Topic Sponsor
1997 - 2003 Ford F150 General discussion on the Ford 1997 - 2003 F150 truck.

Electric Fan Update

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 5, 2015 | 06:39 PM
  #1  
Topline Mike's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 205
Likes: 17
From: So. WI
Default Electric Fan Update

I searched and found many threads on this subject, and read them all. Most of them were a few years old though. So what's the latest way to go if I'm going to do this? I have seen a few company's that make the conversion kit for late model fords, but they are not cheap, costing more than $400. If I'm gaining 2 mpg's, this just doesn't do it for me.

I generally drive around 15000 miles per year. If my truck gets 16 mpg, then I buy 937.5 gallons of gas per year, at lets say $2.40 a gallon, for a total of $2250. Now if my truck gets 18 mpg, then I use 833 gallons, for a total cost of $2000. A cost savings of $250 per year.

I could see spending $200 or less on this conversion to make it worthwhile. What's the best fan to get with the controller that isn't having any issues?
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2015 | 08:51 PM
  #2  
Wolvee's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,672
Likes: 433
Default

Anyone know if Troyer Performance is still in business? THey had the best priced retail kit on the market but not the best business sense.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2015 | 09:36 PM
  #3  
Jbrew's Avatar
98 F150 5.4L E40D/4R100
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 28,523
Likes: 7,633
From: MI
Default

Originally Posted by Topline Mike
I searched and found many threads on this subject, and read them all. Most of them were a few years old though. So what's the latest way to go if I'm going to do this? I have seen a few company's that make the conversion kit for late model fords, but they are not cheap, costing more than $400. If I'm gaining 2 mpg's, this just doesn't do it for me.

I generally drive around 15000 miles per year. If my truck gets 16 mpg, then I buy 937.5 gallons of gas per year, at lets say $2.40 a gallon, for a total of $2250. Now if my truck gets 18 mpg, then I use 833 gallons, for a total cost of $2000. A cost savings of $250 per year.

I could see spending $200 or less on this conversion to make it worthwhile. What's the best fan to get with the controller that isn't having any issues?
There's no way in hell I'd buy anything aftermarket to improve mileage with these trucks... Besides nothing beats good maintenance and sensor updates when warranted.

E-fans are good for one important reason with these trucks and that's to get rid of clutch fan drag. One of the BEST bolt on mods for these engines. You might free up as as 15 HP. But it's a 15 hp you'll definitely notice right off the line and specially towing.

Sure, it will HELP with MPG's. Nothing noticeable by itself. In fact there isn't just one thing. 15-16 on the highway, is about the HONEST max your going to achieve consistently with an engine that's been taken care of.

Never mod for mpgs, - try to find one of those old rabbit diesels on craigs list if you want mpgs. Make sure you stock up on rubber bands.

BTW, - The Troyer kits are good and pricey. They use to have a problem with their controllers. I'm sure that's been worked out by now. Personally, I liked the old Mark VIII kits w/a GOOD spal controller. But the Mark VIII took some amps to get going. Now a days, more kits have been put together and offered to the public. Some good, some most likley bad. I'd have to research more to catch up, but hell, I don't want to take all that fun away from anyone.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2015 | 11:24 PM
  #4  
Carcrazygts2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,381
Likes: 435
Default

I'm using the flexalite kit. I can right 2 mpg isnt going to happen. I got around 1 mpg. The differnce in operating temp while towing was dramatic. Along with the added engine response.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2015 | 11:31 PM
  #5  
MGD's Avatar
MGD
former member
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,092
Likes: 857
Default

The BEST way has not changed.

Motorcraft RF-269 and either a Painless F5 or DCC FK-Series constant-temperature controller.

Nothing else comes close.

MGD
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2015 | 11:57 PM
  #6  
ibd2328's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 8,374
Likes: 533
Default

I am running dual range rover fans and they work perfect. With single one one temp wont very over 2-4 degree idling.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2015 | 01:04 AM
  #7  
Carcrazygts2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,381
Likes: 435
Default

Originally Posted by MGD
The BEST way has not changed.

Motorcraft RF-269 and either a Painless F5 or DCC FK-Series constant-temperature controller.

Nothing else comes close.

MGD
I beg to differ my dual fan setup will cool alot better than any single fan setup.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2015 | 01:59 AM
  #8  
ByrdDogX's Avatar
Ford for Life
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: Memphis, TN Area
Default

Originally Posted by Carcrazygts2
I beg to differ my dual fan setup will cool alot better than any single fan setup.
The Motorcraft RF-269 is a dual fan setup and blows the doors off most any aftermarket setup.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2015 | 11:27 AM
  #9  
Carcrazygts2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,381
Likes: 435
Default

Originally Posted by ByrdDogX
The Motorcraft RF-269 is a dual fan setup and blows the doors off most any aftermarket setup.
After researching it. It wont have a leg to stand on witbh most of the Higher end dual fan setups. RF269 is rated @ 5300CFM. Just one of my Flex-a-lite moves 4500cfm.
Reply
Old May 15, 2015 | 11:21 PM
  #10  
ljscott826's Avatar
curious member
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 612
Likes: 9
From: Weatherford
Default

Any update? Looking at getting some for my 04 have a heavy duty fan clutch and it's loud as all get out. Trying to decide on a good kit
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:10 AM.