Topic Sponsor
2009 - 2014 Ford F150 General discussion on 2009 - 2014 Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Spring rate codes?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 7, 2011 | 11:47 PM
  #11  
Fordrocks39's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 183
Likes: 2
From: Spruce grove
Default

Originally Posted by pfbz

What year, wheelbase, engine, drive, and cab configuration?
2010 screw 6.5' box 5.4l max tow 4x4

Sent from my iPhone using F150 Forum
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2011 | 02:30 AM
  #12  
racrbilly67's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
From: Odenton, MD
Default

Originally Posted by pfbz
OK, one more thought...

I've never seen springs measured in "Pound Force/Foot" but evidently they sometimes are, and it sure sounds like an American car thing to do

If it was in lb/ft, 3900 lb/ft would equal a somewhat plausible 325 lb/in or 5.8K kgf/m.

Yea, I now I'm over-thinking this...

Into physics much?? But your theory here does sound plausible...
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2012 | 03:56 PM
  #13  
Thomas B. Martin's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Default

The confusion about the chart posted by pfbz is because Ford expresses spring rates (and other items) through GAWR (Gross Axle Weight Rating). That is, Ford shows the axle carrying result of the spring rate (and other items), not the spring rate itself. This makes comparison easier, because a) it defines things in a meaningful way and b) it allows comparisons across suspension geometries (spring rate isn't really what you want to know; you want wheel rate, but that depends on both spring rate and suspension design).
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2012 | 04:11 PM
  #14  
pfbz's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,225
Likes: 169
Default

Originally Posted by Thomas B. Martin
The confusion about the chart posted by pfbz is because Ford expresses spring rates (and other items) through GAWR (Gross Axle Weight Rating). That is, Ford shows the axle carrying result of the spring rate (and other items), not the spring rate itself. This makes comparison easier, because a) it defines things in a meaningful way and b) it allows comparisons across suspension geometries (spring rate isn't really what you want to know; you want wheel rate, but that depends on both spring rate and suspension design).
Makes sense. Though while easier to compare Ford springs, it makes it much more difficult to look at changing the front spring rates using easily available coils from a company like Eibach or Moog.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2012 | 08:02 PM
  #15  
hemigod's Avatar
Back from the dark side
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 556
Likes: 14
From: Jacksonville, FL
Default

VVGG
2011 157inch WB 4X4 EB with 7700 Maxtow package
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2012 | 10:15 AM
  #16  
Thomas B. Martin's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by pfbz
Makes sense. Though while easier to compare Ford springs, it makes it much more difficult to look at changing the front spring rates using easily available coils from a company like Eibach or Moog.
Indeed. Ford naturally uses a system that might appeal more to buyers of new Ford trucks. I would add that Ford makes info like this difficult to find, and acts like Max Tow doesn't exist. So, Ford is hardly consumer-friendly on information (for reasons I find inscrutable) for new truck buyers.

Aftermarket companies, as you say, have a different task. Ideally, they would quote spring rate as a percentage of stock (OEM) rate (120%, 150% etc) and name the reference spring or springs. This would obviate the need to dig up OEM spring rates which on some vehicles (not just Ford) are close to impossible to find. I find that they too do a poor job of conveying information, often preferring to make their products seem to be the product of magic.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2012 | 11:09 AM
  #17  
8uzzsaw's Avatar
Canadian Forces
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 136
Likes: 1
From: NB, Canada
Default

So by using the chart on the first page and getting your curb weight for the front and back, you can use that to determine how much weight you should add to your bed for traction in the winter?

For example I have a 2011 Supercab 3.7L 4x4 145wb for 31** lbs front and 22** rear curb weight. I would add about 700-800 lbs to even up my front and back curb weight?

I know many of you don't deal with heavy snow or the winters we have up here in Canada but this could be a nice-to-know number. I only added 350 lbs this year and noticed the rear slide out a fair amount.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2013 | 05:26 PM
  #18  
Magnus1350's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 210
Likes: 31
From: Central Arkansas
Default

Anyone ever figure this out what the codes mean? By the way mine is UUGG for a 2013 F150 SCAB 4x4 145" Max tow. Also here is the 2013 chart. https://www.fleet.ford.com/truckbbas...F-150_v1-1.pdf
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:46 AM.