Topic Sponsor
1987 - 1996 F150 Still running strong! Talk about your 8th and 9th generation Ford F150 trucks.

Curiousity

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 21, 2013 | 11:24 PM
  #21  
Forge-World-FORD's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,364
Likes: 102
Default

Originally Posted by sdmartin65
The whole smog police thing is stretching a bit, maybe in California but not in the real world. Those rules are mainly in place to keep repair facilities from removing emissions devices.
Incorrect. Pre-1990 revisions to the Clean Air Act left loopholes that used to make this true, but since the revision they have been closed. It is a fact that it is against the law to tamper, modify, or remove emissions control equipment from a vehicle by anyone. Exceptions include vehicles exclusively for racing, off road vehicles, vehicles not previously equipped with emissions control from the factory (generally pre-67), etc. Just because they are generally lax about enforcement doesn't make it any less illegal. Lots of people get away with speeding maybe a fe MPH over a given limit or more in some places, but you could still get in trouble for it.

I have no personal opinion either way. On my older vehicles I'll most likely remove it, but I'm taking an educated risk. I wouldn't ever suggest to anyone to do something that breaks the law.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2013 | 12:08 AM
  #22  
sdmartin65's Avatar
Martin
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 3,036
Likes: 260
From: Lehi, Utah
Default

Whoa...Didn't say it wasn't against the law to remove it. What I did say was a repair garage won't get involved with removing it. I've never heard of the average joe getting the type of fine that can be levied on a garage, a fix it ticket maybe. I do agree it's better to keep the cats intact, the smell, pollutants, performance and on and on.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2013 | 01:20 AM
  #23  
Warlockk's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,669
Likes: 116
From: Long Beach, CA
Default

I know I sometimes come off harsh, like I said obviously if I were a big tree hugger I'd have something other than a 90 f150, a 66 mustang and a motorcycle. It mostly brothers me that there is much bad information accepted as truth when it comes to emissions. Every time some one asks a question about cats, EGR, pipes or air systems several people immediately post remove that junk and your car will run better. Its as bad as those Honda tuner sights that over ride their computers so bad that they spend thousands if dollars on aftermarket parts just to loose 25 hp on their stock cars. I am constantly fixing cars that have been modified to get them to run right again. I just like to think we are a little more intelligent than that. Secondly some of the older guys that have worked in the business can tell you that these smog laws are always getting stiffer. Its only been about 40 years that we went from basically nothing to a complicated system that you are not allowed to touch. My instructor tells stories about every time a new part came out PVC, then smog pumps, then cats, then computers, etc. old mechanics would resist and refuse to learn them. The fact is they aren't going away. Were talking about stuff on 30 year old trucks that they are still using today. Politicians are not car lovers. Auto manufacturers lobby for any law that will make us buy new cars. Tree hugging political groups are made up of rich people who don't work and feel like they are contributing to something. The fact is we can only count on ourselves to make it so we can keep our classics and off roaders. One of my 4x4 groups just fought to keep the property open where king of the hammers is run. We have to be able to show facts that our trucks are not destroying the earth like these pseudo scientists claim we are. That's one big reason I push for it. If it doesn't hurt my performance and it makes things cleaner I'm all for it. They haven't removed a law since prohibition. Laws will just get stricter. If the TH's can point to us and say "see we need a law or these guys will just ruin the environment" then they will be able to make it pass. And they will do it in a heartbeat if it gets them votes. It will definitely get them money. Here in California 75% of what we charge for a state smog check goes to the government in taxes and fees. If you think they won't do it in low population states think about how many states now have helmet laws. And I believe all states now have seatbelt laws. Those only passed within the last 15 years. Tickets make money for local government. Anyway I'm just trying to help out. I'd hate to have to take my grandkids 4 Wheeling on an asphalt track in an electric truck that says Prius on it.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2013 | 06:46 PM
  #24  
93F-150's Avatar
Mrs. W
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 40,027
Likes: 37
From: South Dakota
Default

okay i'm going off topic here because i like to argue but our state has seatbelt laws yet they cant pull you over just for not wearing your seatbelt. what does that tell me? it says i can get away without wearing it just like you can get away with anything else if you're smart
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2013 | 06:53 PM
  #25  
JoeRomo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 355
Likes: 7
From: Central Illinois
Default

If they see you not wearing it they will pull you over and give you some bs reason so they can write you a seat belt ticket
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2013 | 09:20 PM
  #26  
93F-150's Avatar
Mrs. W
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 40,027
Likes: 37
From: South Dakota
Default

Originally Posted by JoeRomo
If they see you not wearing it they will pull you over and give you some bs reason so they can write you a seat belt ticket
well i've never been pulled over i the ten years or so i've been driving
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2013 | 06:25 AM
  #27  
Warlockk's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,669
Likes: 116
From: Long Beach, CA
Default

Originally Posted by JoeRomo
If they see you not wearing it they will pull you over and give you some bs reason so they can write you a seat belt ticket
Just because you've never seen a million dollars doesn't mean it doesn't exist. I know a few people that have been stopped for seatbelts.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2013 | 10:20 AM
  #28  
Rusty but trusty's Avatar
Drive like you stole it
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 884
Likes: 70
From: Where the snow/salt is
Default

Screw the ticket, have you seen how distracted people are behind the wheel? Texting/talking on the phone, playing with their gps ect ect. I wear mine because I don't want to get piled into by somebody sending a text. I had a coworker that was sitting at a red light and got smoked from behind at 50mph by somebody sending a text, never saw it coming and got beat up pretty bad, he regretted not having a seatbelt on!
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2013 | 01:13 PM
  #29  
JoeRomo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 355
Likes: 7
From: Central Illinois
Default

Originally Posted by Warlockk
Just because you've never seen a million dollars doesn't mean it doesn't exist. I know a few people that have been stopped for seatbelts.
I didn't say they won't. In my state people get pulled over for it all the time. They said that in there state they can't pull you over for it. All I was saying was they can give you another excuse to give you ticket.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2013 | 08:54 PM
  #30  
mustangGT90210's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,298
Likes: 173
From: Florida
Default

Your truck will be fine with no cat. My '91 is catless, true dual with an X pipe and a flowmaster in each pipe. Sounds good, still has all it's power. Exits out the rear. Never smelled any exhaust fumes in the cab either in 4 years. Yeah the exhaust doesn't smell the best, it just smells like an old truck.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:53 PM.