Topic Sponsor
2009 - 2014 Ford F150 General discussion on 2009 - 2014 Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Compiled information for Leveling Struts and Coilovers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-28-2012, 02:06 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Fx4_5.0Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Winchester, Va
Posts: 461
Received 40 Likes on 38 Posts

Default

and the triple tube kind of scares me away.
Old 11-28-2012, 03:00 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Kytann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 694
Received 92 Likes on 73 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Fx4_5.0Man
Ive been trying to get Rancho to give me their spring rate for these, but they wont seem to budge. I don't want to end up with a one size fits all spring, so I havn't bitten the bullet yet.

I do know they list two applications, 2wd and 4wd. 4wd is probably stiffer, but FORD has a ton of spring rates for these trucks.
Yeah I couldn't get the information either, except for them to tell me it was based on what sells the most.

Looks like you have the Supercrew 5.0? I'd guess it's based on the Supercab 5.0 weight. As that's probably the most sold configuration. It'll be a little soft for you, but not much, as the extra weight of the Crew is split between the front and back springs. Actually mostly on the back.

You do not have the 6.2 motor, which would be the heaviest configuration. But if I remember correctly others with the Supercrew 5.0 have reported less than 2" of lift, whereas the Supercab 5.0 guys generally have right at 2" of lift.

I figured with mine I would have more than 2" of lift, with my regular cab.
Old 11-28-2012, 03:20 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Kytann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 694
Received 92 Likes on 73 Posts

Default

You know, I never did type this out.

As far as spring rates, for 2012 Ford listed 11 different front spring part numbers. (as least as far as I remember)

Let's list all of the different available configurations and guesstimate where they would fit on the weight? I would be looking for help in
  • Spring 1
    • Regular Cab 6' Bed V6 3.7 2WD
    • Regular Cab 6' Bed V8 5.0 2WD
    • Regular Cab 8' Long Bed V6 3.7 2WD
    • Regular Cab 8' Long Bed V6 Eco 2WD
    • Regular Cab 8' Long Bed V8 5.0 2WD
  • Spring 2
    • Regular Cab 6 'Bed V6 3.7 4WD
    • Regular Cab 6' Bed V8 5.0 4WD
    • Regular Cab 8' Long Bed V6 3.7 4WD
    • Regular Cab 8' Long Bed V6 Eco 4WD
    • Regular Cab 8' Long Bed V8 5.0 4WD
  • Spring 3
    • SuperCab 6' Bed V6 3.7 2WD
    • SuperCab 6' Bed V6 Eco 2WD
    • SuperCab 6' Bed V8 5.0 2WD
  • Spring 4
    • SuperCab 6' Bed V8 6.2 2WD
    • SuperCab 6' Bed V6 3.7 4WD
    • SuperCab 6' Bed V6 Eco 4WD
    • SuperCab 6' Bed V8 5.0 4WD
  • Spring 5
    • SuperCab 6' Bed V8 6.2 4WD
    • SuperCrew 5' Bed V6 3.7 2WD
    • SuperCrew 5' Bed V6 Eco 2WD
    • SuperCrew 5' Bed V8 5.0 2WD
  • Spring 6
    • SuperCrew 5' Bed V8 6.2 2WD
    • SuperCrew 6' Bed V6 3.7 2WD
    • SuperCrew 6' Bed V6 Eco 2WD
    • SuperCrew 6' Bed V8 5.0 2WD
  • Spring 7
    • SuperCrew 6' Bed V8 6.2 2WD
    • SuperCrew 5' Bed V6 3.7 4WD
    • SuperCrew 5' Bed V6 Eco 4WD
    • SuperCrew 5' Bed V8 5.0 4WD
  • Spring 8
    • SuperCrew 5' Bed V8 6.2 4WD
    • SuperCrew 6' Bed V6 3.7 4WD
    • SuperCrew 6' Bed V6 Eco 4WD
    • SuperCrew 6' Bed V8 5.0 4WD
  • Spring 9
    • SuperCrew 6' Bed V8 6.2 4WD
  • Spring 10
    • SuperCab Raptor
  • Spring 11
    • SuperCrew Raptor


Just a rough guess. Does that look right to everyone?
Old 11-28-2012, 03:30 PM
  #34  
Senior Member
 
NOLAGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Lafayette, la
Posts: 1,002
Received 67 Likes on 48 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Kytann
Well when I made this list they were the only ones that were adjustable. At least in the lower price range.

However just by virtue of it's triple tube design it's going to be harsher and less controlled at the same time than a Mono-tube design. Look up some videos on youtube comparing a twin-tube to a mono-tube. Then imagine the triple tube design, and you'll see why some people hate them.

What the Rancho does have gong for it are an extreme ease of installation. It's already assembled with the spring, so you just unbolt your springpack and bolt these in. It can be a 2 hour job max in your driveway (provided you have the strength to turn the 200 ft-lb bottom bolts). And they are good enough for most people.

The Bilsteins I would recommend professional installation. If not the whole thing than at least the changing of the spring packs.

It seems like the Bilstein failures were really limited to using the highest setting (2.5") and off-roading. Even gentle off-roading. If you plan on using a lower setting and staying on-road you should be fine with the Bilsteins.

If I had to do it over again I'd do the Icon Coilovers. If I couldn't afford that, I'd go with the Rancho, even though they are not a mono-tube design. I want to like the Bilsteins, as I've used them in the past and loved them. Loved them way better than the Old Man Emu shocks, if you are familiar with those. But just too many failure rates on the Bilsteins.

As for whether they'll be stiff enough for you or not, none of us can answer that. We can say that others have found the soft setting too soft and the hard setting too stiff. So there does seem to be enough adjustment.
Originally Posted by Kytann
Also something to consider when we are discussing hard and soft shock settings. There is a distinct difference between high speed damping and low speed damping. Which has nothing to do with vehicle speed, but the speed the shock moves in and out.
Low speed is when the shock is moving slow, which is usually large movements. Like cresting a hill on the highway, controlling your cornering forces, things of that nature.
High speed damping is when the shock is moving fast. Like when you drive over expansion joints on the road. Harsh square edges that you drive over are the most extreme example of this.

Cheap twin tube shocks, or triple like the Ranchos typically have soft low speed damping and stiff high speed damping. The worst of them feel floaty and un controlled, while at the same time busy over the small stuff and harsh. This can rattle your teeth out on the dirt washboard roads, yet still have alot of body lean when cornering.

Well designed Mono-tube shocks like the Bilsteins, or especially the ones used by Icon, tend to have very stiff low speed damping. This makes them feel controlled at all times, like when towing, cornering, driving at high speed. Yet at the same time soft on the high-speed damping, so that all of the little business of say our dirt road example, just disapears underneath the truck.


If the Bilstiens were made more physically solid (so they didn't break), and sold in a kit form with the spring already attached, they would totally dominate the market.

Great info THANKS! I have a spring compressor and have changed springs and installed the 5100's before on a friends tacoma...but I probably wont install anything on my truck....no time nad have grown lazy lol. I am not sure what height I will need thats why i like the idea of the coil overs really. I want to be able to clear the rim and tire setup im looking at so im guessing 2-2.5". I also want the back a tad higher than the front and I want to cure wheel hop...its no fun with the supercharger. So where the 5100 might work for me...hearing about the braking worries me...I dont want to be limited or worried. I will have to look at youtube for the mono vs the twin tube but it doesnt sound good. and what im looking for as far as stiffness is like you said...controlled in corners and towing not the other way around. The rancho 4" life felt mushy...like a caddy...not what im after. I may look at the icon setup....sounds interesting.


EDIT I had actualy looked at the icons before...I forgot lol. I do like the sound of that front and back kit. Do you know if the back shocks and also add lift like the fox's say they can? And do you think they would help with wheel hop?

Last edited by NOLAGT; 11-28-2012 at 03:51 PM.
Old 11-28-2012, 03:55 PM
  #35  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Kytann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 694
Received 92 Likes on 73 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NOLAGT
Great info THANKS! I have a spring compressor and have changed springs and installed the 5100's before on a friends tacoma...but I probably wont install anything on my truck....no time nad have grown lazy lol. I am not sure what height I will need thats why i like the idea of the coil overs really. I want to be able to clear the rim and tire setup im looking at so im guessing 2-2.5". I also want the back a tad higher than the front and I want to cure wheel hop...its no fun with the supercharger. So where the 5100 might work for me...hearing about the braking worries me...I dont want to be limited or worried. I will have to look at youtube for the mono vs the twin tube but it doesnt sound good. and what im looking for as far as stiffness is like you said...controlled in corners and towing not the other way around. The rancho 4" life felt mushy...like a caddy...not what im after. I may look at the icon setup....sounds interesting.
Hey if you can afford the Coilovers they are definitely the way to go. I have not run accross one person who has regretted spending the cash to buy them.

As far as clearing big tires, you can clear more if you are willing to trim.

This is 1" of front lift. 0" in the back. 325/65R18
I did have to trim the metal on the back of the fenders. You can get away with trimming only plastic if you go higher or smaller on the tires, as I didn't have to trim much metal. Then I cold zinc primered it, painted it, then slathered epoxy over the edges. It should be sealed for winter at this point.
Attached Thumbnails Compiled information for Leveling Struts and Coilovers-dsc00425s.jpg  
The following users liked this post:
F150_Feste (12-16-2012)
Old 11-28-2012, 04:00 PM
  #36  
Senior Member
 
NOLAGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Lafayette, la
Posts: 1,002
Received 67 Likes on 48 Posts

Default

I dont mind spending the $ to make it how i want it. The rims im looking at are the BMF novakanes in a 20x9 and i think the only offset is 0 so they stick out a tad. Tires would be 305/55/20 nitto terra's.

Those are some beefy looking tires...looks good!
Old 12-02-2012, 09:55 AM
  #37  
Meek One
 
Mikemeek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 926
Received 104 Likes on 82 Posts

Default

I put the Rancho's loaded quick lift on my 2010 FX2 and there was a different part number for 4wds vs 2wds. I love them. I'm a bit sensitive to ride comfort and on the stiffer settings I can notice a bit harsher ride on bumpy roads, but the middle settings are comparable to stock ride, but handles better in the corners. I love them. I'm running 275/60/20's.
The following users liked this post:
F150_Feste (12-16-2012)



Quick Reply: Compiled information for Leveling Struts and Coilovers



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:48 PM.