Time slip
#31
Thanks
#34
#36
Very impressive numbers.
Let's stop with the the SSI bashing. We don't need that.
Instead, lets start with some more bashing, by me....please please don't start off a description of a truck with "bone stock" and then follow it by "91 Octane tune...etc" Its a bit confusing and contradictory.
Once again, I am very impressed by the numbers!
Let's stop with the the SSI bashing. We don't need that.
Instead, lets start with some more bashing, by me....please please don't start off a description of a truck with "bone stock" and then follow it by "91 Octane tune...etc" Its a bit confusing and contradictory.
Once again, I am very impressed by the numbers!
The following users liked this post:
tooloud10 (08-25-2015)
#37
Senior Member
Thread Starter
StevL,
This is straight from Consumer Reports test of the F150.... seems to be a lot of disparity.... like a second?
I wonder what the conditions were? Or the drivers? When I did the 14.08, my truck had low miles & conditions were far from ideal. I'm sure other '15s will do low 14s also.
Last edited by rancheroracer; 08-24-2015 at 12:40 PM.
#38
Senior Member
Thread Starter
You know what's crazy, my bone stock 2007 Tundra 4x4 Screw 4.30 gears ran 14.42@98. Those Tundra's are pretty stout, probably the only truck on the road that can hang with a stock 3.5 ECO. But you put a tune on that Eco & it's game over. However if you bolt the stock TRD Supercharger on the Tundra & it's game over. I love how far truck technology has come. Not only do we take trash to the dump, we drag race on the weekends....lol
#39
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Very impressive numbers.
Let's stop with the the SSI bashing. We don't need that.
Instead, lets start with some more bashing, by me....please please don't start off a description of a truck with "bone stock" and then follow it by "91 Octane tune...etc" Its a bit confusing and contradictory.
Once again, I am very impressed by the numbers!
Let's stop with the the SSI bashing. We don't need that.
Instead, lets start with some more bashing, by me....please please don't start off a description of a truck with "bone stock" and then follow it by "91 Octane tune...etc" Its a bit confusing and contradictory.
Once again, I am very impressed by the numbers!
#40
Senior Member
Very impressive numbers.
Let's stop with the the SSI bashing. We don't need that.
Instead, lets start with some more bashing, by me....please please don't start off a description of a truck with "bone stock" and then follow it by "91 Octane tune...etc" Its a bit confusing and contradictory.
Once again, I am very impressed by the numbers!
Let's stop with the the SSI bashing. We don't need that.
Instead, lets start with some more bashing, by me....please please don't start off a description of a truck with "bone stock" and then follow it by "91 Octane tune...etc" Its a bit confusing and contradictory.
Once again, I am very impressed by the numbers!
Exactly. I'm sitting here laughing through every page....Bone Stock.....with an SSI tune. That's not bone stock!!
The following users liked this post:
tooloud10 (08-25-2015)