Topic Sponsor
2015 - 2020 Ford F150 General discussion on the 13th generation Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Worksport

MPG lie-ometer

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 23, 2016 | 06:42 AM
  #21  
71_340's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 1,077
Likes: 159
From: Missouri
Default

Mine is accurate within 1 MPG, truck is stock. That is over 13K miles.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2016 | 08:26 AM
  #22  
bmes1982's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 25
Likes: 3
From: Howards Grove, WI
Default

My last tank the Trip said 19.9 and hand calculated was 18.8, so I'm off by about 6% as well.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2016 | 08:30 AM
  #23  
Mo Power's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 133
Likes: 16
From: SE WI
Default

My Gal Used figure is off by 1.4 gallons every time. I have the 36 gallon tank.
Ford should be concerned about this...the trip computer is not reporting accurate consumption readings and making the MPG look better than reality.

The trip computer on my 2011 F150 with 36 gallon tank was very accurate with the gas pump and hand calculations.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2016 | 08:48 AM
  #24  
remltr's Avatar
Old Fart
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 2,244
Likes: 312
From: Mesquite NV
Default

Off by 6% city driving.

Long road trip (1400 miles) off by much more.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2016 | 08:52 AM
  #25  
Jus Cruisin's Avatar
Gearhead
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,763
Likes: 782
From: Metro Detroit - missin FL
Default

I know mine is optimistic ( I've never owned a vehicle that it was accurate) , I don't really give a hoot. Some day I might hand calculate a tank or two but what does it matter.... It is what it is. When I get down to about a quarter tank showing, I fill it up and go about life.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2016 | 10:40 AM
  #26  
aspade's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 339
Likes: 186
Default

Originally Posted by archerychamp3d
It's summer time. I suspect we loose a fair amount of gas to evaporation especially over several days.
If you were losing a quart a day to evaporation, what do you suppose that a closed garage would smell like?

More importantly, how well do you suppose said closed garage would explode?
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2016 | 10:42 AM
  #27  
iplayloudly's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 318
Likes: 51
Default

Mine is also off about 6%, and my wife's Honda Pilot is the same way. Must be a government conspiracy.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2016 | 10:51 AM
  #28  
Ricktwuhk's Avatar
Senior Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 10
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 14,975
Likes: 6,035
From: SE Michigan
Default

If there are three off by 6, that's 666, so that means the devil is behind it...

First world problems.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2016 | 11:02 AM
  #29  
2015PlatMag's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 354
Likes: 42
Default

Originally Posted by alping45
What kind of accuracy are people seeing on the trucks calculations of MPG vs. Pen & paper recording of filling up at the pump and mileage driven?

I ask because I've been getting such un-impressive mileage based on the lie-ometer, I finally calculated it the old fashioned way expecting to get better results, and they were significantly worse!

Trucks numbers:
370 miles driven, 25.5 gallons used for 14.5MPG

Realtime numbers:
370 miles driven after full tank, 29 gallons to fill again for 12.7mpg! WTF!

Granted I'm running 35's and a 2.5" level but 12.7 out of a 3.5 EB come on!

This is on my daily commute to work not hauling anything but myself. 3 miles down the hill at 60mph, 1.5 miles through town at 40mph with no stops, then another 14 miles on the interstate at 75mph, and the same in reverse order coming home.
Im getting 15 mixed per dash readout 295 60 20s and adjusting 6% for the tire size. So.. if its over by 6% then tire size makes the computer accurate. I think that made sense. lol

Last edited by 2015PlatMag; Jun 23, 2016 at 11:05 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2016 | 11:32 AM
  #30  
Spamfritter's Avatar
Senior Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 445
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by alping45
What kind of accuracy are people seeing on the trucks calculations of MPG vs. Pen & paper recording of filling up at the pump and mileage driven?

I ask because I've been getting such un-impressive mileage based on the lie-ometer, I finally calculated it the old fashioned way expecting to get better results, and they were significantly worse!

Trucks numbers:
370 miles driven, 25.5 gallons used for 14.5MPG

Realtime numbers:
370 miles driven after full tank, 29 gallons to fill again for 12.7mpg! WTF!

Granted I'm running 35's and a 2.5" level but 12.7 out of a 3.5 EB come on!

This is on my daily commute to work not hauling anything but myself. 3 miles down the hill at 60mph, 1.5 miles through town at 40mph with no stops, then another 14 miles on the interstate at 75mph, and the same in reverse order coming home.
You can have ECO or Boost, but not at the same time. If you watch the boost gauge and try and keep it out of boost it won't be so bad. You generally have to run between 55 and 65MPH to get decent fuel economy. A lot of us 3.5L EB drivers are pretty aggressive and leveling, heavier wheels, offsets that cause the wheels to stick out past the vehicle's body, air dam deletes, and other weight adding modifications all impact gas mileage negatively. My truck took a significant mileage hit with my mods. 12.7MPG would be worse, but your also running 35's and I have no idea how far they stick out, but mine only stick out a small amount. 12.7MPG doesn't seem implausible depending on the variables in play here.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:50 PM.