Topic Sponsor
2009 - 2014 Ford F150 General discussion on 2009 - 2014 Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Ford's EcoBoost output compared to the new Dodge Hellcat. AMAZING!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-29-2014, 07:27 PM
  #1  
Retired and loving it!

Thread Starter
 
Adobe2X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 4,810
Received 536 Likes on 398 Posts

Default Ford's EcoBoost output compared to the new Dodge Hellcat. AMAZING!!

There has been some talk here about the EcoBoost's output, and whether it is truly a "high performance" motor from the factory. The media and the public are falling all over themselves talking about the output and performance of the new "Hellcat" Hemi in the new Challenger and Charger at 707 HP and 650 Lb/Ft of torque.
Here are some comparisons of the specific output per cubic inch for each of the engines. I think that the results speak for themselves as to whether the EcoBoost is a high performance engine:

EcoBoost
3.5 Liter = 213.7 cubic inches
365 HP = 1.7 HP per CI
420 lb/ft = 1.97 per ci (89 octane!)

Hellcat
6.2 Liter = 378.3 cubic inches
707 HP = 1.8 HP per CI
650 lb/ft = 1.72 per ci (requires 91)



And on 91 octane for the EcoBoost:
370 HP = 1.73 HP per ci
430 lb/ft = 2.01 per ci


I'd say that the EcoBoost, for the size it is, can hang with the highest performance engine ever offered in a pony car or 4 door sedan!....I mean c'mon--- 15% more torque per cubic inch than the mighty Hellcat!
Heck, if the Hellcat produced the same amount of torque per cubic inch as the EB, it would make 760.4 lb/ft instead of a puny 650!

Last edited by Adobe2X; 11-29-2014 at 11:58 PM.
The following users liked this post:
Melvin Garib (12-06-2014)
Old 11-29-2014, 07:31 PM
  #2  
Senior Member

 
NASSTY's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: ME
Posts: 12,007
Received 3,933 Likes on 2,510 Posts

Default

Uh oh, here come the haterz.
The following users liked this post:
MCDavis (11-29-2014)
Old 11-29-2014, 07:34 PM
  #3  
Retired and loving it!

Thread Starter
 
Adobe2X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 4,810
Received 536 Likes on 398 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NASSTY
Uh oh, here come the haterz.
Perhaps............but FACTS are facts. The figures are irrefutable.....just think what these figures would be on some of the tuned EcoBoosts!
Old 11-29-2014, 07:35 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
z.l.davis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: NC
Posts: 445
Received 69 Likes on 53 Posts

Default

Give me the funds and I'll drop my ecoboost like a bad habit for one if those babies
Old 11-29-2014, 07:38 PM
  #5  
Senior Member

 
NASSTY's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: ME
Posts: 12,007
Received 3,933 Likes on 2,510 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by sterlingone
Perhaps............but FACTS are facts. The figures are irrefutable.....just think what these figures would be on some of the tuned EcoBoosts!
I understand completely. Sort of like my Grand National that was 245 hp stock and is now pushing 500hp with a tune and a few simple bolt ons.
Old 11-29-2014, 07:40 PM
  #6  
Retired and loving it!

Thread Starter
 
Adobe2X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 4,810
Received 536 Likes on 398 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by z.l.davis
Give me the funds and I'll drop my ecoboost like a bad habit for one if those babies
Well, I can understand that --- but did you know that the Charger Hellcat weighs 4,600 pounds? That is not a whole lot less than the 2015 F-150!
Still, a top speed of
204 mph

is pretty impressive for a family sized four door.

Last edited by Adobe2X; 11-29-2014 at 11:59 PM.
Old 11-29-2014, 07:43 PM
  #7  
Retired and loving it!

Thread Starter
 
Adobe2X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 4,810
Received 536 Likes on 398 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NASSTY
I understand completely. Sort of like my Grand National that was 245 hp stock and is now pushing 500hp with a tune and a few simple bolt ons.
GNX? The GN's are one of the most beautiful cars ever made. Hard to believe that the powers that be at that time at GM permitted a car to be made that could embarass the same year Corvette!
Old 11-29-2014, 07:46 PM
  #8  
One Clean Machine
iTrader: (5)
 
Toddman38's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 10,455
Received 1,614 Likes on 1,350 Posts

Default

Hellcats a Tank, and a Dodge! Ill take a 2015 Z06! Thanks
Old 11-29-2014, 07:51 PM
  #9  
Retired and loving it!

Thread Starter
 
Adobe2X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 4,810
Received 536 Likes on 398 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Toddman34
Hellcats a Tank, and a Dodge! Ill take a 2015 Z06! Thanks
I love the C7's new interior, suspension, engine and transmission.........there are some angles that I like the styling, and others that it is just hideous. I've owned both a C5 and C6, both of which I think are better looking than the C7.
It is amazing that the new ZO6 has more power than the old ZR1....and can be had with an automatic and removable or convertible roof!

Last edited by Adobe2X; 11-30-2014 at 11:13 AM.
The following 2 users liked this post by Adobe2X:
Rubyredlimited (12-02-2014), Toddman38 (11-29-2014)
Old 11-29-2014, 07:51 PM
  #10  
Senior Member

 
NASSTY's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: ME
Posts: 12,007
Received 3,933 Likes on 2,510 Posts

Default

Call me crazy but I'd take a 2014 GT 500 with only 662hp over a Hellcat. Name:  crazy.gif
Views: 236
Size:  453 Bytes
The following 2 users liked this post by NASSTY:
brucesears (11-29-2014), vozaday (12-05-2014)


Quick Reply: Ford's EcoBoost output compared to the new Dodge Hellcat. AMAZING!!



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:33 PM.