Topic Sponsor
2015 - 2020 Ford F150 General discussion on the 13th generation Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Worksport

Does Octane Affect Performance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 14, 2015 | 04:26 PM
  #21  
Janpijpelink's Avatar
Retired Petroleum Chemist
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 233
Likes: 124
From: NJ
Default

As a petroleum chemist I can tell you how it works.
When a car manufacturer designs a new engine, the car company works very closely with a Technology Center (TC) of an oil company. There are 4 TC's in the US: Shell (Houston, TX), Chevron (Richmond, CA), ExxonMobil (Annandale, NJ and Paulsboro, NJ). I visit these TC's frequently and I worked at the Gulf Oil TC.

These Technology Centers have engine labs and dozens of car engines are bench top installed and are running for thousands of hours to test the engines on the following parameters, among many others:
- Fuels and fuel mixes
- Lubricants
- Wear and tear
- Durability
- Exhaust gases
- Fuel economy

All these test results are sent back to the car manufacturer before the new engine is put in the market. So, what is in the car manual that comes with the vehicle is based on extensive research and testing to get to the optimum performance of the car engine.

Besides the engine lab, vehicles are donated to the TC's for long term field testing, meaning that TC employees drive these cars for many, many miles for durability testing to give the car manufacturer data to make any changes to the engine for next generation vehicles with that specific engine.

What I am trying to say is that the recommended fuel type in the manual is there for a reason: optimum performance on all parameters listed and not only fuel economy or HP's.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2015 | 04:43 PM
  #22  
130428's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,923
Likes: 711
From: Calgary, AB
Default

^ wait, what? you mean Ford engineers actually know better than all the self-made experts around here? you gotta be kiddin', right?



never tried premium, don't plan to unless I start towing "heavy"! (did just fine with a ~ 3,000 lb U-haul on regular)
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2015 | 05:18 PM
  #23  
jjkjr's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 405
Likes: 17
Default

had to take a 1200 round trip avg speed 70-85 got avg 19 mpg with my 5.0 with 87 octane...... ran great no problems..... and i see no need to change, of course i wasnt towing nor do much towing at all
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2015 | 08:22 AM
  #24  
theplat's Avatar
Powered By Dead Dinos
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 63
Likes: 18
From: Kitchener Canada
Default

Originally Posted by TNathe
You can most certainly run higher boost pressures with higher octane gas. What do you mean by the compression ratio isnt high enough? Forced induction absolutley increases cylinder pressures yes? I would never run low ictane in a boosted motor. Nothing like running 18psi and getting detonation. Does a lot of good for you motor :roll:

forced induction DOES increase cylinder pressures that's true, and fairly obvious, ... but we're not talking about bolting turbo's onto old honda engines. in a DIRECT INJECTION engine the fuel is added in a measured quantity at almost the top of the compression stroke, and is therefor HARDLY COMPRESSED AT ALL.

since octane is a measure of how much compression (and by extension heat from friction) is required to ignite the fuel, there is no possible performance gain to be seen in an ecoboost from premium gas. period. full stop.


Please read the other thread.
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2015 | 07:43 AM
  #25  
Fasttimez's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 257
From: Virginia
Default

Here's an acronym for you guys to GOOGLE....LSPI or Low Speed Pre Ignition......it's a very common problem in Forced Induction DI engines. The engineers can't figure out what causes it, some say it's the oil, some say it's the fuel....who knows, but I for one will continue to run 93 octane in my Ecoboost for maximum (pre ignition) resistance. It's a very violent & sudden event that literally blows pistons apart. It's a problem across every manufacturer that has forced induction DI engines.
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2015 | 08:21 AM
  #26  
tsigwing's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 2,166
Likes: 637
From: Garland, Tx
Default

Originally Posted by Fasttimez
Here's an acronym for you guys to GOOGLE....LSPI or Low Speed Pre Ignition......it's a very common problem in Forced Induction DI engines. The engineers can't figure out what causes it, some say it's the oil, some say it's the fuel....who knows, but I for one will continue to run 93 octane in my Ecoboost for maximum (pre ignition) resistance. It's a very violent & sudden event that literally blows pistons apart. It's a problem across every manufacturer that has forced induction DI engines.


Ford has over 500,000 3.5L ecoboost motors in the F150. If this was a problem, we would know about it.
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2015 | 09:10 AM
  #27  
Fasttimez's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 257
From: Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by tsigwing
Ford has over 500,000 3.5L ecoboost motors in the F150. If this was a problem, we would know about it.
I suggest you reasearch before you make comments about stuff you know nothing about. I've personally seen pistons hanging out of blocks because of this (Ford & GM). It seems to be worse on 4 cylinder engines vs V6 engines though. Then there's that little timing chain stretch issue that Ford claimed wasn't a problem & "that noise is normal" until you're out of warranty & have to fix it.....but they never stated they had a problem there either.

Last edited by Fasttimez; Sep 24, 2015 at 09:12 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2015 | 09:28 AM
  #28  
gmissed's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 184
Likes: 16
From: Pickering, Ontario
Default

From the Manual, page 169....

2.7L and 3.5L EcoBoost Engines

To provide improved performance, we
recommend premium fuel for severe duty
usage
, such as trailer tow.

3.5L V6 and 5.0L V8 Engines
We recommend regular unleaded gasoline
with a pump (R+M)/2 octane rating of 87.
Some stations offer fuels posted as regular
with an octane rating below 87, particularly
in high altitude areas. We do not
recommend fuels with an octane rating
below 87.
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2015 | 10:31 AM
  #29  
DallasTXF150's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 750
Likes: 209
Default Does Octane Affect Performance

Originally Posted by Fasttimez
Here's an acronym for you guys to GOOGLE....LSPI or Low Speed Pre Ignition......it's a very common problem in Forced Induction DI engines. The engineers can't figure out what causes it, some say it's the oil, some say it's the fuel....who knows, but I for one will continue to run 93 octane in my Ecoboost for maximum (pre ignition) resistance. It's a very violent & sudden event that literally blows pistons apart. It's a problem across every manufacturer that has forced induction DI engines.
Those that play Russian Roulette once can vouch that they played and survived. Now ask them to play six in a row (constant towing, back to back to back to back WOT applications or aftermarket tunes for max performance gains). They want the insurance of premium.
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2015 | 11:44 AM
  #30  
Fasttimez's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 257
From: Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by gmissed
From the Manual, page 169....

2.7L and 3.5L EcoBoost Engines

To provide improved performance, we
recommend premium fuel for severe duty
usage, such as trailer tow.

3.5L V6 and 5.0L V8 Engines
We recommend regular unleaded gasoline
with a pump (R+M)/2 octane rating of 87.
Some stations offer fuels posted as regular
with an octane rating below 87, particularly
in high altitude areas. We do not
recommend fuels with an octane rating
below 87.
People don't even read their manuals anymore, I read this also.....our knock sensors CAN & WILL adjust for different octane fuels, you WILL make more power in an EcoBoost with premium fuel, I doubt you will see any MPG change though. The 4 cylinder EcoBoost even states YOU WILL lose power using 87 octane BUT you can safely run it.

Originally Posted by DallasTXF150
Those that play Russian Roulette once can vouch that they played and survived. Now ask them to play six in a row (constant towing, back to back to back to back WOT applications or aftermarket tunes for max performance gains). They want the insurance of premium.
Exactly, at just about $5-$7 more per fill up, I'll take 93 everytime.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:21 PM.