Topic Sponsor
1987 - 1996 F150 Still running strong! Talk about your 8th and 9th generation Ford F150 trucks.

302 and 351 the same??

Old 11-15-2008, 02:09 PM
  #11  
Junior Member
 
1994F1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: State College, PA
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hey guys,
Got this problem ya see. my 1994 F150 5.8L has a flat tappet cam, what year was roller in 5.8L. i just got this motor too, so i need to know what to do fast.

Also anyone ever fool around with MAF on a 5.8 cause this one doesnt have it and i need it for the Cam i need to run. Is there a retro fit? Or a website that has the Kits?

Thanks.
Old 11-15-2008, 11:12 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
ma94xlt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Columbus GA 31909
Posts: 481
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 1994F1
Hey guys,
Got this problem ya see. my 1994 F150 5.8L has a flat tappet cam, what year was roller in 5.8L. i just got this motor too, so i need to know what to do fast.

Also anyone ever fool around with MAF on a 5.8 cause this one doesnt have it and i need it for the Cam i need to run. Is there a retro fit? Or a website that has the Kits?

Thanks.

If the 352 is a 94 it should be roller ready. Even though they are roller,, Ford used flat tappets in them. Should have the 2 tapped bosses in the lifter valley and an F4 starting identifying number by starter.

As for the MAF swap, check out the lightning site NLOC..
Old 01-28-2010, 09:42 PM
  #13  
Junior Member
 
1000ml's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i,m going thru the same swap and have it completed except i now have somer running issues.i had 94 fi50 4x4 302 auto i installed a 351 out of a 90 f350 2 wheel drive auto.
the front accesory mounts all bolted up perfect and just order a belt for a 351. the exhaust manifolds and y pipe came off the 351. crossover tube from the heads was fine . had to lengthen harnes for o2 sensor to meet up with the new location in different y-pipe, didn't have to change oil pan or anything. different pollution tubes but easy enough to re-route.
what i found so far. the 302(h.o.) and the windsor had the same firing order. the 351 was map and the 302 was maf. used the 302 computer and engine harness. had to switch the distributor out of the 351 to a newer style which came out of a 95. truck would start but ran pig rich and wouldn't idle. found that the throttle plates on the 302 had small holes in each butterfly and the 351 did not. swapped throttle boddies. truck will now idle , would stall unless i held throttle open previously. the truck still surges at idle and misses? not too sure why as it ran fine in other truck?
Old 01-28-2010, 11:11 PM
  #14  
Senior Member

 
ymeski56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Long Beach Calimexifornia
Posts: 58,557
Received 1,162 Likes on 647 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by wde3477
It's my understanding that the 5.0L HO engine has a different firing order than other 5.0s due to the use of the 351 cam which requires the 351 firing order. Basically the 3 and 7 cylinders are swapped with the 5 and 4 cylinders in the order, putting each 360 degrees out of their standard 5.0L firing order phase to agree with the 351 order. (Remember, a complete combustion cycle has 720 degrees of rotation - two times around).
5/5.8 HO = Same 1,3,.... // 5/5.8 non-HO = Same 1,5,....
Old 02-17-2010, 05:16 PM
  #15  
Member
 
mikepotts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ymeski56
5/5.8 HO = Same 1,3,.... // 5/5.8 non-HO = Same 1,5,....
the 5.0 has the old 302 firing order, the 5.0 H.O. has the same firing order as the 5.8 w. the windsors have always had the same firing order H.O. or not.
Old 02-17-2010, 05:20 PM
  #16  
Member
 
mikepotts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i have a similar delema. i have a 1990 f-150 4x4 5.0 auto. i am starting to build another 5.0 for the truck, i want to keep the stock intake and all of the electronics (no rewiring B.S.). should i get another flat tappet cam, or can i make it run correctly with a roller cam, maybe with a computer swap, W/O a mass air conversion.
Old 02-17-2010, 05:23 PM
  #17  
Member
 
mikepotts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

do yall think a speed density mustang computer would make it work?
Old 02-17-2010, 05:35 PM
  #18  
Member
 
mikepotts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

looks like i found the answer to my own question...
notice pins 58 & 59, this is for the truck computer... batch fire.
http://fordfuelinjection.com/truckpinouts.html

and notice on the cars, they are sequential.
http://fordfuelinjection.com/5.0Lpinouts.html

looks like the only way to get a roller cam to work in my truck is to add mass air, and a 94-95 truck computer maybe even the wiring harness. looks like im getting a flat tappet cam.

Last edited by mikepotts; 02-17-2010 at 05:39 PM.


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 302 and 351 the same??



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:12 AM.