Topic Sponsor
Towing/ Hauling/ Plowing Discuss all of your towing and/or cargo moving experiences here.

2021 HDPP Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 25, 2021 | 01:24 PM
  #1  
Gene K's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,880
Likes: 707
Default 2021 HDPP Question

I noticed something in looking in the specifications for the 2021 HDPP.

Cargo Ratings

Reg Cab 4x2 = 76 lb higher cargo rating for 5.0 vs 3.5.

SuperCrew 4x4 = 10 lb higher cargo rating for 5.0 vs 3.5.

Does Ford delete the 36 gallon fuel tank on the Reg Cab 4x2 5.0 to bump up advertised maximum payload? 66 lb is about what the 36 gallon tank adds.


Last edited by Gene K; Mar 25, 2021 at 01:33 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2021 | 03:01 PM
  #2  
Boomerweps's Avatar
5 Year Member
Veteran: Navy
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 2,357
Likes: 1,186
From: Franklin, PA
Default

The turbo V6 is NOT the universal replacement for the normally aspirated V8.
Snow Plow Prep Package REQUIRES the V8.
HDPP V8 capacity a little better than the HDPP 3.5EB.
A bigger displacement engine apparently can better handle the higher weight loads, at all temperatures, in the long term. Surprise!
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2021 | 05:03 PM
  #3  
Gene K's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,880
Likes: 707
Default

Originally Posted by Boomerweps
The turbo V6 is NOT the universal replacement for the normally aspirated V8.
Snow Plow Prep Package REQUIRES the V8.
HDPP V8 capacity a little better than the HDPP 3.5EB.
A bigger displacement engine apparently can better handle the higher weight loads, at all temperatures, in the long term. Surprise!
I'm aware of the snowplow limitation but I'm trying to figure out why the 5.0 is so much lighter in only one Cab/Chassis/Powertrain combination. I was thinking I remembered at one time the 36 gal tank may not have been included with the regular cab.

Reply
Old Mar 25, 2021 | 06:48 PM
  #4  
rd.king's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 538
Likes: 427
Default

the 36 is standard with HDPP.
I like that max tow is standard with HDPP now on the 5.0.
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2021 | 09:31 PM
  #5  
Gene K's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,880
Likes: 707
Default

Originally Posted by rd.king
the 36 is standard with HDPP.
I like that max tow is standard with HDPP now on the 5.0.
​​​​​​
Okay, I built one on the build and price site and it includes the 36 gallon tank. I'm stumped how they get an extra 66 lb out of the 5.0 in that configuration.

Last edited by Gene K; Mar 25, 2021 at 09:42 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2021 | 12:26 AM
  #6  
Flamingtaco's Avatar
5 Year Member
Veteran: Marine Corp
5 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 9,099
Likes: 3,211
From: Kentucky
Default

Originally Posted by Boomerweps
The turbo V6 is NOT the universal replacement for the normally aspirated V8.
Snow Plow Prep Package REQUIRES the V8.
HDPP V8 capacity a little better than the HDPP 3.5EB.
A bigger displacement engine apparently can better handle the higher weight loads, at all temperatures, in the long term. Surprise!
Where do these assumptions come from? The only thing we actually know is they do not offer the snow prep with an eco because of disruption of airflow through the intercooler. There are no fans behind the cooler to pull air through. Having a blade in front of the truck means very hot intake air, and very hot intake air is not good. Ford could have easily remedied that issue with... fans! But good lord, we've got enough options across enough chassis and driveline configurations to satisfy a deranged dictator. None of the rest of the eco's need fans down there, and why in the hell would you make them for *maybe* a few hundred trucks optioned each year. Sounds like some don't understand that 95% of snow plow packages are in super duties.

If we're going to make assumptions, it should be that the 3.5 eco holding a 1000lb higher tow and GCWR than the 5.0 says the 5.0 is not the best at higher weight loads, at all temperatures, in the long term. I wouldn't say that, but if assumptions are to be declared as rule...

Around and around we go! You can build any displacement engine to have any strength you need and remove as much heat as you want. Ford could have designed either motor to be the best at both categories, and yet only one gets the highest tow and gross combined weight ratings, which tells us that one may have been built just a bit tougher than the other, but no one outside Ford's engineering teams knows, and we'll never find out because we spend way too much time speculating about petty nothingness.

Both engines are GREAT at what they do. As are the 2.7 and 3.3, and probably the 3.0 as well. A whole lot of tough hearts for our light duty trucks.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2021 | 11:18 AM
  #7  
Boomerweps's Avatar
5 Year Member
Veteran: Navy
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 2,357
Likes: 1,186
From: Franklin, PA
Default

Originally Posted by Flamingtaco
Where do these assumptions come from?
SNIP
Both engines are GREAT at what they do. As are the 2.7 and 3.3, and probably the 3.0 as well. A whole lot of tough hearts for our light duty trucks.
I read too often posts claiming the 5.0 is a bad engine for towing, no kidding. It colors my opinions/reactions.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2021 | 12:31 PM
  #8  
Brad34's Avatar
5 Year Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 720
Likes: 297
From: Twin Cities, MN
Default

I thought I read somewhere that the 5.0 weighs about 50 lbs less than the 3.5. Maybe that's where the payload difference comes from? This was a couple years ago, so maybe the newest gen 5.0 is a bit lighter even?
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2021 | 01:48 PM
  #9  
JaseBosto's Avatar
Senior Member
Veteran: Navy
5 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 3,236
Likes: 1,677
From: Somewhere on the south side of Heaven.
Default

Originally Posted by Boomerweps
I read too often posts claiming the 5.0 is a bad engine for towing, no kidding. It colors my opinions/reactions.
A bad engine for towing?

I wouldn't say I see an abundance of posts saying that. What does come to mind is plenty of posts claiming you have to crank the rpm's out of it to pull the load good.
Its no secret that its peak torque is at a high rpm. Thats not a characteristic I prefer, which is one reason I went with the EB. But I dealt with that kind of torque curve on my Chevy vortecs. I had to make my 6.0 LQ4 scream like a raped ape in my 2500HD to pull loads.
And then theres the oil consumption issue.
But a bad engine? No.

Now we will see what cylinder deactivation does to the 5.0. Hopefully it wont turn it into a pile of crap like GM's early attempts.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2021 | 01:54 PM
  #10  
Gene K's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,880
Likes: 707
Default

Originally Posted by Brad34
I thought I read somewhere that the 5.0 weighs about 50 lbs less than the 3.5. Maybe that's where the payload difference comes from? This was a couple years ago, so maybe the newest gen 5.0 is a bit lighter even?
Their is about 50 lb difference on two SuperCrew 4x4 3.31 geared trucks but 40 lb of that is the rear axle.

The 10 lb difference on the SuperCrew 4x4 HDPP between engines is what I would expect. So where did they get 76 lb on the Reg Cab 4x2 (The truck they use to advertise that 3300 lb payload)?

Last edited by Gene K; Mar 30, 2021 at 01:56 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:33 PM.