Topic Sponsor
2011+ Engine Related Questions Sub-Forum to the new engines that debuted in 2011.

Fastlane tuned ecoboost track times

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-03-2011, 10:03 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
TheKurgan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 211
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Not happy with that. Back to the drawing board.
Old 10-03-2011, 10:14 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
klumb15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 674
Received 56 Likes on 40 Posts

Default

Not impressed. Roughly a 21 hp gain.
Old 10-03-2011, 11:28 PM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
BoostedXLT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Lake Stevens,WA
Posts: 245
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Is this on an EB or a 5.0, it was nver clarified. I would say that looks more like 5.0 numbers.
Old 10-03-2011, 11:31 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
SICKQK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Tuxedo NY
Posts: 182
Received 13 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Joewee3.5
If you take the 60' from the tuned run and add it to the untuned run you'd be running a 14.8. A 2mph increase in trap does not mean 90whp no matter how you slice it. Is there some data logging happening on these runs? If the tuned version is really ripping out of the hole that much harder then hp is being pulled further down the track.
Yup......the better 60' time accounts for almost all of the improvement. There is really no evidence of any appreciable HP increase.
Old 10-04-2011, 12:05 AM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
HP ADDICT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 98
Received 16 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BoostedXLT
Is this on an EB or a 5.0, it was nver clarified. I would say that looks more like 5.0 numbers.
Reread the title.
Old 10-04-2011, 07:30 AM
  #26  
Member
 
twbrown44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Warner Robins, Ga
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by engineermike
Looks like 15.4 to 14.6 to me. And yes, some have run as quickly as 14.4 stock. However, a lot of things go into the quarter mile time, so it's best to look at the improvements rather than the number. 0.8 in the quarter is a HUGE gain. Send that tuner to the guy running 14.4 stock and see what happens...
I would be willing to try out this tuner. My best so far is 14.39@95.5.

Terry
Old 10-04-2011, 08:24 AM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
klumb15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 674
Received 56 Likes on 40 Posts

Default

Track times mean nothing. Your MPH has everything to do with measuring HP increase. I got a feeling somebody was doing a bit of sandbagging the first run.

Last edited by klumb15; 10-07-2011 at 12:30 PM.
Old 10-04-2011, 08:51 AM
  #28  
Member
 
No1ford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Xxxx
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Dan@Fastlane
Just so every one knows the exact numbers


tuned

RT .049
60ft 2.092
330 6.037
1/8th 9.34
MPH 74.59
1000 12.175
ET 14.56
MPH 93.18
What track was this done at? What state? Elevation? Was this someone first time drag racing?
Old 10-04-2011, 08:55 AM
  #29  
Member
 
No1ford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Xxxx
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post

Default

Did the speed limiter get removed?
Old 10-04-2011, 09:28 AM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
ecoscrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 290
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

DA (density altitude) is very important when discussing track times. Without it, #'s are impossible to compare. My G8 could run mid-upper 12's with 0 DA and low 13's with 2,500+ DA.

i had this webpage on my smartphone and would check it @ the track. I was a junky. http://www.dragtimes.com/da-density-...calculator.php


Quick Reply: Fastlane tuned ecoboost track times



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:44 PM.