Topic Sponsor
2009 - 2014 Ford F150 General discussion on 2009 - 2014 Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

finally good mpg

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 14, 2018 | 01:29 PM
  #1  
stevehin's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 65
Likes: 3
Default finally good mpg

I bought a new f150, eco 3.5,2011, 6.5 bed, 3.73 rear. I have 33k on it. Not used much. Never got good mpg as in 18-20. My average over 33k is 13.8. Just this weekend, I get good mileage, I didn't change anything. Back roads and some highway, total 66 miles, 19.4 mpg. A nice surprise. No way to explain it. I may drive it some more now.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2018 | 01:33 PM
  #2  
RLXXI's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 26,680
Likes: 6,253
From: Big Easy
Default

If you live in a northern climate they probably changed from winter to summer blend fuel.
.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2018 | 03:34 PM
  #3  
marshallr's Avatar
5 Year Member
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 3,675
Likes: 1,721
From: Georgia
Default

Wind resistance kills fuel mileage on trucks. Driving on back roads with little stop and go traffic at speeds under 60mph will give you the best fuel mileage. Get up to 65 or 70 and you'll lose 2-3 mpg. Steady speeds over 70 will kill you as does true city driving.

And only 66 miles doesn't mean much. I once got 36 mpg over a stretch of road for 40 miles. It was all downhill, in a rural area. with no stops or other traffic. Never touched the skinny pedal and rarely the brakes. I controlled speed by shifting up and down as needed.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2018 | 11:52 PM
  #4  
blue rabit's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Default

That wind resistance doesn't just affect trucks. It's the reason so many states have a 50 or 55 mph limit on state roads. Get much above that and the drag really starts to matter. The math for the force due to air drag is based on the square of the speed.

Other than the occasional observation at the pump, I also didn't really watch my driving versus fuel consumption until I got an electric car for my commuter. If you have a friend you can borrow one from, its worth the experience just to play with it. With so much less range, just a few miles on the interstate really shows how much you pay for high speeds.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2019 | 01:16 PM
  #5  
jetrep's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 248
Likes: 52
Default

It's not the weight of the trailer it's the aerodynamic drag that it creates. Your post gives me hope. I'm pulling a Uhaul 5x8 across the country next week. I was planning for 10-11mpg.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2019 | 01:24 PM
  #6  
jetrep's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 248
Likes: 52
Default

I played around with the calculator on this website: https://www.vcalc.com/wiki/vCalc/Force+of+Drag

If you assume just 15 square feet of trailer presented to the wind (the trailer is certainly more) and a speed of 75mph you get a force of 211LB. That's quite an additional constant force on the truck. It does not factor in weight of the trailer, drag from the wheels/tires, etc.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2019 | 03:14 PM
  #7  
jetrep's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 248
Likes: 52
Default

Originally Posted by jetrep
It's not the weight of the trailer it's the aerodynamic drag that it creates. Your post gives me hope. I'm pulling a Uhaul 5x8 across the country next week. I was planning for 10-11mpg.
Sorry folks just realized this landed in the wrong thread.
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:35 AM.