that I pay at the pump, so I stick with 87 octane.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2019 | 04:55 AM
  #19  
dykzeulb's Avatar
PLATINUM
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,087
Likes: 246
From: Kansas City
Default

Originally Posted by cgarison
I definitely get better MPGs with a light foot in Normal mode than trying to drive in Eco mode around town.

And yes, 93 Octane gets me at least 2 MPG more per gallon (never more than 3 MPG), but that extra MPG does not make up for the 60 to 90 cent premium that I pay at the pump, so I stick with 87 octane.
Isn't premium recommended on all engine configurations now per the manual?
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2019 | 05:53 AM
  #20  
D_D_in_KY's Avatar
5 Year Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 495
Likes: 118
From: Central Kentucky
Default

I had two 2.7 liter SCAB trucks and loved the MPG. Now in a 3.5 liter SCREW but we are still in the break-in period (less than 5000 miles). I used the ECO mode a fair amount in the 2015 ( 6 spd) and really can not say the fuel economy was better. Thanks for starting the thread. Will be interested in seeing future posts.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:31 AM.