Topic Sponsor
General F150 Discussion General Ford F150 truck discussions and questions
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

3.7 litre ecoboost is the best engine for 2011?love it or hate it?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-29-2010, 08:04 AM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
CrashTECH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 1,212
Received 30 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by f150cwcw
I think its a great engine for the person who just wants a truck or needs to haul around a four wheeler but i woudnt recommend it for someone who is going to tow.
Really? Why not? I wouldn't even question using it to tow with. Especially if I wanted to put a little cash into it and a good tune. I am willing to bet that it would be quite a bit better than the 5.0 or 6.2 for towing.
Old 09-29-2010, 08:14 AM
  #22  
Member
 
VanoFord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: The Woodlands, Tx
Posts: 1,814
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by f150cwcw
Acutally no, its not a 6.6L. Chevy makes a 6.2L that puts out 403hp and 417ft-bls. But Ford is coming out with a 6.2L for the F150 thats going to push out 411hp and 434ft-lbs.
Pardon me for not knowing Chevy's exact engine line-up (as if I gave a rat's *** about them honestly) lol.
Old 09-29-2010, 08:20 AM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
JCP281's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 661
Received 25 Likes on 19 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by f150cwcw
I think its a great engine for the person who just wants a truck or needs to haul around a four wheeler but i woudnt recommend it for someone who is going to tow.
Why would it be any different? The Eco-Boost has a far better powerband and gobs more torque than the current 5.4L that everyone raves about for towing.

Just because its a V6 does not mean its at a disadvantage. In the game of engines, a turbo changes everything.

Behold:
http://www.texasracers.com/vb/showthread.php?t=29727

420Ftlb of torque at 2500 RPM.

So, you were saying?
Old 09-29-2010, 08:27 AM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
JimFX4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,030
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bajaman
Still doesn't equal the GMC's 403 hp.....

The pproblem is, as someone stated in another thread, you have to buy thr rest of the truck too. I used to drive Chevy and Pontiac. It was no fun getting all new brakes, drums, and rotors at 16,000 miles. I traded my 03 Explorer w/ 58,000 miles and it still had original brake parts.
Old 09-29-2010, 01:57 PM
  #25  
Rok
Member
 
Rok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: SoFlo
Posts: 1,927
Received 142 Likes on 98 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JwS 4.6
yes it is a 3.7L twin turbo ecoboost engine similar to the one on the taurus SHO that makes the 365 hp. the regular 3.7 is making 305.. still impressive honestly
Dude get your facts right! The 3.5L is the twin turbo. The 3.7L is the base V6 engine. Two totally different engines!
Old 10-02-2010, 04:59 PM
  #26  
Junior Member
 
hossola's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It is a 3.5 and it should not dissapoint the average user. It tows 11K lbs and gets 20 MPG. NOT BAD. I was watching the torture test that they are doing to the engine.

Pretty F'in impressive engine. I am eager to see how it does hauling timber and running the baja 1000. We'll see if it still comes out on top.
Old 10-02-2010, 05:01 PM
  #27  
Junior Member
 
hossola's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hossola
It is a 3.5 and it should not dissapoint the average user. It tows 11K lbs and gets 20 MPG. NOT BAD. I was watching the torture test that they are doing to the engine.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J-fCzBHVFTY

Pretty F'in impressive engine. I am eager to see how it does hauling timber and running the baja 1000. We'll see if it still comes out on top.
I FOR ONE, would much rather pick up the returning legend... THE Five-0
Old 10-02-2010, 10:10 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
CrashTECH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 1,212
Received 30 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by hossola
I FOR ONE, would much rather pick up the returning legend... THE Five-0
Perhaps... but that is a preference as you stated. Doesn't mean it is better which implies the EB can't do the job.
Old 10-03-2010, 09:36 AM
  #29  
in the house

 
bajaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Kansas
Posts: 4,493
Received 1,349 Likes on 780 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JimFX4
The pproblem is, as someone stated in another thread, you have to buy thr rest of the truck too. I used to drive Chevy and Pontiac. It was no fun getting all new brakes, drums, and rotors at 16,000 miles. I traded my 03 Explorer w/ 58,000 miles and it still had original brake parts.

Oh, believe me....I think Ford's quality is far superior, which is why I just bought a new FX4 after careful consideration (LONG time die-hard Chevy fan here). I was just stirring the pot a bit on the whole "but THIS engine has more power!" issue.....lol!
Old 10-03-2010, 09:49 AM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
JimFX4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,030
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

I just question the durability of this engine. You are asking a six cylinder to do the work of an eight. I'm curious to see how these engines stand up a year or two later. I hope that I am surprised!


Quick Reply: 3.7 litre ecoboost is the best engine for 2011?love it or hate it?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:42 PM.