Topic Sponsor
1987 - 1996 F150 Still running strong! Talk about your 8th and 9th generation Ford F150 trucks.

thermostat lower-temperature-rating consequences to EGR, PCM functioning

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-18-2012, 07:45 AM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
rfhaney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Joshua Tree, CA
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default thermostat lower-temperature-rating consequences to EGR, PCM functioning

I have a 1988 F150 with 5.0L engine. It has electronic fuel injection and EEC-IV electronic engine controls.

I have a couple of questions. One regards fan-clutch and water-pump wear, and the other regards EGR functioning and the check-engine light, and these questions seem like they could be interrelated because I have been using a thermostat with a lower-than-OE opening-temperature rating when the engine's computer may be assuming I have a thermostat installed with the original-equipment (OE) temperature rating. The OE temperature rating is apparently 192 deg F or 195 deg F, depending on what parts store I ask, and I am using a 180 deg F thermostat.

I am posting the questions separately in the interest of keeping each question as brief as possible.

The first question regarded fan-clutch and water-pump wear and was posted here.

Second question: Does a thermostat with a lower than OE opening-temperature rating cause the on-board engine-control computer to miscalculate the proper amount of EGR?

I was once advised by a auto-parts store employee that I should probably use a thermostat with lower-than-OE rating under the theory that an older engine will run better with less trouble if it has a thermostat with a cooler opening-temperature rating than the original equipment. A 180 deg F thermostat was suggested.

At first I was reluctant to change to a cooler thermostat. But I eventually decided the auto-parts guy was more likely right than not. (By the way, I would appreciate any comments to clarify whether the auto-parts guy was indeed right.)

So about 2.5 years ago I installed a 180 deg F rated thermostat.

As a result the temperature gauge climbs up only half way to the bottom end of the “normal” range.

(By the way, I had also replaced the regular radiator with a heavy-duty radiator a little over 3.5 years ago.)

During at least the last few months my check-engine light has been flickering occasionally in a somewhat erratic manner but then would usually go off for extended periods of time. Since my battery charging light would also occasionally flicker in the same manner, and since an independent test of the battery and alternator would confirm they are functioning properly, I figured the flickering lamps were perhaps due to something like an aging resistor in the electronic display circuits.

However, I had a smog test done recently on the truck. Part of the preparation for the test involved running the engine at a rather high rpm for an extended period of time. (I suppose the intent was to burn out any carbon that may have accumulated in the combustion chambers.)

But one thing that has been very noticeable since the smog test is that the check-engine light doesn't just occasionally flicker. It now flashes on and off, on frequent occasions, especially when I am accelerating. Usually the light will go off when let up on the gas peddle and accelerate more slowly.

So I finally decided to read the engine's diagnostic trouble codes. Here are the results:

Key-on, engine-off (KOEO):

code 32 = EVP voltage below closed limit
code 67 = Neutral Drive Switch (NDS) circuit open (= Neutral/drive switch open or A/C on, per Chilton manual)

“Continuous”:

code 32 = EVP voltage below closed limit
code 29 = Insufficient input from vehicle speed sensor

I don't know what to make of the codes 67 and 29, but I figure that the code 32 is probably what is causing the check-engine light to flash.

Anyway, it occurs to me that, because of the 180 deg F thermostat, the engine-control computer may be assuming that the coolant temperature is too low and therefore may be trying to make the engine to run hotter, and, as a result, may be closing down the EGR in order to accomplish that purpose.

So I wonder if the engine is working against itself and causing temperatures to be more extreme than normal: The coolant is cooler than normal, but maybe, as a result, the combustion chambers are also hotter than normal.

I noticed that my driver's-side exhaust manifold is cracked around its circumference at the back end of the manifold, and I wonder if this could be caused by the supposedly higher extremes in temperature, especially the supposedly hotter exhaust gases due to the supposed shutting down of the EGR because of the cooler coolant.

I recently bought a vacuum hand-pump/gauge and I already have a digital volt/ohm meter, but before I go about doing the testing recommended by the Haynes manual and potentially damaging connectors and/or brittle vacuum lines, I wonder whether I should first replace the 180 deg F thermostat with a OE-rated thermostat.

Any insights would be welcome.

In particular, is my conjecture about the computer's EGR response to the cooler-than-normal coolant correct?

And should I first replace the thermostat with an OE-rated thermostat before risking diagnostic-testing damage to connectors and brittle vacuum lines?

I wonder if the “Insufficient input from vehicle speed sensor” (= trouble code 29) is also complicating the matter. I can find nothing in the Haynes manual about a “vehicle speed sensor”. What should I do about this trouble code?

I wonder if the “Neutral Drive Switch (NDS) circuit open” (= “Neutral/drive switch open or A/C on”) trouble code 67 could be due to the fact that the “P-R-N-O/D-D-1 pointer assembly with the tiny pointer-control cable has crumbled. (I do my gear-shift-lever shifting entirely by “feel” of the gear-shift lever with no visual feedback.) I keep the A/C switch off; the A/C system does not hold a refrigerant charge anyway.

Is there anything I should do about this trouble code 67?

This web page ( http://www.oldfuelinjection.com/index.php?p=47 ) says the code 67 means “Neutral safety circuit failure”. The word “safety” reminds me that I can sometimes start the engine in gear-shift positions other than “Park”. And a previous owner has also installed a starter push-button switch that connects directly to the starter relay under the hood because the OE ignition switch is sometimes hard to twist to the start the engine.

And if I install an OE thermostat and clear the trouble codes and if the “EVP voltage below closed limit” code 32 does not return (and no new trouble codes appear), do I still need to do electrical and vacuum diagnostic testing on the EGR system?

It may also be worth noting that the computer-controls description at
http://www.oldfuelinjection.com/
seems to say that the computer anticipates that sensor characteristics may vary (from one installed sensor to any alternative installed sensor) by as much as 15% and that the computer will calibrate such a sensor when it operates in system-learning mode, which occurs typically after the battery has been disconnected and reconnected.

This suggests that the computer may assume that the installed thermostat is an OE thermostat and that when the Engine Coolant Temperature Sensor (ECT) indicates to the computer that the engine temperature has leveled off, the computer may assume that the temperature is 192 deg F or 195 deg F rather than the actual temperature of about 180 deg F.

So, in summary, it seems that the computer may be working under the assumption that the warmed-up engine coolant temperature is 192 deg or 195 deg rather than the actual temperature of about 180 deg.

First of all, is this the way the computer works?

And second, what affect does this have on the general performance of the engine – for example, wear, gas consumption, trouble codes, etc.?

Last edited by rfhaney; 01-18-2012 at 10:00 AM. Reason: to activate e-mail notification
Old 01-18-2012, 01:57 PM
  #2  
Hi-Rev Motorsports
 
dr_bowtie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Northern Indiana
Posts: 4,898
Likes: 0
Received 63 Likes on 62 Posts

Default

if you have a Cali-emission ECU you can safely run a 180 t-stat and it will still enter loop mode... this will not cause a light to pop nor will it cause other code...

you DO want to check the voltage of the 2-wire temp sensor on the intake at COLD and HOT levels to make sure it is within the range (Google) you can check the voltage (key on) before you start it in the morning and then after its fully warm.

If you have a Mid-western/Eastern calibrated ECU you can safely run a 160 degree T-Stat....and it will still enter loop mode..

these have no adverse affects on the EGR system or any other as they are totally separate...
Old 01-19-2012, 07:05 AM
  #3  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
rfhaney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Joshua Tree, CA
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Thanks, dr_bowtie, for the comments. Yes, I have Calif-emissions ECU.

I did diagnostic testing of the EGR valve per Haynes manual.

EGR valve holds vacuum extremely well.

And it also ostensibly passed the functional test. In particular, I had to use several pieces of wood to simulate a helper's foot on the gas pedal for fast idle by bracing the gas pedal against the steering wheel to keep engine running while the Idle Air Control solenoid was disconnected and vacuum was applied to the EGR valve. The result: When vacuum was applied to EGR valve, engine slows down if cold, but if hot, gets erratically very uneven rpm.

With vacuum gauge attached to the EGR valve's vacuum hose, as the engine rpm was increased to a very fast idle, eventually (with increasing rpm) the vacuum gauge needle shows vacuum of sorts, but the needle jumps around erratically and very rapidly between zero and about 3 inch Hg.

This erratic behavior of of the needle was not mentioned by the Haynes manual; so I wonder: Does this erratic behavior indicate some sort of problem?

When I attempted to do the Engine Running Self-Test to check operation of the EVR solenoid, the self-test would not activate: Aside from a momentary flash of the the "check-engine" light as I turned the OE ignition switch from start position to run position, the "check-engine" light did not flash to indicate self-test operation. For actual starter operation I had to use a separately installed ad-hoc starter button that is connected directly to the under-hood starter relay; the OE start switch does not always turn the starter; sometimes it does; sometimes it doesn't; today it did not; I had to use the ad-hoc starter button. But I also turned the OE ignition switch to the start position simultaneously in case the engine computer was expecting that in order to start the self-test. Result: no flashing of the "check-engine" light to indicate self-test operation. When I turned the engine off and then turned the ignition switch back on, the KOEO self-test began and showed that there was indeed continuity in the self-test jumper hook-up.

So the Engine Running Self-Test would not start; it was needed to test proper activation of the EVR from the computer's control as would be indicated by a momentary vacuum of at least 1 inch Hg at the EGR valve's vacuum hose during the Engine Running Self-Test.

So I wonder whether the non-operation of the Engine Running Self-Test is due to the bum OE start switch (which is bypassed by the ad-hoc start switch). Or perhaps, is it due to a bum Neutral Drive Switch (NDS), as suggested by the code 67??
Old 01-19-2012, 07:11 AM
  #4  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
rfhaney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Joshua Tree, CA
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

inadvertent duplicate post deleted

Last edited by rfhaney; 01-19-2012 at 08:54 PM. Reason: Deleting due to inadvertent duplicate post
Old 01-19-2012, 08:22 AM
  #5  
Paramedic
 
RocketMedic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Yukon, OK
Posts: 170
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

If it normally keystarts only with clutch in, neutral works. Adhoc button may be causing your code. Very interested, since my 91 4.9 only warms up in heavy traffic.
Old 01-19-2012, 08:34 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
bubbabud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Tonopah. AZ.
Posts: 3,380
Received 502 Likes on 324 Posts

Default

It eems to me that just putting in the correct Tstat and give it a try might be a quick cheap test.just a thaught
Old 01-19-2012, 10:01 AM
  #7  
Senior Member

 
ymeski56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Long Beach Calimexifornia
Posts: 58,557
Received 1,162 Likes on 647 Posts

Default

Sounds like EVP sensor is defective as well as your VSS sensor. I recommend sticking w/ Motorcraft on those.

See Link: http://oldfuelinjection.com/?p=35

I run a 180F thermostat in my 87' 302 w/ no problem.

Last edited by ymeski56; 01-19-2012 at 10:05 AM.
Old 01-20-2012, 05:02 PM
  #8  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
rfhaney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Joshua Tree, CA
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I'm getting conflicting info on location for the vehicle speed sensor (VSS).

AutoZone shows two different Vehicle Speed Sensors for my vehicle: This one (Click here) on or at the speedometer cable; and this one (click here) is on the transmission.

Rock Auto shows at least three different speed sensors when I enter "vehicle speed sensor" in the search box after I've selected my vehicle info ID. Two of them are shown under "1988 FORD F-150 5.0L 302cid V8 : Electrical : Speed Sensor".

One entry says, "Mounted on Transmission". Another says, "Differential Speed Sensor Rear".

And another section (keyed to my vehicle ID) shows "ABS speed sensor" associated with the rear brakes.

And this web page ( http://www.oldfuelinjection.com/?p=33 ) says the VSS is inside or on the transmission.

( http://www.oldfuelinjection.com/ seems to be focused primarily on Fords over any other make or model.)

So how do I make sense of this conflicting info?
Old 01-20-2012, 05:45 PM
  #9  
Senior Member

 
ymeski56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Long Beach Calimexifornia
Posts: 58,557
Received 1,162 Likes on 647 Posts

Default

It should be mounted on top of the differential on an 88'.

Last edited by ymeski56; 01-20-2012 at 05:48 PM.
Old 01-20-2012, 07:23 PM
  #10  
We'd do it

iTrader: (1)
 
Just call me Sean's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Orlando,Fl.
Posts: 35,602
Received 449 Likes on 402 Posts

Default

Yes, you have two VSS'.


Quick Reply: thermostat lower-temperature-rating consequences to EGR, PCM functioning



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:48 PM.