Topic Sponsor
2015 - 2020 Ford F150 General discussion on the 13th generation Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2015 HP & TQ for New Engines (Numbers Inside)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-26-2014, 09:04 PM
  #101  
Senior Member
 
mechanicboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 2,324
Received 270 Likes on 191 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by linkin_park_453
Funny you think that the 5.0 is sooooo underrated dyno sheets don't lie, prime example mpt 5.0 made 285 Rwhp and ecoboost made 315 Rwhp so now tell me which ones underated
Actually, Dyno sheets do lie, I have experience on them and you can make than say about anything you want.

Did mpt want to show lower standard numbers to show a greater gain? Yes they would. Most stock Dyno numbers for the 5.0 are 305-310 that I see. Did MPT Dyno the ecoboost on the same day on the same dyno with the same parameters set? If not they are not even close to being compatible.

Take this for example, my truck made 540rwhp on the Dyno but it is only 0.06 faster than their truck that made well over 100 more rwhp with a lighter truck (he is 2wd. Vs my 4wd) and a considerably faster 60' time (they had a 1.65 to my 1.77 Because he runs traction bars and slicks). Not only that but their trap speed was lower (their 114mph vs my 116mph) this would indicate that my truck is actually putting down more power than theirs.

So tell me again your personal experience how Dyno numbers don't lie?
Old 07-26-2014, 09:07 PM
  #102  
Senior Member
 
mechanicboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 2,324
Received 270 Likes on 191 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Logan24
As much as I'd love to see Ford up the numbers on the 5.0 I just don't see it happening.
And here's why...Ford's "premium" engine, not to mention it's their most advertised motor probably ever, is obviously the Ecoboost. For some reason they decided to keep the numbers the same for the 2015s. I just don't understand how Ford could market the EB anymore, not to mention charge a premium (I paid 1750 in 2012). I paid the extra for the 5hp and ~30tq.
If Ford gives the 5.0 roughly 35 more HP than the EB and brings the TQ closer or the same too I just don't see how the EB would stay the "premium" engine.
I honestly don't think Ford will mess with the status quo. Maybe 2016 or 17 we'll see a rise in the numbers but I think this year the 5.0 and the 3.5EB are taking a back seat to brand spanking new (and impressive if you ask me) 2.7 EB.
Now you can call me out if I'm wrong when the numbers are released but I'm pretty certain the 5.0 will be the same as 2014.
The official numbers might not change, but the 5.0 is supposed to have a different intake that Should improve low-end torque even if the numbers don't show it.

For the record, I'm not saying the 5.0 will have more power than the 3.5 eco.
Old 07-26-2014, 09:09 PM
  #103  
Senior Member
 
linkin_park_453's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 369
Received 61 Likes on 41 Posts
Default

Well every dyno from all the tuners besides 5 stars fudged numbers are higher then the 5.0 and I've raced three of my buddies now and if they have more power they would of beat me! But that's besides the point I'll sit back and let this thread continue but I refuse to let lies go on here
Old 07-26-2014, 09:13 PM
  #104  
TTV6>V8
 
Logan24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 1,734
Received 280 Likes on 194 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mechanicboy
The official numbers might not change, but the 5.0 is supposed to have a different intake that Should improve low-end torque even if the numbers don't show it. For the record, I'm not saying the 5.0 will have more power than the 3.5 eco.
Can you elaborate on the intake? This is the first I've heard of that and I'd be interested to hear what's in store...
Old 07-26-2014, 09:33 PM
  #105  
Senior Member
 
mechanicboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 2,324
Received 270 Likes on 191 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by linkin_park_453
Well every dyno from all the tuners besides 5 stars fudged numbers are higher then the 5.0 and I've raced three of my buddies now and if they have more power they would of beat me! But that's besides the point I'll sit back and let this thread continue but I refuse to let lies go on here
Hey buddy, idk what your problem is but I never said the 5.0 made more power than the eco so you need to stop spreading the lies you speak of. I said it was derated, get your facts straight.

Fwiw, my brother has an eco and it's a driver's race when we were both stock and I won more times than not. The problem was I was the better driver, not that he didn't make more power.

If you want to argue something I want to hear your experiences on how Dyno numbers don't lie, I'll sit back and pop some popcorn now.

Originally Posted by Logan24
Can you elaborate on the intake? This is the first I've heard of that and I'd be interested to hear what's in store...

"Up top is a new intake manifold. While quite similar in design, runner length, and height to the S197 Coyote intake, the new manifold bristles with Charge Motion Control Valves and their actuators. These valves introduce tumble and swirl into the airflow at part throttle, maximizing combustion efficiency."

No guarantee that the f150 will get the same intake though.

http://www.svtperformance.com/?p=3125

Last edited by mechanicboy; 07-26-2014 at 09:37 PM.
The following users liked this post:
GOBLUEJD (07-26-2014)
Old 07-26-2014, 09:56 PM
  #106  
TTV6>V8
 
Logan24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 1,734
Received 280 Likes on 194 Posts

Default

Hmm. Interesting. Do you think the new intake manifold would add more than say 5-10 FT/P TQ?
Old 07-27-2014, 12:26 AM
  #107  
Senior Member
 
mechanicboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 2,324
Received 270 Likes on 191 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Logan24
Hmm. Interesting. Do you think the new intake manifold would add more than say 5-10 FT/P TQ?
Under the curve yes.
Old 07-27-2014, 01:44 AM
  #108  
TTV6>V8
 
Logan24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 1,734
Received 280 Likes on 194 Posts

Default

It's going to be interesting to see how the two compete that's for sure.
Old 07-27-2014, 07:14 AM
  #109  
Senior Member
 
Daytoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 352
Received 53 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nfldfordman
interesting, wasn't aware they were using CGI. I partially withdraw my previous comment. very interested to see how these engines do. still, I won't be screwing around with turbos and if I buy a next gen F-150 I will only buy a 5.0.
No....you'll buy what Ford WANTS you to buy. Turboed V6s. And you'll lap it up like the good lemming your are. And you'll love it. Cause Fords says so.
Old 07-27-2014, 09:16 AM
  #110  
Senior Member
 
nfldfordman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: New Harbour, NFLD
Posts: 58,828
Received 1,180 Likes on 1,070 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Daytoman
No....you'll buy what Ford WANTS you to buy. Turboed V6s. And you'll lap it up like the good lemming your are. And you'll love it. Cause Fords says so.


ford wants me to buy a turbo V6, fords losing a customer.


Quick Reply: 2015 HP & TQ for New Engines (Numbers Inside)



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:44 PM.