Topic Sponsor
2021+ Ford F150 Discussion of the 14th generation F150.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Considering a new Lariat - Engine choice for reliability quest

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-04-2024, 12:19 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
bballr4567's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Evansville, IN
Posts: 724
Received 286 Likes on 204 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ks54703
2.7EB is only available in XL and XLT for 24.

5.0 is base engine, 3.5EB and 3.5EB power boosts are optional.

You will have 6 people for the 5.0, and the other split between the 3.5EB and 3.5EB power boost.

Go 5.0 and use the option money on any needed options.

Ford has a totally different way for cylinder deactivation.

Today if buying after having (2)(18&19) 3.5EB's a 21 3.5EB power boost and now a 2.7EB would go 5.0 and 3.73 gearing.

Cylinder deactivation gets one down to a 2.5L while grocery getting then 5.0 is also made to run on the hyway.
5.0 to 3.5EB on a Lariat is only a $90 difference on 24s.

OP, you might be able to find a 23 with the 2.7 if you look around if that's what you truly think you'll be happy with. My quick search found a few. Worth a shot! Plus, it'll be decently cheaper as well!
The following 3 users liked this post by bballr4567:
Joe Friday (04-11-2024), rgm1266 (04-05-2024), ToomanyFTs (04-04-2024)
Old 04-04-2024, 12:25 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
ToomanyFTs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2022
Location: Boulder City, NV
Posts: 315
Received 111 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

I agree with you, as much as I like the 2015-2020, the new models are nice and the interiors seem much better
but your going to have all digital dash in a Lariat I believe
The following users liked this post:
Joe Friday (04-11-2024)
Old 04-04-2024, 01:01 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
RubyRed Canadian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 669
Received 226 Likes on 153 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stu Cazzo
Well...I too have a 2018 Lariat with all the options...and a 5.0.
I would never replace it with a '24 ...simply because I believe my 2018 is superior to these new model years.
What do we get for all that extra money? really?

What is the rationale behind you wanting to replace it with a newer year?
Unless maybe you have a bunch of extra $$$ to burn?
I mean even so...if your motor needed replacing...you'd still be way ahead with your 2018.

One guy's opinion...
The seats alone in the new trucks are a reason to upgrade. My 2016(XLT 302a) and 2019(Lariat 502a) seats were not great. My 2021(XLT 302a) seats are far better than previous generations.

The 3.5L is a solid engine. I had the 3.5L in each truck. I didn't have timing chain issues, but I did have the cam phasers replaced on the 2019.

I tow A LOT, so for me the choice was a no brainer, if you don't tow, then the decision becomes harder.
The following 3 users liked this post by RubyRed Canadian:
Joe Friday (04-11-2024), Mark Miller (04-04-2024), ToomanyFTs (04-04-2024)
Old 04-04-2024, 01:15 PM
  #14  
Junior Member
 
sno1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Posts: 27
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

I started shopping knowing that I wanted the V8. Now I would try the 3.5 turbo. They seem to have ironed out any issues with the 3.5 and the horsepower and torque numbers are impressive. I personally am against cylinder deactivation and that's what killed the V8 choice for me. They always deactivate the same 4 cylinders and I don't believe that's going to be good long term. There are some reports of failures starting to show up. I don't believe there is any real world advantage, just a game with the EPA to look "cleaner" in a mythical test chamber.
The following 3 users liked this post by sno1:
Joe Friday (04-13-2024), Mark Miller (04-04-2024), ToomanyFTs (04-04-2024)
Old 04-04-2024, 01:46 PM
  #15  
Keyser Soze
 
diambo4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,325
Received 892 Likes on 483 Posts
Default

I follow the 14th gen 5.0 pretty religiously and there has been only ONE documented failure of cyl deactivation that I have seen and that's with an * because it wasn't really proven with true RC that that was the actual cause of the failure. Lots of these trucks making 1000HP with not a single failure of cylinder deactivation. We are in year #4. We need to put these BS cylinder deactivation fear mongering to rest. It's a solid engine!
The following 3 users liked this post by diambo4life:
D SPY V (04-26-2024), fatty 239 (04-06-2024), Joe Friday (04-11-2024)
Old 04-04-2024, 02:08 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Scott in PA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Beaver Falls, PA
Posts: 297
Received 184 Likes on 109 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sno1
I started shopping knowing that I wanted the V8. I personally am against cylinder deactivation and that's what killed the V8 choice for me. They always deactivate the same 4 cylinders and I don't believe that's going to be good long term. There are some reports of failures starting to show up. .
My 2015 GMC Sierra V8 had cylinder deactivation and it performed flawlessly for over 140,000 miles.
The following 2 users liked this post by Scott in PA:
fatty 239 (04-06-2024), Joe Friday (04-11-2024)
Old 04-04-2024, 02:49 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Brocar's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 327
Received 142 Likes on 90 Posts
Default

I had a 2020 5.0 and now have a 2022 3.5 ecoboost and I would go with the 3.5.There is nothing wrong with the 5.0 it is a great engine.I tow a travel trailer though although it is not really heavy about 5500 lbs the 3.5 is better with the twin turbos.I towed the same trailer with the 5.0 and they both got about the same mileage when towing it because the 5.0 has to rev to get it moving and the 3.5 dumps more fuel when in boost.The 5.0 does sound really nice though when you lay into it.I do like both engines but when no trailer hooked up the 3.5 hauls ***.
The following 6 users liked this post by Brocar:
Fordstream (04-05-2024), Joe Friday (04-11-2024), Mark Miller (04-04-2024), rjinaz (04-04-2024), tidefan1967 (04-05-2024), ToomanyFTs (04-04-2024) and 1 others liked this post. (Show less...)
Old 04-04-2024, 10:01 PM
  #18  
Junior Member
 
SEMO F150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 6
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post

Default

I had a 2017, a 2018, and a 2020 with the 5.0. My 2023 has the 3.5 ecoboost. The 3.5 drives much better on the highway and seldom downshifts going uphill. It gets better fuel mileage than the 5.0's and is vastly superior towing a trailer. I was satisfied with the 5.0's but I would not go back to one after having the 3.5.
The following 4 users liked this post by SEMO F150:
Joe Friday (04-11-2024), Mark Miller (04-04-2024), tidefan1967 (04-05-2024), ToomanyFTs (04-04-2024)
Old 04-04-2024, 10:43 PM
  #19  
Member
 
sniper307's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

I have a 2022 f150 with the 5.0. 15k miles and not a drop of oil consumption . I previously drove a 2018 f150 with the 5.0 and had oil consumption issues. Mine was not drastic, but it did use about a quart every 4k. Had the TSB done and it improved, but was still present. I feel that this new engine is better in all ways than the 2018, doesn't use oil, feels more powerful and smooth, and definitely is quieter. I would have no issues choosing it again.
The following 2 users liked this post by sniper307:
JimW-FL-Lariat (04-04-2024), Joe Friday (04-11-2024)
Old 04-04-2024, 11:48 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
ToomanyFTs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2022
Location: Boulder City, NV
Posts: 315
Received 111 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SEMO F150
I had a 2017, a 2018, and a 2020 with the 5.0. My 2023 has the 3.5 ecoboost. The 3.5 drives much better on the highway and seldom downshifts going uphill. It gets better fuel mileage than the 5.0's and is vastly superior towing a trailer. I was satisfied with the 5.0's but I would not go back to one after having the 3.5.
I had a 2016 F150 Platinum 6.5 bed 3.5eb and pulled a 10k lb 5th wheel w/ no problem , pulled as good as my new f250 7.3 gas super D.
I can imagine how the new and improved 3.5 would do pulling the same. Tons of torque at low RPM
The following users liked this post:
Mark Miller (04-04-2024)


Quick Reply: Considering a new Lariat - Engine choice for reliability quest



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:44 AM.