Topic Sponsor
2015 - 2020 Ford F150 General discussion on the 13th generation Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Worksport

E85

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 25, 2019 | 08:51 PM
  #11  
volvodoc's Avatar
Senior Member
Veteran: Army
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 965
Likes: 110
From: Under the missing tree
Default

I fed mine a tank of no ethanol last week. No changes noted. Except it cost more.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2019 | 09:09 PM
  #12  
dykzeulb's Avatar
PLATINUM
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,087
Likes: 246
From: Kansas City
Default

The power it adds I feel is pretty noticeable l, mileage I can care less about, I bought a truck not a Prius. Ethanol 85 is cheaper here than standard unleaded, which I don't use anyways. Truck gets premium per the manual.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2019 | 09:16 PM
  #13  
dougg's Avatar
Thread Starter
5 Year Member
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 2,122
Likes: 630
Default

Originally Posted by jpeckinp
Don't confuse multi-port injection from the 80-90's to today's injection systems. Those were both behind the valve.
Today's have a direct injection in the cylinder and a port injector behind the valves.
I know
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2019 | 09:18 PM
  #14  
dougg's Avatar
Thread Starter
5 Year Member
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 2,122
Likes: 630
Default

which engine do you have?
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2019 | 09:30 PM
  #15  
Jwilliams1's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 28
Likes: 49
Default

Can you run the e85 in the 2.7?
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2019 | 09:33 PM
  #16  
johnday in BFE's Avatar
Village Sociopath
10 Year Member
Veteran: Navy
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 120 Days
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 31,749
Likes: 12,570
From: Nowhereville, Barton City Michigan
Default

I had a 93PRX tune on my '12 5.0, and would run pretty much all E85, 5 tanks of E85, and a tank of 93. At times I would change it up when the cost difference was less than .70 cents a gallon. I roughly figured the payback started at anything over a .70 delta. The worst mileage I got was around 12.5-12.7, but the power was very noticeable in combination with my tune. I'm planning on another 5.0 in a '20, and have lines on doing the same with it.
If it wasn't such a pain, and cost, I'd be running E85 in this 3.5.
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2019 | 01:48 AM
  #17  
MNgopher's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 515
Likes: 179
From: Lakeville, MN
Default

Originally Posted by Jwilliams1
Can you run the e85 in the 2.7?
No. Not in either Ecoboost engine stock.

Our work fleet is all flex fuel F150's and F250's. Several F250's have trouble switching back and forth between E85 and E10. We have starting issues in cold weather (10F or below). The trucks we have the issues on are now all E10 only and the problems have gone away.

Reply
Old Nov 26, 2019 | 03:08 AM
  #18  
Phil48315's Avatar
Super Moderator
Supporting Member

5 Year Member
Active Streak: 120 Days
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 11,128
Likes: 4,378
From: Unknown
Default

I am on my 4th tank.
2016 FX4 5.0, 3.73 gears and 275/70/18 BFGs
I have a CAI and a Pedal Commander.
I can tell a big difference , but I went from 87octane to E-85
I only drive local in city traffic, so my mileage went from 14 to 9.5
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2019 | 09:07 AM
  #19  
jpeckinp's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 203
Likes: 45
From: Las Vegas
Default

Originally Posted by dougg
which engine do you have?
I have 5.0. I have used E85 once but here in Vegas it's not worth it. I can get 91 at Costco for 3.13 and E85 is 2.85.
One thing I did to help keep things clean is a catch can.
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2019 | 10:53 PM
  #20  
ShapeShyfter's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 144
Likes: 48
Default

I don’t really notice any difference other than the drop in mpg. You need to account for that when figuring out whether it makes sense to use e85.

If your mpg drops 20-25%, then E85 needs to be 20-25% cheaper than 87 octane.

Here in CA, that’s been easy. In America, that’s a more difficult proposition.
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:50 AM.