Ford F150 Forum - Community of Ford Truck Fans

Topic Sponsor
1997 - 2003 Ford F150 General discussion on the Ford 1997 - 2003 F150 truck.

Engine Builders talk.

   
Old 10-03-2014, 02:58 PM
  #4191  
Senior Member
 
jferg92's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 10,731
Received 171 Likes on 162 Posts

Default
6.5' bed+supercrew anyone?
Attached Thumbnails Engine Builders talk.-image-2716155468.jpg   Engine Builders talk.-image-4191224480.jpg   Engine Builders talk.-image-3181461199.jpg  
Attached Images  
jferg92 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 10-03-2014, 03:08 PM
  #4192  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
fordmotorsport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,733
Received 56 Likes on 54 Posts
Default
Originally Posted by jferg92
6.5' bed+supercrew anyone?
that is fugly
fordmotorsport is offline  
Reply Like
Old 10-03-2014, 03:23 PM
  #4193  
Senior Member
 
Wolvee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,671
Received 426 Likes on 323 Posts

Default
If a 14 year old truck wasn't such a bad investment for big money mods, I'd lengthen the frame and add a flareside. There's a company out west that does this stuff exclusively.

It just doesn't make sense when I could buy a newer F150 Screw with a long bed from the factory.
Wolvee is offline  
Reply Like
Old 10-03-2014, 05:13 PM
  #4194  
Senior Member
 
Cmanjr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 14,978
Received 141 Likes on 134 Posts
Default
Originally Posted by Wolvee
If a 14 year old truck wasn't such a bad investment for big money mods, I'd lengthen the frame and add a flareside. There's a company out west that does this stuff exclusively. It just doesn't make sense when I could buy a newer F150 Screw with a long bed from the factory.
That may be true but to get it all done it would still more than likely be cheaper than to buy a brand new truck from the factory
Cmanjr is offline  
Reply Like
Old 10-03-2014, 05:15 PM
  #4195  
Senior Member
 
jferg92's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 10,731
Received 171 Likes on 162 Posts

Default
It's cool, but it is really disproportional
jferg92 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 10-03-2014, 05:16 PM
  #4196  
Senior Member
 
Cmanjr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 14,978
Received 141 Likes on 134 Posts
Default
Originally Posted by jferg92
It's cool, but it is really disproportional
Not any more than a long bed super cab
Cmanjr is offline  
Reply Like
Old 10-03-2014, 06:20 PM
  #4197  
Senior Member
 
Carcrazygts2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,381
Received 434 Likes on 419 Posts

Default
Not to meant the 10th gen having a horrible turning radius from the get go. Just imagine a Screw with a 6.5 bed..
Carcrazygts2 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 10-03-2014, 06:33 PM
  #4198  
Senior Member
 
Cmanjr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 14,978
Received 141 Likes on 134 Posts
Default
Originally Posted by Carcrazygts2
Not to meant the 10th gen having a horrible turning radius from the get go. Just imagine a Screw with a 6.5 bed..
My grandfathers 96 GMC Sierra regular cab long bed has an even worse turning radius
Cmanjr is offline  
Reply Like
Old 10-03-2014, 07:06 PM
  #4199  
Senior Member
 
Carcrazygts2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,381
Received 434 Likes on 419 Posts

Default
Originally Posted by Cmanjr
My grandfathers 96 GMC Sierra regular cab long bed has an even worse turning radius
Ever driven a SCAB Long bed? Its takes a 3 point to make a u-turn on most streets.
Carcrazygts2 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 10-03-2014, 07:54 PM
  #4200  
Senior Member
 
charliedyal's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Tallahassee, Fl
Posts: 2,926
Received 144 Likes on 134 Posts

Default
[MENTION=76903]fordmotorsport[/MENTION], found your truck....

Engine Builders talk.-forumrunner_20141003_195419.jpg
charliedyal is offline  
Reply Like

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Advanced Search
Quick Reply: Engine Builders talk.


Reply Closed Thread Share

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:10 PM.