Topic Sponsor
2021+ Ford F150 Discussion of the 14th generation F150.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Real Truck

Hybrid Option--One Engine?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 25, 2020 | 04:24 PM
  #1  
FL850's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 250
Likes: 135
From: Pensacola, Florida
Default Hybrid Option--One Engine?

I just posted about this in another thread, and wanted to create a standalone one for discussion/answers.

Since Ford unveiled the 14th Gen, ive been curious--why did they offer the hybrid option with only one engine? I know that most vehicle models only have one hybrid option, but the F150 has four gasoline options and a diesel to choose from. For CAFE purposes, a 2.7 hybrid would make a lot of sense.

It seems reasonable to conclude that if Ford keeps so many engine choices around after the next mid cycle refresh, the hybrid system would make it to more than one powertrain. Would love to hear any information towards this, thoughts, and outright speculation.

Last edited by FL850; Nov 25, 2020 at 04:38 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2020 | 04:33 PM
  #2  
Pioneer74's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 5,448
Likes: 3,332
From: Dearborn, Mi
Default

I would have loved if the Hybrid was available with the 2.7. I love that engine and I don't necessarily need the power of the 3.5, but the tech of the Hybrid really has me wanting it.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2020 | 04:34 PM
  #3  
Ricktwuhk's Avatar
Senior Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 10
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 14,975
Likes: 6,035
From: SE Michigan
Default

Hybrid is not "added" to a powertrain. It's a totally different engine configuration.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2020 | 04:40 PM
  #4  
Pioneer74's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 5,448
Likes: 3,332
From: Dearborn, Mi
Default

Originally Posted by Ricktwuhk
Hybrid is not "added" to a powertrain. It's a totally different engine configuration.
Most Hybrid powertrains use an engine that utilizes an Atkinson cycle. In Ford's instance, they use a normal 3.5TT engine mated to a transmission that has an electric motor in it.

Theoretically, Ford could bolt any engine up to the hybrid transmission and it will work.

Last edited by Pioneer74; Nov 25, 2020 at 04:44 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2020 | 05:50 PM
  #5  
All Hat No Cattle's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,337
Likes: 1,001
From: Lost Wages
Default

Theoretically, Ford could bolt any engine up to the hybrid transmission and it will work.
Yes. 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025. Why not?
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2020 | 02:17 PM
  #6  
FL850's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 250
Likes: 135
From: Pensacola, Florida
Default

Been really busy and couldnt get back to this as soon as I wanted.

If the hybrid is a completely separate engine, yet Ford's particular hybrid setup is almost "plug and play," additional hybrid options at the next mid cycle refresh would make it easy for Ford to tout "new" engines, with most of the R/D having been completed and tested via the 3.5 PB.

Making that leap would take Ford one step closer to having an all hybrid/electric F150 lineup. A hybrid 2.7 would be a boon to people using their trucks primarily in urban environments.

Very curious to watch the progress and success of the 3.5 PB over the next couple of years. If proven to be reliant and match real world efficiency with it's on paper numbers, Ford will be that much further ahead of its rivals yet again.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2020 | 04:07 PM
  #7  
Bamaman's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 707
Likes: 270
From: Huntsville, AL area
Default

It's ridiculous that the F150's have the 3.3, 2.7, 3.5, 5.0 and 3.0 diesel and now the 3.5 hybrid engines. The demand of the retail market is brutal. And don't forget that they have the 6.2 and 7.3 Godzilla engines in the 3/4 ton and 1 ton trucks--in addition to the 6.7 diesels. And a new 6.8 gas V-8 engine's going to come out of the Windsor engine factory a year from now. That's a lot of engineering.

Right now, Ford's in the midst of having to re-design their product lines to have fully electric powertrains. Trucks now require two completely different chassis'. And they're having to design and build the factory and the machinery to build full electric cars and trucks. All of this is extremely expensive--while trying to maintain the status quo of the current powerplants.

After all, there's just enough money to go around.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2020 | 04:24 PM
  #8  
Pioneer74's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 5,448
Likes: 3,332
From: Dearborn, Mi
Default

Originally Posted by Bamaman
After all, there's just enough money to go around.
That's why Ford just bought out about 1400 salaried employees and let go of a lot of contract workers.

I wouldn't expect anything to be announced officially, but Ford is going to follow GM. GM has already stated that they aren't investing any more money to develop internal combustion drivetrains. Europe and California are talking about banning ICE vehicles starting in about 10 years, and if the next administration gets their way, America will follow. Lack of infrastructure be dammed.

Reply
Old Dec 5, 2020 | 07:17 PM
  #9  
FL850's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 250
Likes: 135
From: Pensacola, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by Bamaman
It's ridiculous that the F150's have the 3.3, 2.7, 3.5, 5.0 and 3.0 diesel and now the 3.5 hybrid engines. The demand of the retail market is brutal. And don't forget that they have the 6.2 and 7.3 Godzilla engines in the 3/4 ton and 1 ton trucks--in addition to the 6.7 diesels.
The F150 engine lineup baffles me as well. I realize that Ford sells 900K of them per year, so if the 3.3 and 3.0 are only 5% of sales each, that's still a total of 90K trucks. But if Ford stopped offering those two engines, particularly the 3.3, how many sales would they lose to other brands?

With the new 7.3 gas engine in the Super Duty, no reason to keep the 6.2 around either. As long as the Mustang offers a V8, the same engine will have to be available in the F150, which makes a sharing of the 6.2 between the F150 and SD impractical.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2020 | 04:37 PM
  #10  
Matt_E_Salesman's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 264
Likes: 223
From: New Brunswick, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by FL850
The F150 engine lineup baffles me as well. I realize that Ford sells 900K of them per year, so if the 3.3 and 3.0 are only 5% of sales each, that's still a total of 90K trucks. But if Ford stopped offering those two engines, particularly the 3.3, how many sales would they lose to other brands?

With the new 7.3 gas engine in the Super Duty, no reason to keep the 6.2 around either. As long as the Mustang offers a V8, the same engine will have to be available in the F150, which makes a sharing of the 6.2 between the F150 and SD impractical.
The 2.7 is better than the 3.3 in every conceivable measure. However, the 3.3 needs to stay for fleet sales and the "I don't want one o' them there turbo doohickeys mah truck!" types that also don't want to spend the $$$ on a 5.0.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:47 PM.