Topic Sponsor
2011+ Engine Related Questions Sub-Forum to the new engines that debuted in 2011.

Regular vs. premium gas for Ecoboost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-27-2013, 03:59 PM
  #91  
Senior Member
 
OddBall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Northern Va.
Posts: 341
Received 60 Likes on 50 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Rick boomer
The Duratec 3.5L has a 10.3:1 compression ration which puts it solidly in the 91 and above octane regime. To run on regular it must be detuned.

Gasoline motors with basic underlying designs that run on regular fuel see no improved performance on premium, no increased power or torque.

Start with a false premiss and you can get a false conclusion.

Yes, in the "old days" many engines designed for regular might have benefitted with premium but that was because premium fuels had better detergency than regular fuels in those old days. It had nothing to do with octane. Now, regular fuels must have equal detergency.

http://www.daytona-sensors.com/tech_tuning.html
Baloney.

Explain this one: My 08 Accord has a CR of 10.5:1 yet 87 RON -is- the recommended fuel. That puts it squarely in the...whoops, it's not squarely in anything.

You're partially incorrect about the old engines running better on higher octane because of detergent levels. I managed a Texaco station back in the early 90's and regular/premium had the same level of detergents in them. You're throwing out 'old days' with nothing to back it up other than your personal belief system. Engines that had many miles on them benefited from higher octane because of it's resistance to knock.

Explain this: Where are the people who complain their EB does not run right on 87 RON? Please be specific, cite credible and verifiable references and avoid the anecdotal 'well some have complained' response.

As Al Kaholic posted the pic, it fits. Not this crap again.

Try again.

Last edited by OddBall; 10-27-2013 at 04:03 PM.
The following users liked this post:
isthatahemi (02-10-2016)
Old 10-27-2013, 05:29 PM
  #92  
Senior Member
 
packplantpath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,964
Received 584 Likes on 404 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Rick boomer

No one ever said that the engine didn't have the adaptive ability to run on any gasoline fuel from 87-93. That said, the simple fact that many people have had trouble running on 87 says that the adaptive technology does not work for all ecoBoost motors under all conditions, these adaptions are many and complex, all these adaptions reduce power and torque.

The statement was that the basic underlying design was that of a premium fuel engine and it is. That the basic underlying design would require premium fuel and it does. That maximum performance would be using premium fuel, and Ford agrees. All true.

Conclusion, it is understandable that some people have trouble with regular fuel. It is understandable that maximum performance is with premium fuel. It is understandable that adaptive technology is required to run with regular fuel. It is understandable that the adaptivre technology does not always work on all ecoBoost motors under all circumstances for all people. No two of these motors are exactly the same. They are mass produced and have variable behavior. Not all will function optimally. Almost all will function to their individual optimums on premium fuel (according to Ford).

That does in no way mean what you argue against, that premium fuel is required or even suggested. No one is ever required to run premium fuel. If you are running on regular and having trouble a fix might be available by upping the octane and it is easy to understand why that fix would work. If you are in need of optimum performance do to rigirous load or towing requirements, you might do better with premium fuel and that would be understandable. If you are not having problems and do not need optimum performance you will probably operate more economically with regular fuel. If you want to drag race, you might do better with premium fuel, and would be easy to understand.

If you have trouble understanding breaking down the understanding of different componets and functions of modern motors into their underlying basic components and the physics, chemistry, and engineering of those components what can I say. If you can only understand the net overall integrated behavior then you will not be able to understand how the system functions, fails to function, or it's optimum performance conditions.
Find some posts from these"many people" claiming issues running 87 octane. Never seen that one. Never. Not once have I seen a post reporting that.
Old 10-27-2013, 05:44 PM
  #93  
Senior Member
 
MadocHandyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Madoc, Ontario
Posts: 5,800
Received 277 Likes on 193 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by packplantpath
Find some posts from these"many people" claiming issues running 87 octane. Never seen that one. Never. Not once have I seen a post reporting that.
If I remember correctly, he even claimed there were lawsuits against Ford regarding this supposed octane issue.
Old 10-27-2013, 05:51 PM
  #94  
Senior Member
 
packplantpath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,964
Received 584 Likes on 404 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MadocHandyman

If I remember correctly, he even claimed there were lawsuits against Ford regarding this supposed octane issue.
I won't say they don't exist. But I've been around a while and that one has never come up in the "I almost got killed passing a semi"threads.

I'd like some links!
Old 10-27-2013, 06:59 PM
  #95  
Senior Member
 
scap99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Houston
Posts: 392
Received 80 Likes on 66 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by packplantpath

I won't say they don't exist. But I've been around a while and that one has never come up in the "I almost got killed passing a semi"threads.

I'd like some links!
I almost got killed passing a semi, yesterday.
Only because the tundra I got in front of almost plowed me when I had to slam on my brakes to keep the guy that was in front of me from sideswiping my truck because he thought he could pass without looking over his shoulder...
Old 10-28-2013, 12:47 AM
  #96  
Inebriated 4 ur safety
 
Al Kohalic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,524
Received 894 Likes on 483 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by scap99
I almost got killed passing a semi, yesterday.
Only because the tundra I got in front of almost plowed me when I had to slam on my brakes to keep the guy that was in front of me from sideswiping my truck because he thought he could pass without looking over his shoulder...

Ouch! Glad that nothing happened to you on that one.
The following users liked this post:
scap99 (10-28-2013)
Old 10-28-2013, 10:02 AM
  #97  
Senior Member
 
scap99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Houston
Posts: 392
Received 80 Likes on 66 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Al Kohalic

Ouch! Glad that nothing happened to you on that one.
I'm running premium fuel. It's liquid invincibility. :-)
The following users liked this post:
rdkev (10-28-2013)
Old 02-02-2016, 05:48 PM
  #98  
Junior Member
 
benson_chris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TwinTurboFx4
I put regular in mine but about 5 hours ago on my way to michigan from kansas city I applied some throttle to pass a semi all of a sudden my truck started to shutter and check engine light was flashing so I pulled off to the side of the road, shut my truck off, and restarted it. Ran fine the rest of the way 280 miles. So I'm thinking it was a miss fire so when I got to michigan I put 93 in to see if it will make a difference. Other than that im taking it to the dealer Monday.
Spark plugs. My truck did this. Check plugs. Gapped double what they should be. Bought new plugs, gapped properly-no problems since
Old 02-03-2016, 11:19 AM
  #99  
Senior Member
 
superccs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 967
Received 25 Likes on 23 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by benson_chris
Spark plugs. My truck did this. Check plugs. Gapped double what they should be. Bought new plugs, gapped properly-no problems since
Yeah but plug gaps shouldn't be a culprit for a one-off type event, right? Doesn't hurt to check, they have been reported by many to be way off at times.

Perhaps you got some condensation chugged in to your intake from humidity/temp/vacuum Bermuda triangle situation caused by your stomping on it.

Glad it came back online after a restart and didn't goof your trip up.

I just recently ran a tank of 91 through mine and am loving the freshness of the power available compared to the 87 tune. Considering staying with 91 unless some arguments are made in the contrary.
Old 02-03-2016, 12:20 PM
  #100  
Senior Member
 
130428's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 2,923
Received 708 Likes on 486 Posts
Default

funny, when I opened this thread I thought that was the one going on last week... same title, 3 pages long (for me anyway), and then I see that no, a 1-post wonderboy revived this 3-yr old thread

some things never change around here...


Quick Reply: Regular vs. premium gas for Ecoboost



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:13 PM.