Topic Sponsor
2009 - 2014 Ford F150 General discussion on 2009 - 2014 Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Dissapointed with payload capacity

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-17-2014, 04:24 PM
  #51  
Senior Member
 
Ford850's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,839
Received 374 Likes on 228 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by OMAC
I guess I need to get my priorities straight lol, my vehicle appearance has always superseded function hence the 22" wheels on my last wrk truck
And, hence your title to this thread.
The following users liked this post:
RES4CUE (02-17-2014)
Old 02-17-2014, 05:13 PM
  #52  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
OMAC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 543
Received 57 Likes on 43 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Ford850
And, hence your title to this thread.
touché my good sir
Old 02-17-2014, 05:23 PM
  #53  
Senior Member
 
Feathermerchant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Euless, Tx
Posts: 2,950
Received 398 Likes on 336 Posts

Default

Be careful with hauling and aftermarket wheels. Aftermarket wheels can be significantly heavier reducing performance (acceleration and braking). And also keep in mind that lower profile tires are more subject to damage and worsen the ride.
Old 02-17-2014, 06:18 PM
  #54  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
OMAC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 543
Received 57 Likes on 43 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Feathermerchant
Be careful with hauling and aftermarket wheels. Aftermarket wheels can be significantly heavier reducing performance (acceleration and braking). And also keep in mind that lower profile tires are more subject to damage and worsen the ride.
I got stock sizing this time, 275/65/18
Old 02-17-2014, 07:02 PM
  #55  
Senior Member
 
jonbar87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Around
Posts: 1,304
Received 133 Likes on 103 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by OMAC
[MENTION=3]Jon[/MENTION]bar that's awesome, your trucks lifted, what else have you done to handle the weight? You carrying heavy skids all the time or are u a weekend warrior lol
Nothing other than replacing the stock springs with the Skyjacker leaf springs. Nah I don't carry heavy loads that often, just help out friends for fun.
Old 02-17-2014, 07:10 PM
  #56  
Member
 
BigJoe913's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 58
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

so basically you're not disappointed with the truck.... you're disappointed you didn't do your research.... got it.
Old 02-17-2014, 08:27 PM
  #57  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
OMAC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 543
Received 57 Likes on 43 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BigJoe913
so basically you're not disappointed with the truck.... you're disappointed you didn't do your research.... got it.
Yes, it's advertised otherwise and I should have researched the specifics
Old 02-17-2014, 08:30 PM
  #58  
Senior Member
 
shazam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 194
Received 20 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Be grateful it's not a Raptor: 900 pound payload capacity.
Old 02-17-2014, 09:49 PM
  #59  
Member
 
DieselDennis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Brandon, MS
Posts: 89
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

This thread crossed my mind today as I was reading some blurb about the 2015 F150.

If they "save" 700 lbs of weight by making the body out of aluminum, will all the payloads increase by 700 lbs?

Make sense to me, but those manufacturers do funny things with weight numbers.
Old 02-17-2014, 10:09 PM
  #60  
Senior Member
 
Mike Up's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,076
Received 538 Likes on 398 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Madorski

The 350 back in '98 would have been making 255 HP and 330 Ft/Lbs. That torque number would be at about 2800 RPM. The eco makes its torque at 1900...
Pickuptrucks.com did some dyno tests with many many problems. They had to call in Ford because they could never get the rated torque at lower rpms.

Pickuptrucks.com found out that the Ecoboost doesn't make it's rated torque in 1st gear and doesn't make it in other gears unless loaded. Ford even said that the Ecoboost doesn't produce the rated torque in 1st gear.

That 5.7L was said to have 90% of it's torque down at 1000 rpms. So that would be 297 lbs of torque. Even at 20% loss for driveline loss, that's still 238 lbs of torque. Then add into the equation the power mods that he added, then how much lighter trucks were from that generation, and you have a truck that's excellent at hole shots!

Your not going to get the pull of a V8 unless you power brake the truck to load the engine and get the turbos spinning. Otherwise, you'll make power at much higher rpms like the 5.0L.

The conclusion was that the Ecoboost does produce it's rated torque, just not in the lower gears. The lower gears are where off the line power is going to come into play as the OP stated with his low rpm torque heavy 5.7L. This engine was known for it's exceptional low end torque as stated by numerous auto magazines.

Last edited by Mike Up; 02-17-2014 at 10:22 PM.
The following users liked this post:
OMAC (02-17-2014)


Quick Reply: Dissapointed with payload capacity



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:46 PM.