Topic Sponsor
1997 - 2003 Ford F150 General discussion on the Ford 1997 - 2003 F150 truck.

Engine Builders talk.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 3, 2014 | 02:58 PM
  #4191  
jferg92's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 10,731
Likes: 172
Default

6.5' bed+supercrew anyone?
Attached Thumbnails Engine Builders talk.-image-2716155468.jpg   Engine Builders talk.-image-4191224480.jpg   Engine Builders talk.-image-3181461199.jpg  
Attached Images  
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2014 | 03:08 PM
  #4192  
fordmotorsport's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,733
Likes: 56
Default

Originally Posted by jferg92
6.5' bed+supercrew anyone?
that is fugly
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2014 | 03:23 PM
  #4193  
Wolvee's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,672
Likes: 433
Default

If a 14 year old truck wasn't such a bad investment for big money mods, I'd lengthen the frame and add a flareside. There's a company out west that does this stuff exclusively.

It just doesn't make sense when I could buy a newer F150 Screw with a long bed from the factory.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2014 | 05:13 PM
  #4194  
Cmanjr's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 14,978
Likes: 143
From: Northern Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by Wolvee
If a 14 year old truck wasn't such a bad investment for big money mods, I'd lengthen the frame and add a flareside. There's a company out west that does this stuff exclusively. It just doesn't make sense when I could buy a newer F150 Screw with a long bed from the factory.
That may be true but to get it all done it would still more than likely be cheaper than to buy a brand new truck from the factory
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2014 | 05:15 PM
  #4195  
jferg92's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 10,731
Likes: 172
Default

It's cool, but it is really disproportional
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2014 | 05:16 PM
  #4196  
Cmanjr's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 14,978
Likes: 143
From: Northern Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by jferg92
It's cool, but it is really disproportional
Not any more than a long bed super cab
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2014 | 06:20 PM
  #4197  
Carcrazygts2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,381
Likes: 435
Default

Not to meant the 10th gen having a horrible turning radius from the get go. Just imagine a Screw with a 6.5 bed..
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2014 | 06:33 PM
  #4198  
Cmanjr's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 14,978
Likes: 143
From: Northern Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by Carcrazygts2
Not to meant the 10th gen having a horrible turning radius from the get go. Just imagine a Screw with a 6.5 bed..
My grandfathers 96 GMC Sierra regular cab long bed has an even worse turning radius
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2014 | 07:06 PM
  #4199  
Carcrazygts2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,381
Likes: 435
Default

Originally Posted by Cmanjr
My grandfathers 96 GMC Sierra regular cab long bed has an even worse turning radius
Ever driven a SCAB Long bed? Its takes a 3 point to make a u-turn on most streets.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2014 | 07:54 PM
  #4200  
charliedyal's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,926
Likes: 144
From: Tallahassee, Fl
Default

[MENTION=76903]fordmotorsport[/MENTION], found your truck....

Engine Builders talk.-forumrunner_20141003_195419.jpg
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:04 AM.