Topic Sponsor
2011+ Engine Related Questions Sub-Forum to the new engines that debuted in 2011.

Ecoboost condensate drain hole, post your results here

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-29-2016, 12:08 AM
  #1721  
International man of Myst
 
LastResort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: PNW
Posts: 667
Received 166 Likes on 103 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by snobdds
If you think so, I'll flatter you...

But don't act like it's rocket science either. It's simply a hole in the intake tract...

Maybe you don't know how perspective works...?
It's not a question of perspective it's a question of physics, engineering and data.
Old 01-29-2016, 12:20 AM
  #1722  
Senior Member
 
snobdds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 652
Received 189 Likes on 119 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LastResort
It's not a question of perspective it's a question of physics, engineering and data.
Well of course it is...

Where is that turbo rpm data of yours, with and without the hole? Or should we just look at vacuum and leakage?
Old 01-29-2016, 01:29 AM
  #1723  
International man of Myst
 
LastResort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: PNW
Posts: 667
Received 166 Likes on 103 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by snobdds
Well of course it is...

Where is that turbo rpm data of yours, with and without the hole? Or should we just look at vacuum and leakage?
You haven't provided any data, only conjecture based on poor understanding of the systems involved. Dozens(hundreds?) of people have had success with an increase in performance, which constitutes data. We know there is no vacuum in the intercooler, that's the result of concentrated engineering efforts. And the hole is a known leak with a known effect, which is the physics. Hence my original comment: you don't understand any of this works.

Last edited by LastResort; 01-29-2016 at 01:31 AM.
The following users liked this post:
tuxedoblk_5.oh (01-29-2016)
Old 01-29-2016, 06:01 AM
  #1724  
Senior Member
 
vozaday's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Alberta
Posts: 1,209
Received 146 Likes on 130 Posts

Default

While Geoff is correct a boost leak isn't necessarily a good idea. But he also states that the PCV itself creates too large of a boost leak. Please remember that he is selling a product, which with the new bov on the elbow does solve the issue, and that is why he pushes the statement. Most people don't want to buy an aftermarket intercooler to fix the problem. So while he is correct that a system should not have a leak at all, I would rather take the leak than attempt to pass someone and have the shudder.

And as an end all question I ask you this... How many turbos do you see blowing? Very very few, so in the end this is a non-issue.
The following 2 users liked this post by vozaday:
93CobraOH (01-29-2016), MCDavis (01-29-2016)
Old 01-29-2016, 06:03 AM
  #1725  
Senior Member
 
vozaday's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Alberta
Posts: 1,209
Received 146 Likes on 130 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by engineermike
The intercooler does not run in vacuum.
I am very happy to see that you are still on the forum and helping people with this problem and understanding how the system works. Thank you.
The following users liked this post:
engineermike (01-29-2016)
Old 01-29-2016, 07:26 AM
  #1726  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
engineermike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Gonzales, La
Posts: 5,465
Received 1,562 Likes on 994 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by snobdds
...Where is that turbo rpm data of yours, with and without the hole? Or should we just look at vacuum and leakage?
Already posted. On the stock truck, the turbo spins approximately 160,000 rpm at max rpm max boost. With the 1/16" hole, it goes to 160,200 rpm. These turbos can safely spin 190,000 rpm and higher. Spinning 0.1% faster will do less damage than passing through a critical, which happens very often.
The following 2 users liked this post by engineermike:
93CobraOH (01-29-2016), Tothemax (01-29-2016)
Old 01-29-2016, 07:29 AM
  #1727  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
engineermike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Gonzales, La
Posts: 5,465
Received 1,562 Likes on 994 Posts

Question

Originally Posted by LastResort
It's not a question of perspective it's a question of physics, engineering and data.
Honestly, I've moved on to a supercharged 5.0, but I still like the physics and thermo side of it.
The following 2 users liked this post by engineermike:
93CobraOH (01-29-2016), LastResort (01-29-2016)
Old 01-29-2016, 07:45 AM
  #1728  
Member
 
papa tiger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 32,108
Received 239 Likes on 223 Posts

Default

So drill the tiny hole with the confidence you can get around a 18 wheeler ******* up a 4500' high mountain side while your pulling your 68 on a trailer. Lol
The following users liked this post:
93CobraOH (01-29-2016)
Old 01-29-2016, 10:02 AM
  #1729  
Senior Member
 
vozaday's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Alberta
Posts: 1,209
Received 146 Likes on 130 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by papa tiger
So drill the tiny hole with the confidence you can get around a 18 wheeler ******* up a 4500' high mountain side while your pulling your 68 on a trailer. Lol
It's a 71
Old 01-29-2016, 10:28 AM
  #1730  
Senior Member
 
snobdds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 652
Received 189 Likes on 119 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by engineermike
Already posted. On the stock truck, the turbo spins approximately 160,000 rpm at max rpm max boost. With the 1/16" hole, it goes to 160,200 rpm. These turbos can safely spin 190,000 rpm and higher. Spinning 0.1% faster will do less damage than passing through a critical, which happens very often.
Well, there we have it...


Quick Reply: Ecoboost condensate drain hole, post your results here



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:50 PM.