Topic Sponsor
2015 - 2020 Ford F150 General discussion on the 13th generation Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

WTF Ford!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-25-2017, 05:22 PM
  #41  
Senior Member
 
acdii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 13,828
Received 2,719 Likes on 2,056 Posts

Default

Boo!

Seeing if page 5 actually comes up instead of 4 repeating.


yep, it did, guess there was a ghost post.
Old 10-25-2017, 05:55 PM
  #42  
Senior Member
 
adammjarvis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 317
Received 38 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by acdii
I have had HID's in several vehicles, and none of them lit the road when wet in the dark as well as the LED's do. HID have more blue in them, which washes out in wet weather. I was even able to see the corn in the field which was cut back two cutter heads deep. As I said, these are the best lights I have ever had on any vehicle, including the Lincoln with the adaptive HID.
You're failing to realize it's not the source of the light (halogen, HID, soy candle or LED). It's the kelvin and the optics.

There is a fine balance between being able to see at night and being able to see at night with a light source. I highly suggest you read up on it, if you're truly interested.

Just because something appears brighter to you doesn't mean it truly is one way or another. In the case of headlights, a lot of people focus on the short term not long term (short distance vs long distance). If you can only see 150' in front of you and you're doing 70mph - how quick will you travel 150'? Much faster than you can register!

However even with all my knowledge I ran HIDs in my fusion using a quality HID projector and 5000k bulbs running at 55w (compared to industry standard of 35w). Tho my setup was tuned to compensate for the distance, I still didn't go the optimal route but with my knowledge I was able to determine the pros an cons/benefits of the setup. I wouldn't have ran that setup at 35w, to say the least.

It's awesome stuff that a lot of people don't know about. We all have different motivations. Just gotta be open minded.
Old 10-25-2017, 09:04 PM
  #43  
Senior Member
 
nlitend1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Vernon, BC
Posts: 1,182
Received 147 Likes on 108 Posts

Default

They should offer led with out the outline lights on the lower levels. 502 and above can have both and still maintain the exclusivity.
Old 10-25-2017, 09:27 PM
  #44  
Senior Member
 
BigDozer66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Lufkin, Texas USA
Posts: 571
Received 88 Likes on 74 Posts
Cool

Originally Posted by acdii
Boo!

Seeing if page 5 actually comes up instead of 4 repeating.


yep, it did, guess there was a ghost post.
Page 4? 5?

Man we aren't even to the bottom of the first page yet!

Well I'm not anyway.
Old 10-25-2017, 10:31 PM
  #45  
Junior Member
 
PeteyPete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 10
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by adammjarvis
My truck was $54k and didn't come with leather seats!!!

I seriously almost did not buy my vehicle because it lacks leather seats. I could have gotten a Ford Explorer SPORT for cheaper..tho lack the bed space and towing options.

Either way.. I think overall just the cost of pickups these days is about $10k higher than where it should be.

I wonder what it'd be like if we didn't have dealerships. Or.. dealerships that were extensions of the manufactures. Set pricing. No negotiations. No rebates (other than stock that sits >60 days) and so on.

There is usually 3-8k in "rebates" off the top. THEN you have negotiated prices off the purchase off the sticker.

What if sales folk got paid a base pay, no pressure sale and the price of the vehicle was just that.
I agree. Ford did a great job with the ride, engine, and transmission, but there are some things I don't understand. There is no reason why my $52k MSRP'ed truck doesn't have leather, LED lights, and push button start. I almost bought the GMC because the Ford lacked those options.
Old 10-25-2017, 10:59 PM
  #46  
Senior Member
 
McCarthy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 977
Received 217 Likes on 125 Posts

Default

I'd pay $1000 more to have the LED's as an option on XLT's.

Actually, scratch that. I want the OEM HID's my old FX4 had. Those things were epic!
Old 10-26-2017, 12:41 AM
  #47  
Senior Member
 
Rambo 2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 295
Received 66 Likes on 48 Posts

Default

Here's what Mike Levine, the king of pickup trucks, said about it.

https://twitter.com/rjonesy
@mrlevine What’s their beef with headlights?
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes

Mike Levine‏ @mrlevine
Replying to @rjonesy
Don't know. F-150’s headlamps were developed through real-world driving and feedback. Standard halogen headlamps have earned Consumer Reports “Very Good” rating.

5:37 AM - 24 Oct 2017

Old 10-26-2017, 12:45 AM
  #48  
Senior Member
 
MagneticLariat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: North Idaho
Posts: 648
Received 316 Likes on 156 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PeteyPete
I agree. Ford did a great job with the ride, engine, and transmission, but there are some things I don't understand. There is no reason why my $52k MSRP'ed truck doesn't have leather, LED lights, and push button start. I almost bought the GMC because the Ford lacked those options.
I highly doubt 52k MSRP on a GMC gets you leather, HIDs and no amount of money gets your push button start on the twins.

Oh, but you get the sweet off center steering wheel!

I had a 2011 Yukon Denail and honestly it drove me crazy
Old 10-26-2017, 09:03 AM
  #49  
Senior Member
 
ks54703's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: West Central Wisconsin
Posts: 1,305
Received 410 Likes on 292 Posts
Default

Just wondering how many are driving with the instrument lighting at full brightness and pissing and moaning about bad headlights. Have driven from day one (40+yrs) with instrument lighting off or turned down to minimum. Halogens are just fine to me and hate the beady eyed LED blue crap when meeting in traffic. It is about night vision, just get you pupils to open up and you will see better at night. PS have gotten no speeding tickets, or ruined any vehicles with instrument lights at minimum or off at night.
The following users liked this post:
tdog02 (10-26-2017)
Old 10-26-2017, 09:48 AM
  #50  
Senior Member
 
acdii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 13,828
Received 2,719 Likes on 2,056 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by adammjarvis
You're failing to realize it's not the source of the light (halogen, HID, soy candle or LED). It's the kelvin and the optics.

There is a fine balance between being able to see at night and being able to see at night with a light source. I highly suggest you read up on it, if you're truly interested.

Just because something appears brighter to you doesn't mean it truly is one way or another. In the case of headlights, a lot of people focus on the short term not long term (short distance vs long distance). If you can only see 150' in front of you and you're doing 70mph - how quick will you travel 150'? Much faster than you can register!

However even with all my knowledge I ran HIDs in my fusion using a quality HID projector and 5000k bulbs running at 55w (compared to industry standard of 35w). Tho my setup was tuned to compensate for the distance, I still didn't go the optimal route but with my knowledge I was able to determine the pros an cons/benefits of the setup. I wouldn't have ran that setup at 35w, to say the least.

It's awesome stuff that a lot of people don't know about. We all have different motivations. Just gotta be open minded.

And you are failing to realize that I can see much further down the road, AND see along the sides of the road, AND see the road, shoulders, and trees when they are dark and wet in this truck, with LED lights, where I was never, ever, able to do so in any other vehicle, no matter what type of lighting it had.

Case closed, move along now.
The following users liked this post:
Mantruck1963 (12-29-2017)



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:40 PM.