Topic Sponsor
1997 - 2003 Ford F150 General discussion on the Ford 1997 - 2003 F150 truck.

Mustang wheels

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 10, 2020 | 07:38 AM
  #1  
Davist's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 2
Likes: 1
Default Mustang wheels

Just wondering if a set of SVO Mustang wheels will hold up on my little 1998 short bed f-150. I know hud adaptors will be required. My truck weighs 4300 lbs and I’m concerned it might be a little heavy for them. Has anyone else tried this
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2020 | 07:41 AM
  #2  
River1's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 3,627
Likes: 795
From: Michigan
Default

I think you'll find the lug pattern won't match. That would be in distances, not the number lugs.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2020 | 08:29 AM
  #3  
Davist's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 2
Likes: 1
Default

Yeah that’s why I said hud adaptors would be required. What I concerned with is the weight of the truck exceeding the weight limit of the wheels
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2020 | 08:50 AM
  #4  
River1's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 3,627
Likes: 795
From: Michigan
Default

My mistake, sorry, I read adaptors but saw offsets. lol I wouldn't use adapters for anything. If I had to use the Mustang wheels I would first look at the trucks current hubs and see how they would work with offsetting the current lug pattern 72* and see if the hub can be machined for a new lug pattern. If that didn't work, I'd look in to machining the rims to the trucks pattern offset to the current pattern by the same 72*. First I'd look in to new truck axles being machined to the Mustang lug pattern or axles that have no lug pattern so I could do it or have done myself. This is real Cuban gear head solutions because they had no access to new parts and had to make what they have work. And it doesn't help that you want to keep the year of the Mustang wheels a secret. If the Mustang wheels are Mustang II 4 lug wheels I wouldn't consider any of this. JMO but adaptors are for those people who find the pleasure in vehicles as a matter of having their vehicle looking like what they think is cool and throwing money at their ideas instead of making that their last solution. Honestly, your best option is to save your money and get rims made for the truck. Again, JMO.

Last edited by River1; Jan 10, 2020 at 10:04 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2020 | 09:19 AM
  #5  
JCR 56's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 3,656
Likes: 1,028
From: KY.
Default

Definitely get the correct wheels for the truck.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2020 | 09:44 AM
  #6  
RVT1KR's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 214
Likes: 70
From: Huntsville, AL
Default

The offset of the wheels would look ridiculous and may not clear the front calipers. Look at a set of Mustang wheels on a mid 90-s to 2011 Ranger. It would be worse on an F-150.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2020 | 01:07 PM
  #7  
FranklinF150's Avatar
Tinkering with trucks
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 104
Likes: 18
From: Franklin, TN
Default

I have seen adapters used in bunches of ways and have never heard of a failure, not to say they couldn’t. I had adapters on a Jeep, no problemo. There is another post just a couple of days ago, guy installing late model F150 rims using Hubcentric adapters which has an excellent rating.

As for them rims; I’ve been considering the same with a 1.125 thick adapter. Late model Mustang GT in 17. Having been a P71 owner, this was a common swap, no adapters needed, heavy car, severe duty.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2020 | 01:20 PM
  #8  
River1's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 3,627
Likes: 795
From: Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by FranklinF150
I have seen adapters used in bunches of ways and have never heard of a failure, not to say they couldn’t. I had adapters on a Jeep, no problemo. There is another post just a couple of days ago, guy installing late model F150 rims using Hubcentric adapters which has an excellent rating.

As for them rims; I’ve been considering the same with a 1.125 thick adapter. Late model Mustang GT in 17. Having been a P71 owner, this was a common swap, no adapters needed, heavy car, severe duty.
You can do what you like with your vehicles but sometime to the math with what that 2.25" is doing to you steering, brakes and suspension starting with kingpin angle and scrub. It's not for the better.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2020 | 03:23 PM
  #9  
FranklinF150's Avatar
Tinkering with trucks
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 104
Likes: 18
From: Franklin, TN
Default

Originally Posted by River1
You can do what you like with your vehicles but sometime to the math with what that 2.25" is doing to you steering, brakes and suspension starting with kingpin angle and scrub. It's not for the better.
1.25, not 2.25. I’ve used them with zero issues. Same as using wheels with different offsets than factory which probably happens a few thousand times a day. 😂
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2020 | 05:10 PM
  #10  
River1's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 3,627
Likes: 795
From: Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by FranklinF150
1.25, not 2.25. I’ve used them with zero issues. Same as using wheels with different offsets than factory which probably happens a few thousand times a day. 😂
My mistake. I just thought you would use them on both sides.

Last edited by River1; Jan 13, 2020 at 07:54 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:41 PM.