Randy M

Damn....this was a thorough beatdown

gentz002

i saw this somewhere else as well.. Supposedly the Gen1 also has a tuner and other performance mods.

Randy M

Wow, that just adds to the beatdown then. Wonder how much more it would have been beaten if the Gen I was stock.

Jkry2121

Says 2010: 6.2 w/ intake, sct tuner, roush exhaust in description of the youtube video. He got spanked with a gap lol.

Toddman38

iTrader: (5)

So much, for that Throaty V8 rumble... lmao

jaytperry

too bad he didnt have that gen 1 with the supercharger, i think with the supercharger it would have did just what the the gen2 did. honestly though both a great trucks. personally i like the v8 better. going down the road with an angry bumblebee is fun sure, but it doesnt feel the same.

Martian

NASSTY

Of course a Gen1 with $7k in mods should beat a stock Gen2. But with about $1k in mods it got waxed by a stock Gen2.

jaytperry

Well I figured if the next generation is turbocharged, its not really fair to compare a naturally aspirated to forced induction. I naturally figured supercharger would even the odds a bit. Then again similar trucks but also very different. The newer gen has more bells and whistles, better fuel efficiency, also lighter, more suspension travel. It's a nice truck really. You would want it to spank the previous generation right otherwise you wouldn't buy it. For the most part I have owned 6 cylinder trucks. Not because I wanted fuel efficiency, it's just what the truck had. I never liked the exhaust note.

fsae150

Then by that logic you should also increase the displacement of the 2nd gen truck from 3.5L to 6.2L, to make the race "even" again......

I think most peoplw want to see which truck is faster stock vs stock, not to compare which truck would win with identical powertrains.....