Topic Sponsor
Performance, Tuning, and (LEGAL) Racing Post discussions about increasing performance, capabilities, and racing. ****WARNING**** Street racing or illegal activities will be removed and potential bans will be handed out.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

3.5 Downpipe gains

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-14-2019, 11:22 AM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
MagneticBoost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default 3.5 Downpipe gains

I have been unable to find before and after dyno numbers for a downpipe (catted or noncatted). Everything I find is the gains from stock to tuned and downpipe. Anyone have graphs of actual gains? I have seen numbers stating 20 whp, but I dont know if I believe the manufacturer’s claims.
The following users liked this post:
jrobertkenner (07-16-2021)
Old 02-14-2019, 01:26 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
02reaper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 806
Received 111 Likes on 77 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MagneticBoost
I have been unable to find before and after dyno numbers for a downpipe (catted or noncatted). Everything I find is the gains from stock to tuned and downpipe. Anyone have graphs of actual gains? I have seen numbers stating 20 whp, but I dont know if I believe the manufacturer’s claims.
Ecoboost engines are torque based and limit based. You wont see any gains from installing a catted or non catted downpipe. Gains from a tune would be the same, just gains from the tune itself and not necessarily the downpipe. The only gain you will or should really see is faster turbo spool.
Old 02-14-2019, 02:23 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
w00t692's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 2,229
Received 612 Likes on 439 Posts
Default

Downpipe WITH exhaust commanding the same torque my turbo speed to make that torque dropped by 20-30000 rpms on the turbocharger.

So technically it would allow me to command more torque and make more power at this point, but it did not add any power.
Old 02-14-2019, 02:49 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
02reaper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 806
Received 111 Likes on 77 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by w00t692
Downpipe WITH exhaust commanding the same torque my turbo speed to make that torque dropped by 20-30000 rpms on the turbocharger.

So technically it would allow me to command more torque and make more power at this point, but it did not add any power.
There was a brief discussion of this over here.... https://www.f150ecoboost.net/forum/1...-50rwhp-4.html
Old 02-14-2019, 03:26 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
w00t692's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 2,229
Received 612 Likes on 439 Posts
Default

Yes, this is also the goal of clipping the exducer wheel to increase flow and reduce exhaust pressure attempting to exit past it.
Old 02-15-2019, 07:13 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
02reaper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 806
Received 111 Likes on 77 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by w00t692
Downpipe WITH exhaust commanding the same torque my turbo speed to make that torque dropped by 20-30000 rpms on the turbocharger.

So technically it would allow me to command more torque and make more power at this point, but it did not add any power.
Looking at the stock downpipe and catalytic converters on my 2016 3.5, unless the cats are really restrictive, I don't see that as the real bottleneck in the exhaust system. To me the bottleneck is the 2.5" section from the Y to the muffler.
Old 02-15-2019, 09:09 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
w00t692's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 2,229
Received 612 Likes on 439 Posts
Default

Um, the exhaust is only 2.5" until the muffler where it goes out the back of the muffler at 3" So yeah... the entire midpipe section and resonator and everything else is a bottleneck.
Old 02-15-2019, 09:32 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
02reaper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 806
Received 111 Likes on 77 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by w00t692
Um, the exhaust is only 2.5" until the muffler where it goes out the back of the muffler at 3" So yeah... the entire midpipe section and resonator and everything else is a bottleneck.
That was something in the discussion over on the other site too, where all the aftermarket downpipes are 2.5" also at the turbo adapter but neck up to 3" the rest of the way, then back to 2.5" till right there at the muffler where it expands to 2.75".
Old 02-15-2019, 09:34 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
w00t692's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 2,229
Received 612 Likes on 439 Posts
Default

It's OD. I didnt' drop much turbo speed until i did that exhaust. It really is a bottleneck at least on a gen2 motor.

gen1's just don't make the same power the gen2's do.
Old 02-15-2019, 09:43 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
02reaper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 806
Received 111 Likes on 77 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by w00t692
It's OD. I didnt' drop much turbo speed until i did that exhaust. It really is a bottleneck at least on a gen2 motor.

gen1's just don't make the same power the gen2's do.
Right, The 2.5"/2.75" part of the catback exhaust itself is where I think the most gain would be. I've been on the fence about doing the downpipe and atleast getting the 2.5"/2.75" section out and putting 3" on mine. I'm just not sure if the stock cats are really that restrictive or not. My intention is to keep the truck as quiet as possible because in my opinion the best sounding v6 is a quiet one. lol...I will say I did not notice a bit of difference when I installed the turbo adapters on mine. Of course that goes back to the truck being torque and limit based, and that's how I tune also instead of just going in and maxing and defeating all limiters I have seen others do.


Quick Reply: 3.5 Downpipe gains



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:20 AM.