Topic Sponsor
2009 - 2014 Ford F150 General discussion on 2009 - 2014 Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Solved the ECO MPG problem

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 18, 2014 | 05:56 PM
  #1  
Billy Mulek's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 79
Likes: 6
Default Solved the ECO MPG problem

I traded in my 2013 eco with a rear 3.31 for a 2014 eco with a rear 3.73 and I can't believe the difference in the MPG. I had come to this forum many times before thinking I was one of the lucky ones who didn't have a MPG problem with my eco. Now I come to it and I am one of those who are getting lower MPG.

The gears play and big part in the MPG and I have to wonder if its worse on an ECO compared to the 5.0

For the record I'm not complaining just wanted to note this observation.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2014 | 05:59 PM
  #2  
Billy Mulek's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 79
Likes: 6
Default

I guess I didn't really solve it but have a better understanding on why there is a difference in people's MPG.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2014 | 06:43 PM
  #3  
torinalth's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 610
Likes: 171
Default

gears always play a role. its a balance. too low a ratio and you will need to push the engine harder to accelerate. but generally yes, a lower ratio will yield better MPG while higher ratio will yield better torque multiplication for acceleration.... towing... simply turning the wheels. think of it as using a pulley system for a mechanical advantage.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2014 | 06:49 PM
  #4  
KDD555's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 78
Likes: 5
Default

What was the mpg difference ?
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2014 | 06:52 PM
  #5  
HCFX2013's Avatar
Beer Gut Extraordinaire
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 17,371
Likes: 2,111
From: Canada
Default

Why would you trade a 2013 on a 2014?
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2014 | 07:40 PM
  #6  
zx12-iowa's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 4,146
Likes: 679
From: midwest
Default

WEll not for the better mpg. Lol
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2014 | 08:52 PM
  #7  
Billy Mulek's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 79
Likes: 6
Default

I traded a supercab in on a supercrew. I saw about a 2 mpg drop in mixed everyday driving and a 3.5 on Highway miles.

The 3.31 and the 3.73 have no difference in acceleration, with all the torque the eco provides you don't notice a difference.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2014 | 09:03 PM
  #8  
HCFX2013's Avatar
Beer Gut Extraordinaire
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 17,371
Likes: 2,111
From: Canada
Default

Originally Posted by Billy Mulek
I traded a supercab in on a supercrew. I saw about a 2 mpg drop in mixed everyday driving and a 3.5 on Highway miles.

The 3.31 and the 3.73 have no difference in acceleration, with all the torque the eco provides you don't notice a difference.
Makes much more sense, not that you needed to justify anything.

It does make sense though that 3.73's will turn lower MPG numbers. The 3.73 turns a little higher RPM on the highway, which may cause the Eco to kick the turbos in more frequently. Boost = fuel. I had an Ecoboost with 3.73's and now have a 5.0 with 3.55's. I have driven many 5.0's with 3.73's and there really isn't a huge difference except maybe a bit in the low end. With that said, my 2009 Silverado with the 4 speed trans and 4.10 gears averaged 18MPG on the highway.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2014 | 09:07 PM
  #9  
jcain's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,595
Likes: 461
From: Las Vegas
Default

Originally Posted by Billy Mulek
I traded a supercab in on a supercrew. I saw about a 2 mpg drop in mixed everyday driving and a 3.5 on Highway miles.

The 3.31 and the 3.73 have no difference in acceleration, with all the torque the eco provides you don't notice a difference.
You also gained some weight from scab to screw config.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2014 | 09:09 PM
  #10  
Harps's Avatar
5 Year Member
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 211
Likes: 63
From: Vancouver, BC
Default

I am getting about 11 / 12mpg with the 3.73, 65% city and 35% highway.
Company pays the gas so I don't care and i stomp on the right pedal at every opportunity.
Love the power from such a big vehicle.

Screw with a cap
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:16 PM.