Tonneau covers & MPG
#1
Tonneau covers & MPG
I was wondering how much do hardcover tonneau covers take a hit on the fuel economy for 2015+ models. for those of you who have hardcover tonneau covers, it'd be helpful if you could your experience with them. thank you
#2
I have a soft cover, and you asked about the hard ones, but I don’t think I’ve seen much of a change either way in mileage. I got mine because I like the look of a covered bed. I was ‘hoping’ it might help mpg a bit, but that didn’t happen....which is fine since my main concern was aesthetic.
The following users liked this post:
Breadelicious (01-13-2018)
#3
I have a soft cover, and you asked about the hard ones, but I don’t think I’ve seen much of a change either way in mileage. I got mine because I like the look of a covered bed. I was ‘hoping’ it might help mpg a bit, but that didn’t happen....which is fine since my main concern was aesthetic.
#4
Gone Golfin
iTrader: (3)
In a couple of threads that have discussed this the consensus was that they don't seem to make a difference either way.
The following users liked this post:
Breadelicious (01-13-2018)
#5
Hold my beer
https://www.f150forum.com/f2/tonneau...mileage-20851/
An older thread, but may be of some interest.
I have a soft (Truxedo LoPro) and have had one on my other trucks and found no difference in MPG. I would almost wonder if the weight of fiberglass hard covers would hinder your MPG (however minute) with the extra pounds? I also agree that on average, there isn't a difference in cover vs no cover. Generally speaking, I actually prefer the look of painted-to-match fiberglass covers, but they aren't practical for my lifestyle. A lot of people seem to really like those folding hard covers, but I just don't like how they block your back window if you had to fold it up. On the other hand, with soft covers, they are either rolled up or down...there is no in between. You definitely have your options with covers these days.
An older thread, but may be of some interest.
I have a soft (Truxedo LoPro) and have had one on my other trucks and found no difference in MPG. I would almost wonder if the weight of fiberglass hard covers would hinder your MPG (however minute) with the extra pounds? I also agree that on average, there isn't a difference in cover vs no cover. Generally speaking, I actually prefer the look of painted-to-match fiberglass covers, but they aren't practical for my lifestyle. A lot of people seem to really like those folding hard covers, but I just don't like how they block your back window if you had to fold it up. On the other hand, with soft covers, they are either rolled up or down...there is no in between. You definitely have your options with covers these days.
#6
Senior Member
In theory a cover makes the truck more aerodynamic and improves fuel mileage. Adding a cap does the same thing, but the added weight seems too offset the aerodynamics. In reality the difference is so small that it I've never been able to measure it. I've been driving trucks for 40 years with and without them. I've never noted any difference.
#7
Member
In regards to your question, are you looking at a one-piece cover, or a hard folding cover? As marshallr mentioned above, a cover will technically make the truck more aerodynamic and improve fuel mileage. It has been said for many year "you MAY see up to 10% increase in fuel when adding a tonneau cover", however as he also said, it's usually a very minimal difference. If you're looking at one-piece hard covers, the weight typically ranges from 75 lbs - 200lbs depending on the material it's made from.... ABS, Fiberglass, Aluminum, ect. I would more so focus on what you use the truck for and what you're trying to accomplish with the cover.
Trending Topics
#8
I now have a soft Truxedo Lo Pro QT and from limited highway speed (70-75 mph) data, I'm not seeing a measurable difference between mpg I was gettting before it was installed (about ~2k highway miles of data) and after (about ~8k miles of data). But it's not a truly fair comparison because I also removed the front air dam just after I started using the tonneau, so slight + of tonneau offset by slight - of no air dam.
I am a firm believer that in many cases a tonneau will increase your mpg by 1-2 mpg or more. I base this on a 2009 F150 RCSB with 4.6L I had with an Undercover hard shell tonneau. I drove the same I-10 route (~800 miles R/T) monthly over a number of years, probably ~10k miles of data without tonneau and ~30k or more miles with tonneau, and I regularly got 1 to 1.5 mpg better with the tonneau.
Similar experience with a 2012 F250 RCLB with 6.2L gasser I had but with a Lo Pro QT; the improvement in that instance was generally around 0.5 to 1.0 mpg.
The amount of weight in the bed (affecting the back-to-front 'profile' of the truck) also seems to play a part. In my F150 and F250 there was a 'sweet spot' around 400-500 lbs that consistently gave me the best mpg increase.
I am a firm believer that in many cases a tonneau will increase your mpg by 1-2 mpg or more. I base this on a 2009 F150 RCSB with 4.6L I had with an Undercover hard shell tonneau. I drove the same I-10 route (~800 miles R/T) monthly over a number of years, probably ~10k miles of data without tonneau and ~30k or more miles with tonneau, and I regularly got 1 to 1.5 mpg better with the tonneau.
Similar experience with a 2012 F250 RCLB with 6.2L gasser I had but with a Lo Pro QT; the improvement in that instance was generally around 0.5 to 1.0 mpg.
The amount of weight in the bed (affecting the back-to-front 'profile' of the truck) also seems to play a part. In my F150 and F250 there was a 'sweet spot' around 400-500 lbs that consistently gave me the best mpg increase.
#9
My 2019 measures fuel mileage live at 1/10 mile resolution.
It appears to me you actually lose 1 mile per gallon.
I’ll test it more on long trip.
Years ago Myth Buster TV did a deal on tail gate up or down. Tailgate down reduced mileage.
I can’t remember if they did cover at same time.
I think this thread needs update from people with newer trucks that measure fuel mileage.
My 2016 and 2019 measured fuel mileage.
anyone else like to add?
rob
It appears to me you actually lose 1 mile per gallon.
I’ll test it more on long trip.
Years ago Myth Buster TV did a deal on tail gate up or down. Tailgate down reduced mileage.
I can’t remember if they did cover at same time.
I think this thread needs update from people with newer trucks that measure fuel mileage.
My 2016 and 2019 measured fuel mileage.
anyone else like to add?
rob
#10
Senior Member
Very good video that explains tonneau's too.
The following 2 users liked this post by SPOAT:
13XLTEco (07-22-2019),
BleedinFordblue (10-01-2019)