Topic Sponsor
2009 - 2014 Ford F150 General discussion on 2009 - 2014 Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Catch can question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-05-2017, 01:27 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
NastyFFX4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,141
Received 310 Likes on 249 Posts

Default

Top Tier Fuels is the most important, IMO. I'm not saying not to do the catch can though.
Old 05-05-2017, 01:58 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
eddlestone213's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 233
Received 30 Likes on 27 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NastyFFX4
Top Tier Fuels is the most important, IMO. I'm not saying not to do the catch can though.
I've only run 93 octane from BP since I purchased the truck with 300 miles on it and its been great!
Old 05-05-2017, 02:05 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
dlbb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 862
Received 119 Likes on 110 Posts

Default

i have always run 91 oct since my first fill up. at 44500 or so miles now. i like the upr catch can. but not really getting if it is just a $400 preventive measure or if it is needed for long term reliability. any thoughts or clarification would be appreciated.
Old 05-05-2017, 03:02 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Blown F-150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 2,089
Received 487 Likes on 341 Posts
Default

Lot's of threads and heated debates on this topic. Basically, if you think it's a good idea, run it. If you don't like the idea, don't.

There are quite a few Eco's over 200k miles now that run just fine and never had a catch can.

I personally think they are a good idea and it doesn't hurt anything to run one as long as you empty it when needed. The Full-race version is a very nice piece.
The following users liked this post:
dlbb (05-05-2017)
Old 05-05-2017, 03:41 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
nerdh3rd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 1,024
Received 177 Likes on 132 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Blown F-150
Lot's of threads and heated debates on this topic. Basically, if you think it's a good idea, run it. If you don't like the idea, don't.

There are quite a few Eco's over 200k miles now that run just fine and never had a catch can.

I personally think they are a good idea and it doesn't hurt anything to run one as long as you empty it when needed. The Full-race version is a very nice piece.
I'll echo Blown F-150's statement. You will find debates for and against them. In the end there is no scientific evidence showing they are needed, and also no evidence saying they are bad to have, so it is up to personal opinion.

I run an RX Speedworks/McNally mega catch can on my Eco and am personally glad that the mix that comes out of it every few weeks isnt in my engine.
The following users liked this post:
RX Speed Works (09-02-2017)
Old 05-05-2017, 05:11 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
ajsturtz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Ames, Iowa
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 46 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by eddlestone213
I've only run 93 octane from BP since I purchased the truck with 300 miles on it and its been great!
As of today I've run 9184 gallons of fuel through my 2012 EB. If I ran all premium (in Iowa) I would have spent $2,938 more in less than 5 years!!

I've run 87/89 e-10 octane in my truck since it had 34 miles, it also has been great!
Old 05-10-2017, 03:38 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
eddlestone213's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 233
Received 30 Likes on 27 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ajsturtz
As of today I've run 9184 gallons of fuel through my 2012 EB. If I ran all premium (in Iowa) I would have spent $2,938 more in less than 5 years!!

I've run 87/89 e-10 octane in my truck since it had 34 miles, it also has been great!
Goodness! Premium gas is that much more expensive in Iowa than regular gas? I usually end up paying only a few cents more per gallon for 93 octane than I would if I was buying 87. Plus, I love the throttle response I get from 93 octane. I have a buddy with a 2013 ecoboost with every performance upgrade on his truck that I have on mine except he runs 87 and I can definitely tell a difference.
Old 05-11-2017, 09:17 AM
  #18  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
larryo108's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,225
Received 477 Likes on 271 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by eddlestone213
Goodness! Premium gas is that much more expensive in Iowa than regular gas? I usually end up paying only a few cents more per gallon for 93 octane than I would if I was buying 87. Plus, I love the throttle response I get from 93 octane. I have a buddy with a 2013 ecoboost with every performance upgrade on his truck that I have on mine except he runs 87 and I can definitely tell a difference.
In Pennsylvania, 93 is easily 30-40 cents more expensive than 87 per gallon. I run 93 as much as I can, but that's a big difference.
Old 05-12-2017, 03:48 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
eddlestone213's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 233
Received 30 Likes on 27 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by larryo108
In Pennsylvania, 93 is easily 30-40 cents more expensive than 87 per gallon. I run 93 as much as I can, but that's a big difference.
Wow, that is unfortunate! I guess its time for me to stop being a little girl about how expensive gas is and realize how expensive it could be.
Old 05-12-2017, 04:39 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
Blown F-150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 2,089
Received 487 Likes on 341 Posts
Default

Come up for a visit to Vancouver, BC. We pay $0.75 a gallon more for Premium...



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:03 AM.