Topic Sponsor
2009 - 2014 Ford F150 General discussion on 2009 - 2014 Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

ecoboost or 5L

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-18-2014, 08:23 PM
  #51  
Senior Member
 
Mitch101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Arizona
Posts: 143
Received 27 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by goocher1975
5.0 is a car motor
Hilarious............and true!
Mitch101 is offline  
Old 03-18-2014, 08:26 PM
  #52  
POWWWERRR!!!!!
 
dieselhunter44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,163
Received 167 Likes on 116 Posts

Default

We need to start shutting down these threads as soon as they start, regardless of the OP's intention (innocently asking or intentionally starting fights)
dieselhunter44 is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Speedmonkey (03-18-2014)
Old 03-18-2014, 08:33 PM
  #53  
Junior Member
 
goocher1975's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jeffs FRC
Some of you ecoboost mo's crack me up! You guys act like the 5.0 can't get out of its own way...lmao

OP, I drove both extensively before purchasing and ended up with the 5.0. First and foremost, I liked the way it drove better than the Eco. Second, was all the little issues that seem to come with the Eco. Now I know I will get bashed and the Eco swingers will say it's only a fraction of trucks with issues, but still, there seems to be many more issues with the Eco than the 5.0.

Also, if speed is your main goal I would still say go with the 5.0 hands down. Bolt-ons and either a blower or some spray and you'll decimate. Quite frankly, I think buying a truck with speed as a main priority is *** backwards, but whatever tickles your fancy. If I wanna go fast I'll jump in my 600hp Mustang...
Im not talking speed although the ecoboost is faster I'm talking power which is torque and the ecoboost has 420 vs 380. Not huge difference but the little 3.5 is working a lot easier than the V8 to get there. And since you have a 600hp mustang I'm sure you're well aware of how easy it is to make more power with a turbo than a naturally aspirated engine.
Afterall they do have turbos in powerstrokes, cummins and cats dont they?
goocher1975 is offline  
Old 03-18-2014, 08:33 PM
  #54  
Senior Member
 
Speedmonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Clarksville,tn
Posts: 153
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

I got the 5.0 because im a cheap bastard and it has plenty power to pull my boat..
Speedmonkey is offline  
The following users liked this post:
dieselhunter44 (03-18-2014)
Old 03-18-2014, 08:39 PM
  #55  
It's an ID10T error sir!
iTrader: (1)
 
SlimChaChi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Lake Hiawatha, NJ
Posts: 913
Received 97 Likes on 83 Posts

Default

Name:  Al Bundy.jpg
Views: 176
Size:  53.9 KB
SlimChaChi is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by SlimChaChi:
dieselhunter44 (03-18-2014), Speedmonkey (03-18-2014)
Old 03-18-2014, 08:40 PM
  #56  
Senior Member

 
SteveLord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Iowa
Posts: 5,193
Received 884 Likes on 672 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Azuri
A quick search can find that out. Interestingly enough his profile says he was online here today so he still lurks but doesn't post.
lol.....he probably to his computer every morning to see if anyone has mentioned him!
SteveLord is offline  
Old 03-18-2014, 08:43 PM
  #57  
Member
 
Jeffs FRC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 47
Received 20 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by goocher1975
Im not talking speed although the ecoboost is faster I'm talking power which is torque and the ecoboost has 420 vs 380. Not huge difference but the little 3.5 is working a lot easier than the V8 to get there. And since you have a 600hp mustang I'm sure you're well aware of how easy it is to make more power with a turbo than a naturally aspirated engine.
Afterall they do have turbos in powerstrokes, cummins and cats dont they?
Yep agree totally...without a power adder the 5.0 is gonna lose mod for mod vs an Eco. It's just the way some of the Eco guys come off on this site as smug little keyboard warriors. Would you agree that the 5.0 has a much higher HP ceiling than the Eco if one really wanted to push the envelope so to speak?

Btw, my Mustang has a supercharger. No ricer turbos on my car! Lol
Jeffs FRC is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by Jeffs FRC:
dieselhunter44 (03-18-2014), sullyman (03-18-2014)
Old 03-18-2014, 08:44 PM
  #58  
Beer Gut Extraordinaire

 
HCFX2013's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 17,369
Received 2,102 Likes on 1,317 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by goocher1975
My ecoboost has 420 ft/lbs of torque making it all truck all day everyday
Be that as it may, the Ecoboost originated in a car. So that immediately makes the context of your original argument invalid. The only motor in the lineup that originated in a truck is the 6.2L. Not trying to defend either one, I'm just here to get facts straight.
HCFX2013 is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by HCFX2013:
Chris's FX4 (03-18-2014), dieselhunter44 (03-18-2014)
Old 03-18-2014, 08:47 PM
  #59  
POWWWERRR!!!!!
 
dieselhunter44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,163
Received 167 Likes on 116 Posts

Default

Once the 2015 Mustang goes on sale with the Ecoboost, will it be fair to say it too is also a car engine?

Yes, I know it's a 4-banger and not the one used in trucks but the principle is the same.

I'll throw in a screwball, DONT BUY A HALF TON.

Buy a 3/4-1 ton diesel instead. No debating who is the real king of the hill in truck land
dieselhunter44 is offline  
Old 03-18-2014, 08:51 PM
  #60  
Member
 
motorcyclerider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Mcdonough,Ga
Posts: 36
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Jeffs FRC
Some of you ecoboost mo's crack me up! You guys act like the 5.0 can't get out of its own way...lmao

OP, I drove both extensively before purchasing and ended up with the 5.0. First and foremost, I liked the way it drove better than the Eco. Second, was all the little issues that seem to come with the Eco. Now I know I will get bashed and the Eco swingers will say it's only a fraction of trucks with issues, but still, there seems to be many more issues with the Eco than the 5.0.

Also, if speed is your main goal I would still say go with the 5.0 hands down. Bolt-ons and either a blower or some spray and you'll decimate. Quite frankly, I think buying a truck with speed as a main priority is *** backwards, but whatever tickles your fancy. If I wanna go fast I'll jump in my 600hp Mustang...
Originally Posted by goocher1975
Hahaha minivan motor thats cute
My sister had a 5.0 in her 1985 mustang gt, it was bad *** indeed...30 years ago!!
It's 2014 welcome to the future. Fords all-in on the ecoboost for a reason. The 5.0 was built for the MUSTANG not a truck, they just provide it so the rednecks can hear that V8 rumble. I can have over 400 hp and 500 ft/lbs for under $500 in upgrades. Try doing that with your car engine...


ECO and diesel is the future period like it or not. There isn't an endless supply of crude. The ECO can be made more powerful easier and for less $$ than the 5.0L. It has more power than the 5.0L and gets better/same gas mileage. The 5.0L is less complex which means less parts to fail down the road. The 5.0 has more than enough power for a half ton. When these trucks start becoming dinosaurs there will probably be more 5.0's on the road. Also no matter what others say the V8 is an American icon. Nothing sounds better. Just listen to the new F1 cars. Both engines are fantastic I would gladly have either one under the hood. The choice for me was made by price. If the dealer had a cheaper ECO I would be driving one.

Last edited by motorcyclerider; 03-18-2014 at 08:55 PM.
motorcyclerider is offline  


Quick Reply: ecoboost or 5L



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:22 PM.