Topic Sponsor
2009 - 2014 Ford F150 General discussion on 2009 - 2014 Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Ethanol VS Gas MPG

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-25-2011, 01:20 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
jhight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Interesting. I posted some of the same reservations about ETOH on a different thread that many of you here posted. I was promptly taken to task for being an "Ivory Tower dwelling, elitist liberal, who doesn't know anything about the 'real world'."

Guess that's what I get for using big words.

Doesn't matter that I grew up poor, or how often my knuckles were bloody, or how many sacrifices I had to make to earn my education.

If someone disagrees with you, it's much easier to ignore their arguments, and ignore their evidence. Just paint them as something you hate and try to get others to agree with you.
Old 05-25-2011, 02:16 PM
  #22  
Senior almost
Thread Starter
 
2010FX4F150GILROY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: no where **** off land
Posts: 1,838
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

The test is finished I edited to the bottom of the first page of this thread please read there thanks...........
Old 05-25-2011, 02:25 PM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
Oilfieldtrash's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2010FX4F150GILROY
The test is finished I edited to the bottom of the first page of this thread please read there thanks...........
So at what price difference are you getting ahead with e85? 80 cents, 90,?
Old 05-25-2011, 02:34 PM
  #24  
Senior almost
Thread Starter
 
2010FX4F150GILROY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: no where **** off land
Posts: 1,838
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Its not really a fixed dollar or cents difference it is a percentage less.. In my test the percentage comes in around 20% less then its cost effective.... At 9.99 per gallon ethanol has to be about 7.99 per gallon or 2.00 less, 20%.... At 20% it makes sense to use Ethanol, if there is a station close by.... 4.00 per gallon for regular unleaded I would need ethanol to be 3.20 per gallon to beak even.... Then if ethanol is less, then by all means it is cheaper...
Old 05-25-2011, 02:58 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
SultanGris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 7,877
Received 366 Likes on 284 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kaborkian
Some light reading that supports exactly what I stated:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Food_vs._fuel

http://zfacts.com/p/63.html

http://www.slate.com/id/2122961/


Co-worker of mine's parents are also corn farmers. They are making a ton more money now selling fuel corn at increased sales prices over food corn and using the tax breaks (subsidies) to further pad profits.
Your first site is a wiki and not accurate. The corn used to make ethanol is actually turned into a higher quality feed after its been processed than it was without being processed, your second site says it costs .38cents more a gallon to produce than gas, not 10$, haha! It also says the ethanol blenders and and plant makers received the subsidies. Corn prices have went up yes, but its not just because of ethanol, same with food prices, there are worldwide disasters in austrailia, europe, south america, russia and even the united states that affect food prices. Anyone who thinks that ethanol is the major factor affecting food prices is a complete moron as it in reality has very little if any effect on food prices.
Old 05-25-2011, 02:59 PM
  #26  
Member
 
Remsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by sterlingone
Wow, do I wish we actually had a choice here NOT to buy E85. In Washington state, ALL of our gas --- everywhere, all the time -- is E85. When we did have a choice a few years ago, I'd get 31 to 32 mpg in our car and 26 with E85.
as to the subsidies........you also have to count the increased cost of the food at the grocery store when foods are converted to fuel. I've read articles that say that gallon of E85 fuel -- in real costs -- is worth 4 to 5 times in additional costs:
1. Government printing money and in debt to support the subsidies (plus the interest on the debt).
2. Every car in the US getting worse MPG on E85.
3. Increased cost at the grocery store.
4. The cost of all the lobbyists in D.C. to keep this ridiculous farce foisted on the American public.
5. PRICELESS!

Really? How do the non-e85 vehicles deal with the E85? I assume you meant that all of your gas has some ethanol mixed in, but I doubt it's all E85 (which is 85% ethanol)
Old 05-25-2011, 03:57 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
EricTheOracle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,773
Received 100 Likes on 74 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SultanGris
Your first site is a wiki and not accurate. The corn used to make ethanol is actually turned into a higher quality feed after its been processed than it was without being processed, your second site says it costs .38cents more a gallon to produce than gas, not 10$, haha! It also says the ethanol blenders and and plant makers received the subsidies. Corn prices have went up yes, but its not just because of ethanol, same with food prices, there are worldwide disasters in austrailia, europe, south america, russia and even the united states that affect food prices. Anyone who thinks that ethanol is the major factor affecting food prices is a complete moron as it in reality has very little if any effect on food prices.
Sultan, I understand that you make you living somehow in the ethanol industry.

At any-rate, according to our own Government Accountability Office, ethanol use increases the use of fossils fuels. Read about it.

That said, when a farmer stops growing wheat or soy in order to grow more profitable corn, what do you suppose happens to the price of wheat and soy according to the law of supply and demand?
Old 05-25-2011, 04:35 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
Rkcrawl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 134
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by EricTheOracle
At any-rate, according to our own Government Accountability Office, ethanol use increases the use of fossils fuels. Read about it.
I'm not in the industry, and not really a fan of ethanol for a bunch of reasons, your link is misleading. Actually the article title is mis-leading. All it points to is the government purchasing AFV capable vehicles, which are mostly E85 flex fuel vehicles and then they are requesting waviers to buy gasoline.

Has nothing to do with the production of ethanol and/or any effects it produces (negative or positve).

To the thread subject: Nice to see some real world comparisons. And good luck hoping for your thread to not be hijacked by the Ethanol/Gas debate...

Wrong link?
Old 05-25-2011, 04:50 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
SultanGris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 7,877
Received 366 Likes on 284 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by EricTheOracle
Sultan, I understand that you make you living somehow in the ethanol industry.

At any-rate, according to our own Government Accountability Office, ethanol use increases the use of fossils fuels. Read about it.

That said, when a farmer stops growing wheat or soy in order to grow more profitable corn, what do you suppose happens to the price of wheat and soy according to the law of supply and demand?
you understand wrong, I do farm, but not corn. Sure a few more corn acres for ethanol use make the prices of other commodities go up a little bit but the main reason they are so high right now is because of droughts in other parts of the world who typical produce lots of wheat resulting in catastrophic failures in many of the leading wheat producing areas, corn being used as ethanol in the usa plays a very small part in that increase. I have nothing to do with ethanol, I just like to correct peoples total ignorance on the subject, or really any subject for that matter. There is no argument that corn ethanol is efficient, its not, however it doesnt cost anywhere near 10$ a gallon to make it either. Subsidies are necessary steps to take in order to make ethanol more efficient for the future. Corn is not the answer to making ethanol but it is needed right now so they can get things rolling until they find another suitable source, like Brazil has with sugar cane. People always like to bitch and moan about something, electricity was subsidized heavily back when it was a new idea and the infrastructure was being put into place, look how that turned out. Farmers do get subsidies, always have long before ethanol was a factor and probably always will for various reasons, but they have nothing to do with the ethanol subsides, which are received by the ethanol blenders.

But anyway the purpose of this thread was to see at what pump price ethanol becomes a better choice than regular gas because whether they spend your tax money on ethanol or paying down the nation debt or buying 23,000$ hammers it doesnt really matter, you are still paying that tax so factoring it into your ethanol MPG cost makes no sense. Its all about cost to the consumer at the pump. Seems to be about 80 cents or so for most people. Ive read that a 20-25 percent blend actually gives better MPG than 10 or 85 percent but due to the lack of stations in my area I have not yet got to experiment with it to see what that percent blend gives me.
Old 05-25-2011, 05:14 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
BLU4TJW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Ontario
Posts: 502
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I can't believe you guys are doing this all over again. And I can't believe I keep reading it!


Quick Reply: Ethanol VS Gas MPG



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:29 PM.