Topic Sponsor
2015 - 2020 Ford F150 General discussion on the 13th generation Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Please explain rear axle ratio

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-19-2014, 01:58 PM
  #41  
Member
 
papa tiger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 32,108
Received 239 Likes on 223 Posts

Default

The 3.73 would give you near the max the truck can do; less better overall fuel economy. 1/10ths miles per gallon lower.

Last edited by papa tiger; 10-19-2014 at 02:00 PM.
Old 10-21-2014, 05:42 PM
  #42  
Better OUT then IN
 
justjimmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: South Florida (Ft. Lauderdale area)
Posts: 3,343
Received 253 Likes on 206 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by dkj313
What benifit would it be adding ontop of the fx4 5.0 other than power off the line spending another $540 for the 3.73

Don't tow. Want regular can shorted.
Exactly... "If you don't tow" ...any substantial weight.
Old 10-23-2014, 11:16 AM
  #43  
Senior Member
 
Ron AKA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 310
Received 20 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by papa tiger
The 3.73 would give you near the max the truck can do; less better overall fuel economy. 1/10ths miles per gallon lower.

Unless you go with the 3.5 EcoBoost engine. Then the 3.73 reduces maximum towing capacity compared to the 3.55.


Old 10-23-2014, 12:09 PM
  #44  
Member
 
papa tiger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 32,108
Received 239 Likes on 223 Posts

Default

I believe with the 3.73 axle you get the heavy duty package including the 51 tube radiator. All else get the 41 tube radiator. Not sure for 15 though it mentions heavy duty package with the 3.73 and not other axle ratios. Also the diameter of the rim is larger. Many want larger rims/tires on theirs. 3.73 an your ready for them.

Last edited by papa tiger; 10-23-2014 at 12:11 PM.
Old 09-09-2015, 07:48 AM
  #45  
Senior Member
 
Stans2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Virginia
Posts: 490
Received 97 Likes on 70 Posts

Default Are there any additional advantages to getting 4WD.

Originally Posted by 1969TxCowboy
I'm not very truck savvy when it comes to rear axle ratio. Why is it important? I think it has something to do with towing, but is that all it's used for? Why is it important for towing? What exactly is this the ratio of?

I was building a Lariat on the build site and these were my options:

3.15 electronic locking axle ratio

3.15 non-limited slip axle ratio

3.55 electronic locking axle ratio


Why would I choose one ratio over the other? What difference does it make?

I chose max tow package and saw that it had the 3.55 locking axle ratio. If I sometimes pull a boat, do I need the max tow package? If not, which ratio is best for occasionally pulling a boat?

What ratio is best just for everyday driving going down the highway?

What are the advantages and disadvantages of each ratio?

And what is limited slip vs. locking? Why and when would one be better than the other?

Thank you for the explanations.

1969TxCowboy


I am building a Lariat SuperCrew 157" WB with Max Towing and 3.55 electronic locking axle ratio. Are there any additional advantages to getting 4WD? I don't do any offroading, but I do heavy towing and I also live in a state that gets some snow/ice. The $3,000 additional pricetag, reduced gas mileage, and reduced towing capacity (200 lbs) for 4WD makes it worth the research. I currently have a Toyota Tundra Crewmax w/ 2WD and I only get a little slipping during icy conditions.

Last edited by Stans2000; 09-09-2015 at 08:08 AM.
Old 09-10-2015, 11:45 PM
  #46  
Senior Member
 
KYBuckeye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 1,344
Received 312 Likes on 227 Posts
Default

Well a 4WD truck will be infinitely easier to resell and command a higher price too. Maybe not dollar for dollar wat you paid up front for it but te demand will be much greater for the 4wd. Obviously you're not buying it for what the next guy might want in a truck, but I did. I got max tow with 3.55 e locker and 4wd and I don't "need" any of it.
Old 09-12-2015, 09:02 AM
  #47  
Senior Member
 
Velosprout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: East Central Illinois
Posts: 1,005
Received 208 Likes on 168 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by justjimmy
I couldn't agree more but I don't believe the 2015 EcoBoost is available with a 3.73. Too bad because, everything you said is spot on.
The 3.5 Ecoboost 2015 was available for order with a 3.73; that is what I ordered. It was available as a part of the Heavy Duty Payload Package. Unfortunately, my 2015 truck order was cancelled by Ford, and I have re-ordered a '16 with the same specs.


It appears that for 2016 according to the order guide, 3.73 w/3.5 EcoBoost remains available only with the HD Payload package, which limits available trim levels and options.
Old 09-12-2015, 09:13 AM
  #48  
Better OUT then IN
 
justjimmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: South Florida (Ft. Lauderdale area)
Posts: 3,343
Received 253 Likes on 206 Posts

Default

Cool. Thanks for clarifying.
Old 10-13-2015, 06:00 PM
  #49  
Junior Member
 
jrgillespie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Great thread and timely for me. I'm shopping around for a 2015 4x4 w/3.5 Eco Boost and Max towing. Selecting the best axle ratio is a consideration for me as well. Was at the local Ford dealer today talking to a salesman asking him questions about towing capacity, and he was throwing out some "rough" numbers, but couldn't be specific about axle ratios & power-plants. I asked him if he had a towing spec sheet for all the different configurations and he did. He copied it for me; see attached pdf.
Attached Files
Old 10-14-2015, 02:05 AM
  #50  
Senior Member
 
cloudhax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 148
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

so I'm looking at ordering a 5.0 lariat s crew and I don't plan to do much/any towing, nor do I want to lift it and put big tires on it.

But, I do want to maximize for street performance. I had an SVT Lightning for many years and miss it, I'm hoping to put a blower on a 5.0 2016 f150 since it doesn't look like they are going to bring the lightning back any time soon

would 3.73s be just silly for such a truck? stick with 3.55? someone mentioned 1/10th a mile per gallon difference, is that accurate? if so it doesn't seem like much so maybe 3.73 is better for for low-end power?



Quick Reply: Please explain rear axle ratio



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:43 PM.