Topic Sponsor
2015 - 2020 Ford F150 General discussion on the 13th generation Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Stock 2016 intercooler after 15k miles

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-05-2017, 08:51 AM
  #11  
2015 F150 Guy
 
tomjv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Somers, NY
Posts: 926
Received 122 Likes on 97 Posts

Default

Old 06-05-2017, 08:51 AM
  #12  
2015 F150 Guy
 
tomjv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Somers, NY
Posts: 926
Received 122 Likes on 97 Posts

Default

So how was oil sludge getting inside the intercooler?
TomJV
Old 06-05-2017, 09:51 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
02reaper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 806
Received 111 Likes on 77 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by tomjv
So how was oil sludge getting inside the intercooler?
TomJV
I'm guessing from either blowby of the rings or either the PCV system. Even on my 2011 F150 5.0, the PVC would suck some serious oil from the vehicle....Enough that It would be a quart low every 3k or so. I've had my eye on the oil levels of this truck since the beginning, and at 7k, its still exactly where I filled it so far.
Old 06-05-2017, 10:36 AM
  #14  
2015 F150 Guy
 
tomjv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Somers, NY
Posts: 926
Received 122 Likes on 97 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 02reaper
I'm guessing from either blowby of the rings or either the PCV system. Even on my 2011 F150 5.0, the PVC would suck some serious oil from the vehicle....Enough that It would be a quart low every 3k or so. I've had my eye on the oil levels of this truck since the beginning, and at 7k, its still exactly where I filled it so far.
Needs a catch can
Old 06-05-2017, 10:40 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
02reaper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 806
Received 111 Likes on 77 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by tomjv
Needs a catch can
Did you read the post? I'm NOT having any issues like the 2011-2014 ecoboosts were having with theirs.
The following 2 users liked this post by 02reaper:
Enoch (06-06-2017), Mitch Lewis (06-06-2017)
Old 06-05-2017, 12:49 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
johndeerefarmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 866
Received 119 Likes on 87 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 02reaper
Installed the Wagner intercooler on my 2016 f150 3.5 ecoboost this weekend with almost 15k miles and 2 oil changes. I'm happy to report that there was no oil or condensation sludge at all in the stock intercooler or lines.
I hope to get my Wagner installed this week so 5 star can turn up my tunes.

Who's tunes are you running on your '16?
Old 06-05-2017, 01:28 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
02reaper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 806
Received 111 Likes on 77 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by johndeerefarmer
I hope to get my Wagner installed this week so 5 star can turn up my tunes.

Who's tunes are you running on your '16?
Ive been running my own tune via HPtuners since Ive had the truck. The wagner intercooler is a nicely made one. I hope it works as well as it looks and fits.
Old 06-05-2017, 04:20 PM
  #18  
Member
 
groeder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Hello, does this mean that there would be a reasonable benefit to installing this intercooler on a truck with a stock tune and running better fuel?

Originally Posted by 02reaper
Ill update this thread after I get some logs on it this week. It started raining yesterday when I was about to test it out, but from what little logging I did get done, it appears to be 20 degrees cooler than the stock intercooler under normal driving and half throttle situations. The stock intercooler was usually allowing manifold charge temps to stay around 40 degrees over ambient temp and with boost and hot/humid GA weather, heatsoak would set in quickly. The reason for this upgrade is because the tuning on the ecoboost is load based and octane based. Above 120 degrees manifold charge temps, load is decreased in the stock tune (and in mine). Aftermarket tunes that ive seen have defeated this feature and allow for full load (and full boost) under any condition which I don't agree with. So regardless of modified tune or stock tune and more boost or towing....The cooler you can keep the Manifold charge temps, and the better octane you run, the better off you will be as far as safety for the motor and for the stock tune guys keeping a decent amount of boost.
Old 06-06-2017, 07:02 AM
  #19  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
02reaper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 806
Received 111 Likes on 77 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by groeder
Hello, does this mean that there would be a reasonable benefit to installing this intercooler on a truck with a stock tune and running better fuel?
Even on a stock tune, running better fuel, the stock intercooler will heatsoak after even a brief moment in boost due to full throttle or towing. Especially in the heat. So Yes.
Old 06-06-2017, 07:05 AM
  #20  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
02reaper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 806
Received 111 Likes on 77 Posts

Default

Did Some full throttle runs this morning and the initial results are good. The intercooler held right at 18-20 degrees over ambient temp. Much better than the stock intercooler that would be at 40 degrees over ambient temp and climbing during a full throttle run. This is on a tune that holds a consistent 17-17.5 psi and 93 octane.
The following users liked this post:
JAMADOR (06-06-2017)



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:09 AM.