Topic Sponsor
2015 - 2020 Ford F150 General discussion on the 13th generation Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Worksport

CVT?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 9, 2014 | 08:43 PM
  #1  
SeeManRun's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 185
Likes: 10
From: Vancouver, Canada
Default CVT?

I just read an article talking about Ford possibly dropping a 10 speed automatic transmission in the 2015. While that might be a stretch, with Dodge doing an 8 speed it seems likely that Ford will match or exceed at some point.

My question is, why not go to a CVT? From what I understand, they are simpler and more durable and would get much better gas mileage than a traditional 5 speed transmission. I imagine a 10 speed transmission is approaching CVT mileage, but why not just go with a CVT and be done with it?
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2014 | 10:52 PM
  #2  
Superman750's Avatar
Dog Trainer
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 132
Likes: 20
From: New Mexico
Default

I will be the first to say that I don't know anything about CVT's, they may be more durable, but would they be able to tow as much?
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2014 | 01:30 AM
  #3  
SeeManRun's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 185
Likes: 10
From: Vancouver, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by Superman750
I will be the first to say that I don't know anything about CVT's, they may be more durable, but would they be able to tow as much?
Well, assuming they can, and they get better mileage, would truck owners be willing to accept the "weirdness" of a CVT and no shifting (I know they can simulate automatic shifts). Judging by the uptake of a twin turbo gas engine, I would say yes.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2014 | 06:44 AM
  #4  
Daycruiser's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 34
Likes: 9
Default

I have strong reservations about a CVT being able to sustain a truck application. My experience with them in cars hasn't been good, wouldn't own another one. Can only imagine what reliability issues would crop up in a truck application.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2014 | 06:57 AM
  #5  
boosted150's Avatar
Whoosh
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 523
Likes: 114
From: Anchorage, Alaska
Default

Originally Posted by Daycruiser
I have strong reservations about a CVT being able to sustain a truck application. My experience with them in cars hasn't been good, wouldn't own another one. Can only imagine what reliability issues would crop up in a truck application.

+1

CTV is only good for "throw away" vehicles. If you're getting rid of it in 3 years, go ahead and get one. Rebuilding/replacing a CVT is ridiculously expensive. I will not own another one, I keep my stuff more than 5 years on average.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2014 | 07:40 AM
  #6  
Masi1926's Avatar
American member
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 6,651
Likes: 1,063
From: North of Boston Ma.
Default

Ya we test drove the Subaru with the cvt. Not ready for prime time.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2014 | 10:28 AM
  #7  
okiebullitt's Avatar
Junior Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Default

My wifes SUV has a CVT in it. It has been dead reliable without any issues, but damn it drives weird. The problem with placing a CVT transmission in a truck is the towing reliability. CVT transmissions (for the most part) employ a belt system internally which limits the torque loads they can handle. Nissan has begun employing a chain CVT in the Pathfinder (what my wife drives) which has increased its ability to handle that torque and tow a good amount. As far as the cost- as long as you don't have to replace one, currently they cannot be rebuilt, the cost of ownership is similar to a geared transmission. Besides, I bet if you had to have any of the newer tranny's repaired it is comparable to replacing a CVT.

Before I got the F150 we towed my Mustang to track events all over the southwest last summer with the Pathfinder and it handled the towing fine. So, I would say they are making strides with the CVT tranny but I still don't believe it is ready for the truck market.

Besides, it drives super weird. Punch the gas and it just holds an RPM, doesn't really go up or down, just holds it. Takes a little getting used to. The upside to this weirdness is that the fuel economy has been excellent.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2014 | 10:33 AM
  #8  
03f15012's Avatar
Super Moderator
Supporting Member

10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 13,490
Likes: 553
From: North Charleston, SC
Default

I've always been wary about CVT transmissions. Nissan has been doing it for a while, and seemed to have improved it. The early years were not that great. Neighbor has one, and it went out on him. Didn't even have 100k on it.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2014 | 10:42 AM
  #9  
justjimmy's Avatar
Better OUT then IN
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,343
Likes: 255
From: South Florida (Ft. Lauderdale area)
Default

CVT works great on my ATV!

:-)
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2014 | 11:45 AM
  #10  
SeeManRun's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 185
Likes: 10
From: Vancouver, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by Daycruiser
I have strong reservations about a CVT being able to sustain a truck application. My experience with them in cars hasn't been good, wouldn't own another one. Can only imagine what reliability issues would crop up in a truck application.
Can you elaborate what has not been good about them?
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:29 PM.